Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
ajax

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by ajax » Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:37 pm

TLSwag wrote:
dingbat wrote:
ajax wrote:According to this thread for the 2011-2012 cycle there were indeed substantial scholarships handed out post June (90k plus).
Just to add a slight correction, last year the maximum was $30k/year, or $90k total
note: Fordham gives out two full rides per year

Where did you obtain this information?
8)[/quote]


Do you work for Fordham in any capacity? I'm just curious, because for you to have that info seems pretty strange.[/quote]

Yo ajax, just vouching for dingbat saw this pop up on the latest posts link..

I received $30K/year last year and before i ultimately turned it down, i asked for more and was told my the assistant dean that was the most they could possibly give out...

HTH[/quote]

Ahh there we go. Thanks TLswag!

User avatar
Gemini

Gold
Posts: 1944
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by Gemini » Sun Jan 06, 2013 1:52 am

djlmjs22 wrote:I got a letter today for $10,000 a year. I understand my numbers are not fantastic (164, 3.93), but is it worth trying for more? I'm not trying to be ungrateful, it's just the only way I can go there. I'm going to wait until other schools start coming out with $ but I would love some opinions on this
That is actually a REALLY high award for your LSAT score. They DO care more about your LSAT than your GPA. I sincerely doubt you can get more.

You can try, though! If you receive more from a similarly ranked school, call them near the acceptance deposit due date.

User avatar
dingbat

Gold
Posts: 4974
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by dingbat » Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:03 am

Gemini wrote:
djlmjs22 wrote:I got a letter today for $10,000 a year. I understand my numbers are not fantastic (164, 3.93), but is it worth trying for more? I'm not trying to be ungrateful, it's just the only way I can go there. I'm going to wait until other schools start coming out with $ but I would love some opinions on this
That is actually a REALLY high award for your LSAT score. They DO care more about your LSAT than your GPA. I sincerely doubt you can get more.

You can try, though! If you receive more from a similarly ranked school, call them near the acceptance deposit due date.
The GPA probably earned money, but that LSAT doesn't.

Logically speaking, a school might be willing to pay X for a high GPA and Y for a high LSAT; having both a high LSAT and a high GPA could then get X+Y, but being limited on either side means being capped at X or Y.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl

Gold
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by alwayssunnyinfl » Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:16 am

dingbat wrote:
Gemini wrote:
djlmjs22 wrote:I got a letter today for $10,000 a year. I understand my numbers are not fantastic (164, 3.93), but is it worth trying for more? I'm not trying to be ungrateful, it's just the only way I can go there. I'm going to wait until other schools start coming out with $ but I would love some opinions on this
That is actually a REALLY high award for your LSAT score. They DO care more about your LSAT than your GPA. I sincerely doubt you can get more.

You can try, though! If you receive more from a similarly ranked school, call them near the acceptance deposit due date.
The GPA probably earned money, but that LSAT doesn't.

Logically speaking, a school might be willing to pay X for a high GPA and Y for a high LSAT; having both a high LSAT and a high GPA could then get X+Y, but being limited on either side means being capped at X or Y.
Just kill the cat already, jeez.

User avatar
dingbat

Gold
Posts: 4974
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by dingbat » Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:17 am

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:Just kill the cat already, jeez.
wrong thread, but :lol:

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Gemini

Gold
Posts: 1944
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by Gemini » Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:44 am

dingbat wrote:
Gemini wrote:
djlmjs22 wrote:I got a letter today for $10,000 a year. I understand my numbers are not fantastic (164, 3.93), but is it worth trying for more? I'm not trying to be ungrateful, it's just the only way I can go there. I'm going to wait until other schools start coming out with $ but I would love some opinions on this
That is actually a REALLY high award for your LSAT score. They DO care more about your LSAT than your GPA. I sincerely doubt you can get more.

You can try, though! If you receive more from a similarly ranked school, call them near the acceptance deposit due date.
The GPA probably earned money, but that LSAT doesn't.

Logically speaking, a school might be willing to pay X for a high GPA and Y for a high LSAT; having both a high LSAT and a high GPA could then get X+Y, but being limited on either side means being capped at X or Y.
True. I meant it more in the way of a 169/3.3 will get more money than a 164/4.0.

User avatar
mg7

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:15 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by mg7 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:52 am

Checking in here. Applied a few days ago. 167/3.42

User avatar
patienunderstanding

Bronze
Posts: 250
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:45 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by patienunderstanding » Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:11 pm

My status checker updated to today... what does that mean? Is decision coming soon?

CR2012

Bronze
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:27 am

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by CR2012 » Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:44 pm

Checking in!

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


sadday

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:55 am

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by sadday » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:24 pm

166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?

ajax

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by ajax » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:28 pm

sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'll bet you 500 dollars you are in. Care to hedge?

The way I see it is that there are fewer 166s out there than 3.67s (Fordhams 75%s). Scarcity has value. Also, applications are down another 20% this cycle, so we could very likely see a decrease in those 75%s.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

If I were you I wouldn't be worried about getting in. I would be thinking about whether or not I want to pay sticker for Fordham, but that is for another thread...
Last edited by ajax on Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mg7

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:15 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by mg7 » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:28 pm

sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'd say so.

sadday

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:55 am

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by sadday » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:35 pm

ajax wrote:
sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'll bet you 500 dollars you are in. Care to hedge?

The way I see it is that there are fewer 166s out there than 3.67s (Fordhams 75%s). Scarcity has value. Also, applications are down another 20% this cycle, so we could very likely see a decrease in those 75%s.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

If I were you I wouldn't be worried about getting in. I would be thinking about whether or not I want to pay sticker for Fordham, but that is for another thread...
If I did get in, you don't think I'd get the 15 or 30k discount?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
dproduct

Gold
Posts: 4078
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by dproduct » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:38 pm

sadday wrote:
ajax wrote:
sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'll bet you 500 dollars you are in. Care to hedge?

The way I see it is that there are fewer 166s out there than 3.67s (Fordhams 75%s). Scarcity has value. Also, applications are down another 20% this cycle, so we could very likely see a decrease in those 75%s.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

If I were you I wouldn't be worried about getting in. I would be thinking about whether or not I want to pay sticker for Fordham, but that is for another thread...
If I did get in, you don't think I'd get the 15 or 30k discount?
As a fellow 166er... I sure hope so.

User avatar
dingbat

Gold
Posts: 4974
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by dingbat » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:39 pm

sadday wrote:
ajax wrote:
sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'll bet you 500 dollars you are in. Care to hedge?

The way I see it is that there are fewer 166s out there than 3.67s (Fordhams 75%s). Scarcity has value. Also, applications are down another 20% this cycle, so we could very likely see a decrease in those 75%s.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

If I were you I wouldn't be worried about getting in. I would be thinking about whether or not I want to pay sticker for Fordham, but that is for another thread...
If I did get in, you don't think I'd get the 15 or 30k discount?
You probably won't get the 30k discount. For that both your scores need to be above (or at least close to) both 75%s

ajax

Bronze
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by ajax » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:43 pm

dingbat wrote:
sadday wrote:
ajax wrote:
sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'll bet you 500 dollars you are in. Care to hedge?

The way I see it is that there are fewer 166s out there than 3.67s (Fordhams 75%s). Scarcity has value. Also, applications are down another 20% this cycle, so we could very likely see a decrease in those 75%s.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

If I were you I wouldn't be worried about getting in. I would be thinking about whether or not I want to pay sticker for Fordham, but that is for another thread...
If I did get in, you don't think I'd get the 15 or 30k discount?
You probably won't get the 30k discount. For that both your scores need to be above (or at least close to) both 75%s
http://fordham.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... r=desc&p=3

Not necessarily.

sadday

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:55 am

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by sadday » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:46 pm

When do Dec takers usually find out? Mid-March?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
dingbat

Gold
Posts: 4974
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by dingbat » Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:51 pm

ajax wrote:
dingbat wrote:
sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
You probably won't get the 30k discount. For that both your scores need to be above (or at least close to) both 75%s
http://fordham.lawschoolnumbers.com/app ... r=desc&p=3

Not necessarily.
Sorry, I was thinking $30k/year, not $30k total
(though, it appears I'm still wrong)

sadday

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:55 am

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by sadday » Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:07 pm

dproduct wrote:
sadday wrote:
ajax wrote:
sadday wrote:166, 3.37 , applied, do I have decent shot?
I'll bet you 500 dollars you are in. Care to hedge?

The way I see it is that there are fewer 166s out there than 3.67s (Fordhams 75%s). Scarcity has value. Also, applications are down another 20% this cycle, so we could very likely see a decrease in those 75%s.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nUnc#gid=0

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

If I were you I wouldn't be worried about getting in. I would be thinking about whether or not I want to pay sticker for Fordham, but that is for another thread...
If I did get in, you don't think I'd get the 15 or 30k discount?
As a fellow 166er... I sure hope so.
166 is a weird score. 163-165 you're in the mid 60s, 167-169 you're in the upper 60s. 166 and you're in the 60s twilight zone.

User avatar
happyshapy

Bronze
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:41 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by happyshapy » Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:05 pm

3.9 159, 167

i'm hoping to get 30k/year. any one with similar numbers this cycle successful?

njpark

New
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:45 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by njpark » Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:04 pm

Applied PT last night and received my status checker this morning! *fingers crossed*

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by ph5354a » Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:36 pm

Kathryn Espiritu ‏@KathrynForLaw
Happy Tuesday all! @FLSAdmissions is back in full swing...first big batch of decision for #2013 out later today.

https://twitter.com/KathrynForLaw

Oh Kathryn. If only there were a Tweeter like you at every school.

User avatar
cutebookwormxoxo

New
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by cutebookwormxoxo » Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:00 pm

ph5354a wrote:Kathryn Espiritu ‏@KathrynForLaw
Happy Tuesday all! @FLSAdmissions is back in full swing...first big batch of decision for #2013 out later today.

https://twitter.com/KathrynForLaw

Oh Kathryn. If only there were a Tweeter like you at every school.
Well that's nerve wracking.

woolfiot

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:33 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by woolfiot » Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:02 pm

is the admitted students website down?

cgw

Bronze
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:06 pm

Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)

Post by cgw » Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:32 pm

ph5354a wrote:Kathryn Espiritu ‏@KathrynForLaw
Happy Tuesday all! @FLSAdmissions is back in full swing...first big batch of decision for #2013 out later today.

https://twitter.com/KathrynForLaw

Oh Kathryn. If only there were a Tweeter like you at every school.
Wish I hadn't read this. Keep trying to status check now but the website is not working :(

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”