BC 2012-2013 Applicants Forum
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I see this:
Status: Your application is being reviewed
Current Status Date: 12/11/2012
But then wonder... is it?
Status: Your application is being reviewed
Current Status Date: 12/11/2012
But then wonder... is it?
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Mine is stuck at UR 11/28/2012...dproduct wrote:I see this:
Status: Your application is being reviewed
Current Status Date: 12/11/2012
But then wonder... is it?
Wondering the same thing
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:31 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I'm also stuck on 11/28. And people with my stats have already been accepted, so not feeling too great about it. But whatever.RetakeFrenzy wrote:Mine is stuck at UR 11/28/2012...dproduct wrote:I see this:
Status: Your application is being reviewed
Current Status Date: 12/11/2012
But then wonder... is it?
Wondering the same thing
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
WUSTL and Notre Dame could probably be added to that list.skri65 wrote:With negotiation in mind, anyone have a guess what BC would consider peer schools besides BU? For example, UC Davis, Washington & Lee and William and Mary are all peer in terms of rankings, but would BC consider them peer considering BC's somewhat superior job prospects (biglaw) and location (major city)? Trying to see if BC would budge in terms of negotiation with either of the above three (or a full ride at schools in the 50-60 range)..
FWIW, no one has received scholly's yet from BC, this is all hypothetical..
Edit: UIUC? University of Indiana?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:40 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I'm not sure what your reference to NYU suggests.romanticegotist wrote:Gonna go out on a limb and say that possibly URM status changes things. Look at NYUs numbers and laugh.PedroPerezJr07 wrote:I got in last week.
I really threw a Hail Mary to a bunch of schools hoping to get lucky. I guess it really isn't just a numbers game with BC.
3.38/ 158
URM with pretty good softs. Hopefully I'll see some of you around in the fall.
Congrats to the admits and good luck to everyone else.
I'm positive the URM status changed things. No doubt about that, but I'd like to think my time spent outside of the classroom was a determining factor in what seems to be a pretty big exception. I'm certain there are enough URM applicants with numbers above both 25th percentiles (as opposed to mine, that are below both) they would be able to admit.
Just an opinion, though. Either way, whatever it was I'm happy I'm in and stoked for everybody else.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
PerezNY wrote:I'm not sure what your reference to NYU suggests.romanticegotist wrote:Gonna go out on a limb and say that possibly URM status changes things. Look at NYUs numbers and laugh.PedroPerezJr07 wrote:I got in last week.
I really threw a Hail Mary to a bunch of schools hoping to get lucky. I guess it really isn't just a numbers game with BC.
3.38/ 158
URM with pretty good softs. Hopefully I'll see some of you around in the fall.
Congrats to the admits and good luck to everyone else.
I'm positive the URM status changed things. No doubt about that, but I'd like to think my time spent outside of the classroom was a determining factor in what seems to be a pretty big exception. I'm certain there are enough URM applicants with numbers above both 25th percentiles (as opposed to mine, that are below both) they would be able to admit.
Just an opinion, though. Either way, whatever it was I'm happy I'm in and stoked for everybody else.
Oh. Hello there. Elephant in the room.
- andy261
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:50 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I think romanticegotist was disputing your statement that "it really isn't just a numbers game with BC." With BC and the vast majority of law schools, the correct statement would be that 'it isn't just a numbers game if you're a URM.' I do think your softs were likely a determining factor in getting into BC given your numbers, but a non-URM with the same numbers would most likely not have received that same chance.PerezNY wrote:I'm not sure what your reference to NYU suggests.romanticegotist wrote:Gonna go out on a limb and say that possibly URM status changes things. Look at NYUs numbers and laugh.PedroPerezJr07 wrote:I got in last week.
I really threw a Hail Mary to a bunch of schools hoping to get lucky. I guess it really isn't just a numbers game with BC.
3.38/ 158
URM with pretty good softs. Hopefully I'll see some of you around in the fall.
Congrats to the admits and good luck to everyone else.
I'm positive the URM status changed things. No doubt about that, but I'd like to think my time spent outside of the classroom was a determining factor in what seems to be a pretty big exception. I'm certain there are enough URM applicants with numbers above both 25th percentiles (as opposed to mine, that are below both) they would be able to admit.
Just an opinion, though. Either way, whatever it was I'm happy I'm in and stoked for everybody else.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:40 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Lol @ Bluegreenandy261 wrote:I think romanticegotist was disputing your statement that "it really isn't just a numbers game with BC." With BC and the vast majority of law schools, the correct statement would be that 'it isn't just a numbers game if you're a URM.' I do think your softs were likely a determining factor in getting into BC given your numbers, but a non-URM with the same numbers would most likely not have received that same chance.PerezNY wrote:I'm not sure what your reference to NYU suggests.romanticegotist wrote:Gonna go out on a limb and say that possibly URM status changes things. Look at NYUs numbers and laugh.PedroPerezJr07 wrote:I got in last week.
I really threw a Hail Mary to a bunch of schools hoping to get lucky. I guess it really isn't just a numbers game with BC.
3.38/ 158
URM with pretty good softs. Hopefully I'll see some of you around in the fall.
Congrats to the admits and good luck to everyone else.
I'm positive the URM status changed things. No doubt about that, but I'd like to think my time spent outside of the classroom was a determining factor in what seems to be a pretty big exception. I'm certain there are enough URM applicants with numbers above both 25th percentiles (as opposed to mine, that are below both) they would be able to admit.
Just an opinion, though. Either way, whatever it was I'm happy I'm in and stoked for everybody else.
@andy261 Well said. It is what it is. I wasn't upset by any of the posts or anything, btw... all good!
- andy261
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:50 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Yeah regardless of any of our opinions, it is what it is. Congrats!PerezNY wrote:It is what it is. I wasn't upset by any of the posts or anything, btw... all good!
- romanticegotist
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Yeah I'm a pretty big believer that law schools look at too narrow a range of applicants anyway so no doubting your bona fides. Maybe I'm just growing bitter as I keep refreshing status pages.
- md22
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Does everyone else have "First Deposit" and "Second Deposit" under the Fees section on their Applicant Status page?
Hoping against hope that this might be a positive sign but I doubt it's anything significant!
Hoping against hope that this might be a positive sign but I doubt it's anything significant!
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
First Deposit 0.00 .00md22 wrote:Does everyone else have "First Deposit" and "Second Deposit" under the Fees section on their Applicant Status page?
Hoping against hope that this might be a positive sign but I doubt it's anything significant!
Second Deposit 0.00 .00
sorry dude
- md22
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Haha no worries figured it meant nothing!dproduct wrote:First Deposit 0.00 .00md22 wrote:Does everyone else have "First Deposit" and "Second Deposit" under the Fees section on their Applicant Status page?
Hoping against hope that this might be a positive sign but I doubt it's anything significant!
Second Deposit 0.00 .00
sorry dude
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:21 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Pretty late to the game with this forum, but just thought I'd add my two cents. Realized that BC Admissions must take into account a lot more than just the hard stats. I got my acceptance via email two days ago, after BC placed my application on hold in December and asked to see my fall grades. I have a good gpa at a competitive NESCAC school, but my LSAT was a little low for BC. They must have really liked my resume and essay! Haven't received my packet in the mail yet, but hoping it'll come soon...So excited!!
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Congratulations!! Mind sharing stats?Portatx wrote:Pretty late to the game with this forum, but just thought I'd add my two cents. Realized that BC Admissions must take into account a lot more than just the hard stats. I got my acceptance via email two days ago, after BC placed my application on hold in December and asked to see my fall grades. I have a good gpa at a competitive NESCAC school, but my LSAT was a little low for BC. They must have really liked my resume and essay! Haven't received my packet in the mail yet, but hoping it'll come soon...So excited!!
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:21 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Not at all! I have a 3.67 gpa overall at a NESCAC school in New England. Last semester however I received a 3.85, which BC must have felt good about, since they only placed my application on hold until I could send in my grades. I have a 161 LSAT. I was surprised when I was admitted, although the Admissions committee had been in contact with me a few times before and had been very positive and warm. Must have been my resume and personal statement that helped me out...
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
.
Last edited by skri65 on Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
I sure hope they are looking beyond the numbers.... 151/3.41 non trad URM here. I got accepted to W&L last week which gave me some hope for BC.skri65 wrote:Congrats. Looks like BC has been looking beyond numbers this year, hopefully it doesn't hurt them too much in terms of ranking. If you don't mind me asking, are you a URM?Portatx wrote:Not at all! I have a 3.67 gpa overall at a NESCAC school in New England. Last semester however I received a 3.85, which BC must have felt good about, since they only placed my application on hold until I could send in my grades. I have a 161 LSAT. I was surprised when I was admitted, although the Admissions committee had been in contact with me a few times before and had been very positive and warm. Must have been my resume and personal statement that helped me out...
I come from a fellow Jesuit college and I wonder if that plays well with them at all...
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:21 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Nope. I am a non-URM. Again, it must have been my resume/p.s./recommendations that put me over the edge.
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Wow impressive. You must have wrote a killer PS and done some great stuff with your spare time. Good luck with the rest of your cycle!Portatx wrote:Nope. I am a non-URM. Again, it must have been my resume/p.s./recommendations that put me over the edge.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
+1skri65 wrote:Wow impressive. You must have wrote a killer PS and done some great stuff with your spare time. Good luck with the rest of your cycle!Portatx wrote:Nope. I am a non-URM. Again, it must have been my resume/p.s./recommendations that put me over the edge.
Here's t hoping I'll hear from them by the end of the week...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Oh shit, status just changed within the last 30 minutes from UR 12/6 to "Decision Rendered" 1/17
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Have they "rendered" anyone a rejection yet?
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
FranielMcbrodude wrote:Has anyone else's 'decision rendered' update readIf not, I'm thinking I was rejected...A decision has been made on your application to Boston College Law School by the Admissions Committee. A decision letter will be mailed via U.S. Postal Service within 3 days from the Decision Status Date and will be sent to your PERMANENT address. If a decision is made after January 15, 2013, the Decision letter was mailed to your current address.
Crap. Mine just says
A decision has been rendered on your application to Boston College Law School. Decisions will be sent via e-mail.
Best,
Boston College Law School
Admissions Office
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:40 am
Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants
Good luck! I'm rooting for you!JesusChrist wrote:FranielMcbrodude wrote:Has anyone else's 'decision rendered' update readIf not, I'm thinking I was rejected...A decision has been made on your application to Boston College Law School by the Admissions Committee. A decision letter will be mailed via U.S. Postal Service within 3 days from the Decision Status Date and will be sent to your PERMANENT address. If a decision is made after January 15, 2013, the Decision letter was mailed to your current address.
Crap. Mine just says
A decision has been rendered on your application to Boston College Law School. Decisions will be sent via e-mail.
Best,
Boston College Law School
Admissions Office
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login