Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
sitwaitwish
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:31 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby sitwaitwish » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:32 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:Is anyone else waiting for the exeter guy from the harvard thread to come over here and tell us all he got in at stanford, too?


LOL

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:32 pm

helix23 wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:Is anyone else waiting for the exeter guy from the harvard thread to come over here and tell us all he got in at stanford, too?


you're just jealous



--ImageRemoved--

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WalkingPlato » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:37 pm

What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:38 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:

User avatar
tyler.durden
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby tyler.durden » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:40 pm

helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:


+1 on all of that

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WalkingPlato » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:44 pm

helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:


I'm a reverse splitter (high GPA, a bit over 75%) but low LSAT (one under 25%..) It's like having a good body but ugly face? Or is it good face but bad body?

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:45 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:
helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:


I'm a reverse splitter (high GPA, a bit over 75%) but low LSAT (one under 25%..) It's like having a good body but ugly face? Or is it good face but bad body?


Good face bad body. definitely.

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:46 pm

helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:
helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:


I'm a reverse splitter (high GPA, a bit over 75%) but low LSAT (one under 25%..) It's like having a good body but ugly face? Or is it good face but bad body?


Good face bad body. definitely.



reverse butterface

User avatar
spicyyoda17
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby spicyyoda17 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:46 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:
helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:


I'm a reverse splitter (high GPA, a bit over 75%) but low LSAT (one under 25%..) It's like having a good body but ugly face? Or is it good face but bad body?


Good personality + ugly body/face

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WalkingPlato » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:48 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:
helix23 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:What's your guys' latest status date? Mine is still in late November. They haven't touched me since late November. Am I that ugly?


Sitting on 9/18 over here. Again, this has been covered elsewhere, but looks cannot be a factor. unless I'm too good looking? :shock:


I'm a reverse splitter (high GPA, a bit over 75%) but low LSAT (one under 25%..) It's like having a good body but ugly face? Or is it good face but bad body?


Good personality + ugly body/face


They say that they look for very interesting people with good backgrounds... so maybe the personality gets me in and I can wear a full body burka or something.. maybe one of those new stylish ones they're making in Turkey..

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Anonymous4444 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:58 pm

They say that they look for very interesting people with good backgrounds... so maybe the personality gets me in and I can wear a full body burka or something.. maybe one of those new stylish ones they're making in Turkey..[/quote]


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlv7Bp-L2MM

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WalkingPlato » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:03 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:They say that they look for very interesting people with good backgrounds... so maybe the personality gets me in and I can wear a full body burka or something.. maybe one of those new stylish ones they're making in Turkey..



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlv7Bp-L2MM[/quote]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVAGfXtHii0

hahaha He said, "you're like a child!" haha

User avatar
spicyyoda17
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby spicyyoda17 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:05 pm

LSAT = body
GPA = personality
C&F = baggage (past relationships)
Personal Statement = first date
Resume = job/major

Only one I can't figure out: softs. You gotta have a few, and yet, they rarely make a difference.

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Anonymous4444 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:07 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:LSAT = body
GPA = personality
C&F = baggage (past relationships)
Personal Statement = first date
Resume = job/major

Only one I can't figure out: softs. You gotta have a few, and yet, they rarely make a difference.


softs= comfortable ($$$)
Last edited by Anonymous4444 on Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
WhiteyCakes
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WhiteyCakes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:07 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:LSAT = body
GPA = personality
C&F = baggage (past relationships)
Personal Statement = first date
Resume = job/major

Only one I can't figure out: softs. You gotta have a few, and yet, they rarely make a difference.


Kids

curious66
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby curious66 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:09 pm

sitwaitwish wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:Is anyone else waiting for the exeter guy from the harvard thread to come over here and tell us all he got in at stanford, too?


LOL


But that would be great news.. since that person can't go to both :)

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Anonymous4444 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:10 pm

curious66 wrote:
sitwaitwish wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:Is anyone else waiting for the exeter guy from the harvard thread to come over here and tell us all he got in at stanford, too?


LOL


But that would be great news.. since that person can't go to both :)


hes a 15th generation harvard on his dad's side and 15 generations of stanford on his moms

User avatar
Spritzpiggy
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Spritzpiggy » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:18 pm

Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:23 pm

Spritzpiggy wrote:Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.



Hey, look on the upside, he's easy to recognize 'cause he's a card-carrying member of that dbag club

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WalkingPlato » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:30 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
Spritzpiggy wrote:Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.



Hey, look on the upside, he's easy to recognize 'cause he's a card-carrying member of that dbag club


Maybe he's smart and got in based on merit... I try not to judge people before getting to know them.

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:31 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Spritzpiggy wrote:Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.



Hey, look on the upside, he's easy to recognize 'cause he's a card-carrying member of that dbag club


Maybe he's smart and got in based on merit... I try not to judge people before getting to know them.



got into an elite $$$$$ private high school based on merit?


lol k

User avatar
Teflon_Don
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Teflon_Don » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:33 pm

Some entertainment while we wait... http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AtyKofFih8Y

User avatar
RSterling
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby RSterling » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:34 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Spritzpiggy wrote:Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.



Hey, look on the upside, he's easy to recognize 'cause he's a card-carrying member of that dbag club


Maybe he's smart and got in based on merit... I try not to judge people before getting to know them.



got into an elite $$$$$ private high school based on merit?


lol k


If he was that smart, he wouldn't be talking about his family money and legacy. He'd be talking about his 180/4.0. I'm not even convinced that he's not a troll.

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WalkingPlato » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:35 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Spritzpiggy wrote:Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.



Hey, look on the upside, he's easy to recognize 'cause he's a card-carrying member of that dbag club


Maybe he's smart and got in based on merit... I try not to judge people before getting to know them.



got into an elite $$$$$ private high school based on merit?


lol k


Well no.. I meant him getting into Harvard and maybe Stanford.. If he went to a private elite high school, it would seem that he got a good enough education to maybe eventually get into top law schools based on smarts and merit.

BigZuck
Posts: 10859
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby BigZuck » Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:35 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Spritzpiggy wrote:Whatever school accepts him will automatically lose some of its appeal to me.

Apparently even with that prestigious pedigree none of those schools succeeded in teaching him basic humility.



Hey, look on the upside, he's easy to recognize 'cause he's a card-carrying member of that dbag club


Maybe he's smart and got in based on merit... I try not to judge people before getting to know them.



got into an elite $$$$$ private high school based on merit?


lol k


Weren't you complaining in another thread about your dad making too much money and it adversely affecting you?



Considering the bumps today with no movement I wonder what it will be like in this thread when they actually make decisions.

Also no one is complaining about the status checker anymore???




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: apricots, christinaxcarrie, hellohalo, JordanLaw15, kthrynf, samsamthomas, sjs12 and 13 guests