BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
laura0862
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby laura0862 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:01 pm

AlanShore, I got the same email from BC. At least we weren't rejected! I think they just need more time (since they originally said by mid-December). Probably won't hurt to send in a LOCI though.

User avatar
danitt
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby danitt » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:10 pm

AlanShore wrote:got an email from BC saying they are putting my app on hold till Jan/after Jan and I should expect a decision no later than mid-feb.

Also held.

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:14 pm

.
Last edited by skri65 on Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:15 pm

laura0862 wrote:AlanShore, I got the same email from BC. At least we weren't rejected! I think they just need more time (since they originally said by mid-December). Probably won't hurt to send in a LOCI though.


Numbers?

User avatar
danitt
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby danitt » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:17 pm

skri65 wrote:
danitt wrote:
AlanShore wrote:got an email from BC saying they are putting my app on hold till Jan/after Jan and I should expect a decision no later than mid-feb.

Also held.


You both have superior numbers for BC. This is very interesting. I'm still under review since 11/28 with much worse #s at 164/3.6

I'm a reverse splitter, but have managed to do well this cycle I think based on a lot of years of preftigious work experience and the URM (debatable because I'm an international) factor. I would blame BC if they rejected me based on my LSAT score alone so I'm glad to be held.

User avatar
goden
Posts: 2275
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby goden » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:17 pm

Ugh what's with the holds? Still UR 12/13.

User avatar
AlanShore
Posts: 1505
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby AlanShore » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:18 pm

skri65 wrote:
danitt wrote:
AlanShore wrote:got an email from BC saying they are putting my app on hold till Jan/after Jan and I should expect a decision no later than mid-feb.

Also held.


You both have superior numbers for BC. This is very interesting. I'm still under review since 11/28 with much worse #s at 164/3.6

I think thats a good sign, skri. BC is very unpredictable. They might really like your application!

User avatar
BlazersTime
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:56 am

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby BlazersTime » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:32 pm

This is all very strange. I'm also still under review since 11/28 with worse numbers 3.67/162

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby TheThriller » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:33 pm

sup guys, held as well. I am correct in saying that this is not a waitlist right?

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:39 pm

TheThriller wrote:sup guys, held as well. I am correct in saying that this is not a waitlist right?


Can't answer your question, but numbers? Seems like the other guys were close to autoadmit

ks2499
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:40 am

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby ks2499 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:41 pm

TheThriller wrote:sup guys, held as well. I am correct in saying that this is not a waitlist right?


Correct. Hold means you are still in the pool of applicants and will receive a decision, which might include a waitlist, after January (not sure if they gave a specific date in the email?).

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby TheThriller » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:43 pm

They are currently reviewing my application as a 2.97/167 but once LSAC updates my gpa it will be 3.05/167

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:45 pm

ks2499 wrote:
TheThriller wrote:sup guys, held as well. I am correct in saying that this is not a waitlist right?


Correct. Hold means you are still in the pool of applicants and will receive a decision, which might include a waitlist, after January (not sure if they gave a specific date in the email?).


Interesting. What is the point of a hold? As in, why not just keep these people in the applicant pool and have them remain "under review"?

ks2499
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:40 am

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby ks2499 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:47 pm

skri65 wrote:
ks2499 wrote:
TheThriller wrote:sup guys, held as well. I am correct in saying that this is not a waitlist right?


Correct. Hold means you are still in the pool of applicants and will receive a decision, which might include a waitlist, after January (not sure if they gave a specific date in the email?).


Interesting. What is the point of a hold? As in, why not just keep these people in the applicant pool and have them remain "under review"?


I think it's because BC sent out an email telling people they would receive a decision by mid-December and are trying to fix their mistake now that they aren't really ready after all.

I didn't get either email, for what it's worth.

User avatar
AlanShore
Posts: 1505
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby AlanShore » Wed Dec 19, 2012 3:51 pm

skri65 wrote:
ks2499 wrote:
TheThriller wrote:sup guys, held as well. I am correct in saying that this is not a waitlist right?


Correct. Hold means you are still in the pool of applicants and will receive a decision, which might include a waitlist, after January (not sure if they gave a specific date in the email?).


Interesting. What is the point of a hold? As in, why not just keep these people in the applicant pool and have them remain "under review"?

I'm not sure but in previous years they put you under review again sometime in January or February so its as if they skip us for awhile.

User avatar
The-Specs
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby The-Specs » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:04 pm

Held today as well.

164/3.57

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:12 pm

.
Last edited by skri65 on Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

JesusChrist
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:44 am

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby JesusChrist » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:24 pm

My guess is that they want to see how the numbers turn out for the December LSAT. And the scheduled score release for the Dec administration is the first week of Jan. I'm sure after that, the floodgates will open.

User avatar
michaelm55
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:52 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby michaelm55 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:00 pm

Held today. Bummed. Take a look at my numbers if it helps any of you other "held"applicants.

User avatar
AlanShore
Posts: 1505
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby AlanShore » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:06 pm

michaelm55 wrote:Held today. Bummed. Take a look at my numbers if it helps any of you other "held"applicants.

Aww man. you have really high numbers..

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:55 pm

Well, my status updated to under review for the second time sometime this afternoon. Anyone else? Initially UR 11/28. If so, numbers?

User avatar
zorro.99
Posts: 91
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 2:05 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby zorro.99 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:56 am

Under review for the third time today.... 162 3.7 - don't have high hopes

skri65
Posts: 484
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby skri65 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:11 am

.
Last edited by skri65 on Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

ks2499
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:40 am

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby ks2499 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:20 am

skri65 wrote:Well, my status updated to under review for the second time sometime this afternoon. Anyone else? Initially UR 11/28. If so, numbers?


I also had my initial review date as 11/28 and I didn't update yesterday.

User avatar
teachmehowtoraji
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: BC 2012-2013 Applicants

Postby teachmehowtoraji » Thu Dec 20, 2012 12:18 pm

ks2499 wrote:
skri65 wrote:Well, my status updated to under review for the second time sometime this afternoon. Anyone else? Initially UR 11/28. If so, numbers?


I also had my initial review date as 11/28 and I didn't update yesterday.



I didn't update from 11/28 yet either.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aaron1621, bleakchimera2, BobBoblaw, chasima, ChodeAnalBead, dala77, guybourdin, JoshLyman13, jtn123, lillawyer2, pandaaa, Sawtooth, Smc1994 and 41 guests