Good luck where ever you end up!Greyhound42 wrote:Just withdrew my application, hope someone else gets my monie$$$ to go to Minnesota, really loved the school but it didn't make much financial sense to go considering some of my other offers and, you know, the cold.
Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Well that was perhaps the most successful admitted students weekend possible.
Cheers to those that attended.
Cheers to those that attended.
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Can you guys that attended give any more specific information about job numbers and stuff? I had an ASW at Texas last weekend and they broke down the new numbers regarding firm placement, clerkships, medians for salary, etc. Wondering where MN sits on that scale.reyals wrote:Well that was perhaps the most successful admitted students weekend possible.
Cheers to those that attended.
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
MN hasn't processed the new numbers yet from what I could tell, but the ABA has the 2012 stats up if you want to look at them. We were presented with 2011 stats which had the salary median at 110k for the private sector. Law School Transparency has them with a score 66%. I believe I posted that around 155 of the 230 class had full-time legal jobs. They really stressed networking at the weekend.romanticegotist wrote:Can you guys that attended give any more specific information about job numbers and stuff? I had an ASW at Texas last weekend and they broke down the new numbers regarding firm placement, clerkships, medians for salary, etc. Wondering where MN sits on that scale.reyals wrote:Well that was perhaps the most successful admitted students weekend possible.
Cheers to those that attended.
Of course, you can check out LST for all the specific info you're looking for.
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school= ... =employers
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thanks! UT had their median jump to 160k and their clerkship rate is pretty excellent. But Minnesota is free. This decision is going to be difficult to make in a week!reyals wrote:MN hasn't processed the new numbers yet from what I could tell, but the ABA has the 2012 stats up if you want to look at them. We were presented with 2011 stats which had the salary median at 110k for the private sector. Law School Transparency has them with a score 66%. I believe I posted that around 155 of the 230 class had full-time legal jobs. They really stressed networking at the weekend.romanticegotist wrote:Can you guys that attended give any more specific information about job numbers and stuff? I had an ASW at Texas last weekend and they broke down the new numbers regarding firm placement, clerkships, medians for salary, etc. Wondering where MN sits on that scale.reyals wrote:Well that was perhaps the most successful admitted students weekend possible.
Cheers to those that attended.
Of course, you can check out LST for all the specific info you're looking for.
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school= ... =employers
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
UTs median is DEFINITELY not 160k.romanticegotist wrote:
Thanks! UT had their median jump to 160k and their clerkship rate is pretty excellent. But Minnesota is free. This decision is going to be difficult to make in a week!
for C/O 2012, 26.4% of the class ended up in firms of 100+. Those would be the ones paying 160.
I mean, there is no denying that UT places better than UMN. But they are fooling you by not putting the
*% of class that reported data
on that 160 stat.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:13 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
To all Gopher vets out there- any strong recommendations on housing locations? Close to the school, uptown, good bus shuttle routes vs. city bus, etc.? Thanks. What can I expect to pay for a decent (not great, not terrible) 1 or 2 BR apartment?
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I was really incredulous but that was the info they gave us along with their ABA data for class of 2012. Granted, they can only report on info from respondents but they got about 80% of the class to respond. Mean income was 122k but that's pretty useless b/c of that whole bimodal distribution.Nova wrote:UTs median is DEFINITELY not 160k.romanticegotist wrote:
Thanks! UT had their median jump to 160k and their clerkship rate is pretty excellent. But Minnesota is free. This decision is going to be difficult to make in a week!
for C/O 2012, 26.4% of the class ended up in firms of 100+. Those would be the ones paying 160.
I mean, there is no denying that UT places better than UMN. But they are fooling you by not putting the
*% of class that reported data
on that 160 stat.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LST uses the same data, and im just not seeing how 40% of the class is making 160k. As for the mean... It may help a little if we were to assume half the class is making 160 max, and then the others that reported would make about 80k average. Most of which would be in the 60-100k range.romanticegotist wrote:I was really incredulous but that was the info they gave us along with their ABA data for class of 2012. Granted, they can only report on info from respondents but they got about 80% of the class to respond. Mean income was 122k but that's pretty useless b/c of that whole bimodal distribution.Nova wrote:UTs median is DEFINITELY not 160k.romanticegotist wrote:
Thanks! UT had their median jump to 160k and their clerkship rate is pretty excellent. But Minnesota is free. This decision is going to be difficult to make in a week!
for C/O 2012, 26.4% of the class ended up in firms of 100+. Those would be the ones paying 160.
I mean, there is no denying that UT places better than UMN. But they are fooling you by not putting the
*% of class that reported data
on that 160 stat.
Im just staying on the subject because Im from Texas (grew up in Dallas, was living in Austin), and was considering UT in state too.
Anyway, good luck with your decision!
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
No way Texas' placement is that high. And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways). Of course, if you have a science degree it's different.
- jing87
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:59 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
what do you mean, why science major is different? I have a degree at EE, is that a science major?minnbills wrote:No way Texas' placement is that high. And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways). Of course, if you have a science degree it's different.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah, that counts.jing87 wrote:what do you mean, why science major is different? I have a degree at EE, is that a science major?minnbills wrote:No way Texas' placement is that high. And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways). Of course, if you have a science degree it's different.
Basically, intellectual property lawyers are in much higher demand and are not really competing on the same field as everyone else.
If you dont want to do IP, the science background is irrelevant.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
STEM majors can get it dat IP/Patent law, yes EE counts.jing87 wrote:what do you mean, why science major is different? I have a degree at EE, is that a science major?minnbills wrote:No way Texas' placement is that high. And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways). Of course, if you have a science degree it's different.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
this is not entirely credited. 2 family friends who graduated from the U of M last year got first year positions at Dorsey for big market salary, which was admittedly a little lower than $160K but not by much, at least $130K. definitely counts as biglaw, and dorsey is actually not even the largest firm in the state. they were not STEM fields.minnbills wrote: And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways).
its not common but there definitely IS biglaw in minneapolis if you gun for it and graduate top 25%.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
People get it- I know some going to NYC/Chi/big minneapolis firms etc. but what I'm saying is you should assume you're not going to get it. Ask yourself if you're okay with that scenario before going to a non-T14 school.jbagelboy wrote:this is not entirely credited. 2 family friends who graduated from the U of M last year got first year positions at Dorsey for big market salary, which was admittedly a little lower than $160K but not by much, at least $130K. definitely counts as biglaw, and dorsey is actually not even the largest firm in the state. they were not STEM fields.minnbills wrote: And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways).
its not common but there definitely IS biglaw in minneapolis if you gun for it and graduate top 25%.
Being motivated to find work is probably the biggest thing. The person with the lowest grades in my section got the highest paying summer job, and she's not a science major either.
- BitterSplitter
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by BitterSplitter on Thu Jun 13, 2013 2:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- dawyzest1
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 7:39 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Just withdrew today putting a seat up for grabs and full scholly $ ($143k) back into the pool. Hope someone here snaps it up!
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:38 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I know they mentioned that they don't negotiate pretty directly at the preview events, but I'm wondering if I should give it a shot again?
I simply can't afford the debt that I'd need to take on in order to attend at my current scholarship, but I am absolutely in love with the city and school and want to attend horribly...
I simply can't afford the debt that I'd need to take on in order to attend at my current scholarship, but I am absolutely in love with the city and school and want to attend horribly...
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Regardless of what they say they do negotiate with some people. Keep holding out. I would wait until you're close to the deadline, by then they'll have a better idea of how badly they want you.historicrep wrote:I know they mentioned that they don't negotiate pretty directly at the preview events, but I'm wondering if I should give it a shot again?
I simply can't afford the debt that I'd need to take on in order to attend at my current scholarship, but I am absolutely in love with the city and school and want to attend horribly...
- jing87
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:59 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
She got to be super hot or this makes no sense to meminnbills wrote:People get it- I know some going to NYC/Chi/big minneapolis firms etc. but what I'm saying is you should assume you're not going to get it. Ask yourself if you're okay with that scenario before going to a non-T14 school.jbagelboy wrote:this is not entirely credited. 2 family friends who graduated from the U of M last year got first year positions at Dorsey for big market salary, which was admittedly a little lower than $160K but not by much, at least $130K. definitely counts as biglaw, and dorsey is actually not even the largest firm in the state. they were not STEM fields.minnbills wrote: And if you're coming to the U you should assume you're not getting "biglaw" (we don't really have true biglaw in minneapolis anyways).
its not common but there definitely IS biglaw in minneapolis if you gun for it and graduate top 25%.
Being motivated to find work is probably the biggest thing. The person with the lowest grades in my section got the highest paying summer job, and she's not a science major either.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- reyals
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:29 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Debating whether or not I should try and negotiate.
hmm hmm hmm...
hmm hmm hmm...
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
If you're asking, you already know what the CW is. You're just fishing for some support.reyals wrote:Debating whether or not I should try and negotiate.
hmm hmm hmm...
- spark1
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 2:09 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
on the WL since Feb, anyone off the WL?
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Shit tons. What are your numbers?spark1 wrote:on the WL since Feb, anyone off the WL?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login