JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
AMEN!
JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
PinkLotus wrote:JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
If it was the same person, how has she not been fired yet? LOL.
PinkLotus wrote:JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
If it was the same person, how has she not been fired yet? LOL.
stillwater wrote:PinkLotus wrote:JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
If it was the same person, how has she not been fired yet? LOL.
they're trying to keep the soft-hearted away.
dproduct wrote:PinkLotus wrote:JesusChrist wrote:BCLS wrote:
I wonder if it's laura. She was so condescending to me. I was really upset after that meeting.
ugh, fucking Laura. Amirite guys?
If it was the same person, how has she not been fired yet? LOL.
THIS Laura? (Go down a bit).
PinkLotus wrote:Yikes, looks like a possible remedy for equitable estoppel is in order (you'll understand what I mean when you take 1L Contracts)
dproduct wrote:PinkLotus wrote:Yikes, looks like a possible remedy for equitable estoppel is in order (you'll understand what I mean when you take 1L Contracts)
Brain hurts.
1. Equitable Estoppel—founded upon concept of equity and fair dealing
a. Person may not deny existence of state of facts if he intentionally led another to believe particular circumstance to be true and to rely upon such belief to his detriment. Elements:
i. Party to be estopped must be apprised of facts
ii. He must intend that his conduct be acted upon
iii. Î ignorant of true facts
Πmust rely on ∆’s conduct to his injury (remedy limited to reliance damages)
PinkLotus wrote:dproduct wrote:PinkLotus wrote:Yikes, looks like a possible remedy for equitable estoppel is in order (you'll understand what I mean when you take 1L Contracts)
Brain hurts.
From, my Ks outline (aced the class, lol):1. Equitable Estoppel—founded upon concept of equity and fair dealing
a. Person may not deny existence of state of facts if he intentionally led another to believe particular circumstance to be true and to rely upon such belief to his detriment. Elements:
i. Party to be estopped must be apprised of facts
ii. He must intend that his conduct be acted upon
iii. Î ignorant of true facts
Πmust rely on ∆’s conduct to his injury (remedy limited to reliance damages)
dproduct wrote:PinkLotus wrote:dproduct wrote:PinkLotus wrote:Yikes, looks like a possible remedy for equitable estoppel is in order (you'll understand what I mean when you take 1L Contracts)
Brain hurts.
From, my Ks outline (aced the class, lol):1. Equitable Estoppel—founded upon concept of equity and fair dealing
a. Person may not deny existence of state of facts if he intentionally led another to believe particular circumstance to be true and to rely upon such belief to his detriment. Elements:
i. Party to be estopped must be apprised of facts
ii. He must intend that his conduct be acted upon
iii. Î ignorant of true facts
Πmust rely on ∆’s conduct to his injury (remedy limited to reliance damages)
omg I'm learnin' ya'll
zorro.99 wrote:I've now had five or six complete updates including one today... anyone else in the same boat?
Psib337 wrote:Waitlisted today via e-mail
toothbrush wrote:not to be an ass but i missed the call today and my voicemail isn't set up
is there anything noteworthy besides "you're in" that they say ?
should i expect a follow up email or is the next thing i receive snail mail ?
toothbrush wrote:toothbrush wrote:not to be an ass but i missed the call today and my voicemail isn't set up
is there anything noteworthy besides "you're in" that they say ?
should i expect a follow up email or is the next thing i receive snail mail ?
toothbrush wrote:not to be an ass but i missed the call today and my voicemail isn't set up
is there anything noteworthy besides "you're in" that they say ?
should i expect a follow up email or is the next thing i receive snail mail ?
Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists�
Users browsing this forum: tr0d and 10 guests