UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
Dman

Bronze
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:28 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Dman » Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:27 am

KingFish wrote:
yodamiked wrote:What are people's thoughts on UCLA not ranking its students? In one way, if you're hanging around median it helps you out, but if you manage to kick butt and make it into the top 10%, my concern is that you're not going to get the same opportunities you would at a school that ranks its students. Seems like it lowers your risks, but puts everyone (even those who may not deserve it) at more equal footing. Thoughts?
If you get good enough grades to be top 10%, the employers will be able to tell just from looking at your transcript and seeing all the A's. Maybe a current Bruin can answer, but I doubt it hurts students at all. Most top schools don't rank right?

Bruin alum here. Not ranking has no effect on hiring by firms in California. Firms are pretty clear what GPAs approximate requisite rank cutoffs. There might be some confusion if you were applying outside of Cali markets but as other said if you were in top 10% range employers will know. And if you are medium, a UCLA degree is not going to help you much against local schools regardless of rank.

LittleTree

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by LittleTree » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:00 am

The dean told me they rank the top 10 students numerically and give rankings every 5% up to the top 25%

User avatar
boblawlob

Silver
Posts: 519
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by boblawlob » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:11 am

Dman wrote:
KingFish wrote:
yodamiked wrote:What are people's thoughts on UCLA not ranking its students? In one way, if you're hanging around median it helps you out, but if you manage to kick butt and make it into the top 10%, my concern is that you're not going to get the same opportunities you would at a school that ranks its students. Seems like it lowers your risks, but puts everyone (even those who may not deserve it) at more equal footing. Thoughts?
If you get good enough grades to be top 10%, the employers will be able to tell just from looking at your transcript and seeing all the A's. Maybe a current Bruin can answer, but I doubt it hurts students at all. Most top schools don't rank right?

Bruin alum here. Not ranking has no effect on hiring by firms in California. Firms are pretty clear what GPAs approximate requisite rank cutoffs. There might be some confusion if you were applying outside of Cali markets but as other said if you were in top 10% range employers will know. And if you are medium, a UCLA degree is not going to help you much against local schools regardless of rank.
So even top 50% at UCLA won't be remotely any good?

Dman

Bronze
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:28 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Dman » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:12 am

LittleTree wrote:The dean told me they rank the top 10 students numerically and give rankings every 5% up to the top 25%
The top 10 students ranked part has always been the case. I did not mention it because it is best to not fantasize about such things. Of course you can get your rank if you apply for clerkships but you are required to sign a non-disclosure so, that rank cannot be given to employers outside of that context. The 5% up to 25% thing, I have never heard of, it is also not listed on the schools website in ranking https://www.law.ucla.edu/career-service ... rting.aspx

Dman

Bronze
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:28 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Dman » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:12 am

boblawlob wrote:
Dman wrote:
KingFish wrote:
yodamiked wrote:What are people's thoughts on UCLA not ranking its students? In one way, if you're hanging around median it helps you out, but if you manage to kick butt and make it into the top 10%, my concern is that you're not going to get the same opportunities you would at a school that ranks its students. Seems like it lowers your risks, but puts everyone (even those who may not deserve it) at more equal footing. Thoughts?
If you get good enough grades to be top 10%, the employers will be able to tell just from looking at your transcript and seeing all the A's. Maybe a current Bruin can answer, but I doubt it hurts students at all. Most top schools don't rank right?

Bruin alum here. Not ranking has no effect on hiring by firms in California. Firms are pretty clear what GPAs approximate requisite rank cutoffs. There might be some confusion if you were applying outside of Cali markets but as other said if you were in top 10% range employers will know. And if you are medium, a UCLA degree is not going to help you much against local schools regardless of rank.
So even top 50% at UCLA won't be remotely any good?
Outside of Socal, no.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


LittleTree

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by LittleTree » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:16 am

Dman wrote:
LittleTree wrote:The dean told me they rank the top 10 students numerically and give rankings every 5% up to the top 25%
The top 10 students ranked part has always been the case. I did not mention it because it is best to not fantasize about such things. Of course you can get your rank if you apply for clerkships but you are required to sign a non-disclosure so, that rank cannot be given to employers outside of that context. The 5% up to 25% thing, I have never heard of, it is also not listed on the schools website in ranking https://www.law.ucla.edu/career-service ... rting.aspx
The conversation was in the context of clerking so thats probably what they were talking about. My bad. Thanks for the clarification.

Hrun

New
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:51 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Hrun » Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:16 pm

Any acceptances today? I'm starting to loose hope.

User avatar
yodamiked

Bronze
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by yodamiked » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:31 pm

Anyone know what most UCLA law students do for work during their first summer? I know other schools I'm considering have summer externships that count for credit, but it doesn't look like UCLA offers anything during the summer. From what I can glean from the internet, doesn't look like many students get firm employment their first summer either.

User avatar
SisyphusHappy

Bronze
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:46 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by SisyphusHappy » Sat Apr 20, 2013 3:30 pm

yodamiked wrote:Anyone know what most UCLA law students do for work during their first summer? I know other schools I'm considering have summer externships that count for credit, but it doesn't look like UCLA offers anything during the summer. From what I can glean from the internet, doesn't look like many students get firm employment their first summer either.
Mostly PI/government/judicial work. They have funding for the first two. The library also hires RAs. It's not the most exciting thing in the world, but it pays and the hours are great.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


fallingup

Bronze
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by fallingup » Mon Apr 22, 2013 2:02 pm

Just withdrew. $75K back in the pot. Good luck to all.

User avatar
uconjak

Bronze
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by uconjak » Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:47 pm

Going to send in the Deposit, next week. They up'ed my Scholly to 90K 30 days ago. Does anyone think that I could go back to the well for another 15K? to even up the COA to USC? I think it is bad form but that is 15K less to borrow.

User avatar
AKsnow

Bronze
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by AKsnow » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:11 pm

uconjak wrote:Going to send in the Deposit, next week. They up'ed my Scholly to 90K 30 days ago. Does anyone think that I could go back to the well for another 15K? to even up the COA to USC? I think it is bad form but that is 15K less to borrow.
Yes. You have better numbers than me and I just got upped to 105k. That was my second request to them.

User avatar
md22

Bronze
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by md22 » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:45 pm

Still no word from UCLA. What is going on?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Melo723

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:38 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Melo723 » Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:49 pm

md22 wrote:Still no word from UCLA. What is going on?
Yeah, I'm getting super anxious. Would it be a bad idea for me to call the admissions office for an update? I don't want to annoy them..

kckool7

Bronze
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 3:32 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by kckool7 » Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:03 pm

Waitlisted from UCLA, applied in late January. Still thinking about if I'll ride it out.

User avatar
violettre

New
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:44 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by violettre » Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:47 pm

Boo. Rejected via email.

User avatar
md22

Bronze
Posts: 345
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by md22 » Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:54 pm

Finally heard from UCLA. Waitlisted. I think I'll ride it out. What's the consensus on our chances of getting in off of the waitlist?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
luxurylawyer

Bronze
Posts: 213
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by luxurylawyer » Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:32 am

Waitlisted as well. That's seven thus far, Shooter.

AndiDail

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:30 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by AndiDail » Thu Apr 25, 2013 3:15 pm

Also waitlisted via e-mail. I'm already in L.A., so I plan to ride it out!

bruin91

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bruin91 » Thu Apr 25, 2013 9:37 pm

Looks like I'm going to be a Bruin for life!!
Last edited by bruin91 on Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cali_App_333

New
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:32 am

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Cali_App_333 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 1:46 am

Just committed to UCLA Law School. Bruin for life!!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


JohnMarshall17

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JohnMarshall17 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:07 am

Committed 2 days ago. Go Bruins!!!

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jbagelboy » Fri Apr 26, 2013 5:57 pm

Withdrew from UCLA via SIR website.

I hope it lets one of you recent waitlists get admitted.

UCLA was my first law school acceptance ever. It felt very bizarre withdrawing. I remember getting Dean Schwartz's call like it was yesterday and thinking, wow, I'm actually going to law school.

TBH, if it weren't for TLS and all the debt/employment hype here, I may have even attended because I'm from SoCal and UCLA was my original goal when I was studying for the LSAT. Hopefully I won't regret this!

User avatar
thatgumyoulike

New
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:36 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by thatgumyoulike » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:19 pm

So for the May 1st seat deposit deadline, it seems we have to sign a SIR. Does anyone know if it is binding? I still have some negotiating to do. Also, is it too late to ask for an extension?

bruin91

Bronze
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm

Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bruin91 » Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:28 pm

thatgumyoulike wrote:So for the May 1st seat deposit deadline, it seems we have to sign a SIR. Does anyone know if it is binding? I still have some negotiating to do. Also, is it too late to ask for an extension?
No, not binding. As for the extension, I think it would depend on the reason(s) you cite.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”