Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
boblawlob
Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby boblawlob » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:02 pm

T20hopeful89 wrote:maybe today is another decision day? One can only hope...

It is.


Ding'd. Worth a shot.

wwUSMC84
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:56 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby wwUSMC84 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:03 pm

Just recieved my decision letter; Held. Not Surprised.

User avatar
luxurylawyer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby luxurylawyer » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:07 pm

boblawlob wrote:
T20hopeful89 wrote:maybe today is another decision day?

It is.



...And cue the obsessive refreshing.

T20hopeful89
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:26 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby T20hopeful89 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:10 pm

luxurylawyer wrote:
boblawlob wrote:
T20hopeful89 wrote:maybe today is another decision day?

It is.



...And cue the obsessive refreshing.



Obviously, I still have nothing....I guess they figure that if they've made me wait 5.5 months already, why not longer? =( At least put me out of my misery!!!!
Last edited by T20hopeful89 on Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
luxurylawyer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby luxurylawyer » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:12 pm

T20hopeful89 wrote:
Obviously, I still have nothing....I guess they figure that if they've made me wait 5.5 months already, why not long? =( At least put me out of my misery!!!!


Still two hours of day left. Plenty of time.

helpplease
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby helpplease » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:17 pm

T20hopeful89 wrote:
luxurylawyer wrote:
boblawlob wrote:
T20hopeful89 wrote:maybe today is another decision day?

It is.



...And cue the obsessive refreshing.



Obviously, I still have nothing....I guess they figure that if they've made me wait 5.5 months already, why not longer? =( At least put me out of my misery!!!!


Wow. No news is good news hopefully!

T20hopeful89
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:26 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby T20hopeful89 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:21 pm

helpplease wrote:
Wow. No news is good news hopefully!



Just is odd because of the number of decisions that have gone out. I feel like if they were going to accept me, they would have done so already.

User avatar
luxurylawyer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby luxurylawyer » Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:24 pm

T20hopeful89 wrote:
helpplease wrote:
Wow. No news is good news hopefully!



Just is odd because of the number of decisions that have gone out. I feel like if they were going to accept me, they would have done so already.


If they were certain they were going to reject you, they would have already as well. Stay positive.

onionz
Posts: 407
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 11:22 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby onionz » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:07 pm

crumpetsandtea wrote:
mrizza wrote:I don't use twitter for anything personal and i have my FB relatively private, and I try to watch what I say here. Honestly though I think they can out any of us with minimal research, so knowing i'm outted might be better in the long run. That presumed anonymity could get someone in trouble.

I def know who you are on fb :wink:

#CREEPER #northwesterndifference #nothingissafe


haha he doesn't exactly make it very difficult.

T20hopeful89
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:26 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby T20hopeful89 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:08 pm

luxurylawyer wrote:
T20hopeful89 wrote:
helpplease wrote:
Wow. No news is good news hopefully!



Just is odd because of the number of decisions that have gone out. I feel like if they were going to accept me, they would have done so already.


If they were certain they were going to reject you, they would have already as well. Stay positive.



Easier said than done! I assume I'm heading to the WL pile, which they have yet to release.

User avatar
luxurylawyer
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby luxurylawyer » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:10 pm

T20hopeful89 wrote:
Easier said than done! I assume I'm heading to the WL pile, which they have yet to release.


A voice in my head is telling me the same thing. Attempting to ignore that asshole.

denglese
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:52 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby denglese » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:30 pm

Meanwhile I'm just going to be stuck at "complete" for all time and eternity. Good luck to folks getting decisions today!

FlowBro
Posts: 334
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:15 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby FlowBro » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:33 pm

Any admits hear back on scolly's yet?

User avatar
rinkrat19
Posts: 13912
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby rinkrat19 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:46 pm

FlowBro wrote:Any admits hear back on scolly's yet?

Aside from the 1-year-deferral and ED packages, most of the money comes out in a big rush over a couple of days. Last year it was around April 1. (Mar 30-Apr 2, if memory serves)

talesofyore
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby talesofyore » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:26 pm

wwUSMC84 wrote:Just recieved my decision letter; Held. Not Surprised.


I'm started to become a little skeptical that 'held' isn't the same as 'waitlisted.'

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby Cobretti » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:30 pm

crumpetsandtea wrote:
mrizza wrote:I don't use twitter for anything personal and i have my FB relatively private, and I try to watch what I say here. Honestly though I think they can out any of us with minimal research, so knowing i'm outted might be better in the long run. That presumed anonymity could get someone in trouble.

I def know who you are on fb :wink:

#CREEPER #northwesterndifference #nothingissafe

I saw we had friends in common and asked CC who you were already :wink:

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby Cobretti » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:33 pm

boblawlob wrote:
T20hopeful89 wrote:maybe today is another decision day? One can only hope...

It is.


Ding'd. Worth a shot.

sorry man

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby risa » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:48 pm

I guess I am probably sounding entitled here (sorry) but I am really confused by my lack of word from NU. Given my work experience (8+ yrs) I'd have honestly thought at the beginning of this cycle that I had a better shot at NU than any other T14 schools. I have heard back now from every school but NU, Harvard & Stanford. Even H had the decency to hold me. @johann why u no love me? I really, really like NU but I feel like the chances of me being able to go there are becoming less and less as time goes on.

(submitted early november, complete since mid-jan thanks to lengthy alumni-interview scheduling process. Le sigh.)

LRGhost
Posts: 1869
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby LRGhost » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:50 pm

Just sent a Why NU and my Hold essays. The 'famous' essay wasn't so bad once I got going but I still feel incredibly full of myself in it.

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby Cobretti » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:52 pm

risa wrote:I guess I am probably sounding entitled here (sorry) but I am really confused by my lack of word from NU. Given my work experience (8+ yrs) I'd have honestly thought at the beginning of this cycle that I had a better shot at NU than any other T14 schools. I have heard back now from every school but NU, Harvard & Stanford. Even H had the decency to hold me. @johann why u no love me? I really, really like NU but I feel like the chances of me being able to go there are becoming less and less as time goes on.

(submitted early november, complete since mid-jan thanks to lengthy alumni-interview scheduling process. Le sigh.)

your lsn looks like you have a strong PI focus. was your PS focused on PI? if so they may be YPing you since NU tends to matriculate more biglaw focused people.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby risa » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:01 pm

mrizza wrote:
risa wrote:I guess I am probably sounding entitled here (sorry) but I am really confused by my lack of word from NU. Given my work experience (8+ yrs) I'd have honestly thought at the beginning of this cycle that I had a better shot at NU than any other T14 schools. I have heard back now from every school but NU, Harvard & Stanford. Even H had the decency to hold me. @johann why u no love me? I really, really like NU but I feel like the chances of me being able to go there are becoming less and less as time goes on.

(submitted early november, complete since mid-jan thanks to lengthy alumni-interview scheduling process. Le sigh.)

your lsn looks like you have a strong PI focus. was your PS focused on PI? if so they may be YPing you since NU tends to matriculate more biglaw focused people.

Yes, it was very PI-focused. I guess that could be it, though I never thought my numbers were strong enough to be YP'ed anywhere! I thought my alumni interview went very well and we talked a lot about specific clinics and programs at NU that interested me (some of which my interviewer had participated in), but that said, my application itself was not at all tailored to "Why NU." I guess you could be right, though even a hold or WL might feel better at this point than feeling like my app has been lost :|

ETA: All that said, I feel very lucky with the options I have. I hope I don't sound ungrateful or too entitled with my venting.

User avatar
rinkrat19
Posts: 13912
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby rinkrat19 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:07 pm

risa wrote:
mrizza wrote:
risa wrote:I guess I am probably sounding entitled here (sorry) but I am really confused by my lack of word from NU. Given my work experience (8+ yrs) I'd have honestly thought at the beginning of this cycle that I had a better shot at NU than any other T14 schools. I have heard back now from every school but NU, Harvard & Stanford. Even H had the decency to hold me. @johann why u no love me? I really, really like NU but I feel like the chances of me being able to go there are becoming less and less as time goes on.

(submitted early november, complete since mid-jan thanks to lengthy alumni-interview scheduling process. Le sigh.)

your lsn looks like you have a strong PI focus. was your PS focused on PI? if so they may be YPing you since NU tends to matriculate more biglaw focused people.

Yes, it was very PI-focused. I guess that could be it, though I never thought my numbers were strong enough to be YP'ed anywhere! I thought my alumni interview went very well and we talked a lot about specific clinics and programs at NU that interested me (some of which my interviewer had participated in), but that said, my application itself was not at all tailored to "Why NU." I guess you could be right, though even a hold or WL might feel better at this point than feeling like my app has been lost :|

ETA: All that said, I feel very lucky with the options I have. I hope I don't sound ungrateful or too entitled with my venting.
I really doubt PI would have hurt you.

You're a reverse splitter. Those are more common than splitters. They probably keep some of both in reserve until they see how many of each kind they need to admit to maintain both medians.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby risa » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:21 pm

rinkrat19 wrote:You're a reverse splitter. Those are more common than splitters. They probably keep some of both in reserve until they see how many of each kind they need to admit to maintain both medians.

Am I? I have never been quite sure what the term means but never though of myself as one! Reverse splitter is high GPA lower LSAT?

User avatar
rinkrat19
Posts: 13912
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby rinkrat19 » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:31 pm

risa wrote:
rinkrat19 wrote:You're a reverse splitter. Those are more common than splitters. They probably keep some of both in reserve until they see how many of each kind they need to admit to maintain both medians.

Am I? I have never been quite sure what the term means but never though of myself as one! Reverse splitter is high GPA lower LSAT?

Splitters have LSAT over the median/GPA under the median. Reverse splitters have GPA over the median/LSAT under the median.

There are more high GPAs than high LSATs, so splitters are more rare than reverse splitters.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Northwestern Law C/O 2016 (2012-2013 Applicants)

Postby risa » Tue Mar 19, 2013 8:47 pm

rinkrat19 wrote:
risa wrote:
rinkrat19 wrote:You're a reverse splitter. Those are more common than splitters. They probably keep some of both in reserve until they see how many of each kind they need to admit to maintain both medians.

Am I? I have never been quite sure what the term means but never though of myself as one! Reverse splitter is high GPA lower LSAT?

Splitters have LSAT over the median/GPA under the median. Reverse splitters have GPA over the median/LSAT under the median.

There are more high GPAs than high LSATs, so splitters are more rare than reverse splitters.

Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying :) I don't think I actually realized that whether or not you're a splitter may differ from school to school.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AustinLu and 16 guests