Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- polareagle
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by polareagle on Tue Feb 18, 2014 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm just trying to keep my head down... don't mention me, and maybe YLS will forget about me during these ding/WL waves, and when they remember me later just assume that they meant to accept meaz21833 wrote:MOTM how we looking? me and wert still kickin on the WL train. love our WL #s
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Bought precisely for this occasion...
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Is that stuff good? I've been meaning to try it for a while...LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Bought precisely for this occasion...
Edit: great post to start page 100
- vividviolin
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:47 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Still alive over here too. Early December submit.
I keep telling myself I don't care and that it doesn't matter, but an email from my bank just about gave me a heart attack right now...
I keep telling myself I don't care and that it doesn't matter, but an email from my bank just about gave me a heart attack right now...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
OMG it's a pint of sex.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Is that stuff good? I've been meaning to try it for a while...
Edit: great post to start page 100
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Aww, I wish I could hug y'all.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
+1LSATSCORES2012 wrote:OMG it's a pint of sex.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Is that stuff good? I've been meaning to try it for a while...
Edit: great post to start page 100
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:56 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
Good luck to everyone
Last edited by BalanceCare on Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- edgeofthenight
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Dear Yale,LSATSCORES2012 wrote:OMG it's a pint of sex.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Is that stuff good? I've been meaning to try it for a while...
Edit: great post to start page 100
Please don't reject me before I can buy some of this.
xoxox,
edge
(so sorry to everyone. sending internet hugs your way)
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I just walked by. All the lights are off and they're sending telegrams by candlelight to a third party, who is then sending out the e-mails. No wonder it takes so long.TrustInMusic wrote:carbon, can you do the honours tonight?edgeofthenight wrote:If any of you go to YLS, can you please hide out in the admissions office one night and see what exactly they do? I'm both annoyed and mad curious about how this is taking so long.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
And oh no, I'm sorry for you too YukosYukos wrote:Rejected. Quickly rehearsing my "Yale is just so much bigger," and "New Haven sucks" speeches to explain why I'm going to Stanford.
(and Stanford? Also , I was hoping to see you at Harvard)[/quote]
Really loved Harvard but I'm a California boy at heart. Would've killed me to choose New Haven weather over Palo Alto weather so I'm kinda glad things played out this way.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
Last edited by ManOfTheMinute on Tue Apr 16, 2013 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Freaking Morse and his Codecarboncopyx wrote:I just walked by. All the lights are off and they're sending telegrams by candlelight to a third party, who is then sending out the e-mails. No wonder it takes so long.TrustInMusic wrote:carbon, can you do the honours tonight?edgeofthenight wrote:If any of you go to YLS, can you please hide out in the admissions office one night and see what exactly they do? I'm both annoyed and mad curious about how this is taking so long.
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
You even going to bother coming this weekend?ManOfTheMinute wrote:lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah, its going to be a fun time - and you never know, I might be woefully misinformed.wert3813 wrote:You even going to bother coming this weekend?ManOfTheMinute wrote:lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
im leaning HLS over SLS right now FWIW. although penn might be in lead
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They're gonna get you drunk a lot more than Stanford did, but it should still be an easy decision.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Yeah, its going to be a fun time - and you never know, I might be woefully misinformed.wert3813 wrote:You even going to bother coming this weekend?ManOfTheMinute wrote:lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Wait, no way. I'm so excited about this. It's like they know the way to my heart.Yukos wrote:They're gonna get you drunk a lot more than Stanford did, but it should still be an easy decision.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I mean, they kind of have to in the hopes that you'll forget that you're freezing half to deathcarboncopyx wrote:Wait, no way. I'm so excited about this. It's like they know the way to my heart.Yukos wrote:They're gonna get you drunk a lot more than Stanford did, but it should still be an easy decision.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 7:56 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Long as you're speaking and giggling strictly for yourself, I suppose so. Other people involved in the decision though!ManOfTheMinute wrote:lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Ok, way to get all serious.BalanceCare wrote:Long as you're speaking and giggling strictly for yourself, I suppose so. Other people involved in the decision though!ManOfTheMinute wrote:lol @ choosing between HLS and SLS when SLS is clearly the answerBalanceCare wrote:Dinged! Pretty happy not to have to consider Y in light of my SO's deep hatred for New Haven (tho I'm agnostic). Should be much easier to choose between S and H now.
Good luck to everyone
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
so yukos wert MOTM and all my other brotherin, you're all leaning SLS over HLS right now? anybody picking HLS over SLS?
- polareagle
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm almost positively picking HLS over SLSaz21833 wrote:so yukos wert MOTM and all my other brotherin, you're all leaning SLS over HLS right now? anybody picking HLS over SLS?
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Yale c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LOL @ Californians thinking that the 50s is freezing half to death...ManOfTheMinute wrote:I mean, they kind of have to in the hopes that you'll forget that you're freezing half to deathcarboncopyx wrote:Wait, no way. I'm so excited about this. It's like they know the way to my heart.Yukos wrote:They're gonna get you drunk a lot more than Stanford did, but it should still be an easy decision.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login