Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
carboncopyx
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby carboncopyx » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:00 pm

smdpnp wrote:
A decision letter has been sent.

Does it have to be in red? Oh well, gonna wait until it arrives to see if it's a ding or WL.

I just checked mine and almost flipped out when I didn't see the "Your application is complete" in red in the middle at the top. And then I realized that it had been changed to left alignment. And still said the same thing as before. It's always been red, if that makes you feel any better.

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9635
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby jbagelboy » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:02 pm

carboncopyx wrote:
smdpnp wrote:
A decision letter has been sent.

Does it have to be in red? Oh well, gonna wait until it arrives to see if it's a ding or WL.

I just checked mine and almost flipped out when I didn't see the "Your application is complete" in red in the middle at the top. And then I realized that it had been changed to left alignment. And still said the same thing as before. It's always been red, if that makes you feel any better.


changed to left alignment as well.

User avatar
dnptan
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby dnptan » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:03 pm

carboncopyx wrote:
smdpnp wrote:
A decision letter has been sent.

Does it have to be in red? Oh well, gonna wait until it arrives to see if it's a ding or WL.

I just checked mine and almost flipped out when I didn't see the "Your application is complete" in red in the middle at the top. And then I realized that it had been changed to left alignment. And still said the same thing as before. It's always been red, if that makes you feel any better.


Is SLS your top choice Carbon?

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Anonymous4444 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:08 pm

Alignment speculation begin!

User avatar
cwid1391
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby cwid1391 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:09 pm

I never noticed the alignment but mine is now left.

Does anyone still have a center alignment? Post your stats, age, SSN, and where you can be found at various times of the day. Let's see if we can find a correlation.

User avatar
smdpnp
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby smdpnp » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:12 pm

I caved, I called, I'm out.

Looks like I'll be staying in NY. G'luck to everyone still waiting (which is pretty much almost everyone here.) Stats in profile.

User avatar
cwid1391
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby cwid1391 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:14 pm

smdpnp wrote:I caved, I called, I'm out.

Looks like I'll be staying in NY. G'luck to everyone still waiting (which is pretty much almost everyone here.) Stats in profile.


BOOOO. Sorry to hear that. :cry:

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:14 pm

Everyone else who called was WLed, no?

User avatar
cwid1391
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby cwid1391 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:16 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:Everyone else who called was WLed, no?


There's at least one rejection reported today on LSN. It looks like today was a mixed bag. Harder to tell what it means to make it through.

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9635
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby jbagelboy » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:17 pm

smdpnp wrote:I caved, I called, I'm out.

Looks like I'll be staying in NY. G'luck to everyone still waiting (which is pretty much almost everyone here.) Stats in profile.


Condolences.

To make this simple, literally nothing can be drawn from any of this.

Out of curiosity, for those who went DLS -> WL, was it a letter size or envelope size in the mail? I'm assuming rejection is just letter size.

onix
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:42 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby onix » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:18 pm

Mine has been left aligned since the beginning, don't think it means anything.

User avatar
txdude45
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby txdude45 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:31 pm

onix wrote:Mine has been left aligned since the beginning, don't think it means anything.


Same

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:38 pm

txdude45 wrote:
onix wrote:Mine has been left aligned since the beginning, don't think it means anything.


Same

zabava
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:30 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby zabava » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:39 pm

jbagelboy wrote:Out of curiosity, for those who went DLS -> WL, was it a letter size or envelope size in the mail? I'm assuming rejection is just letter size.


As soon as there is a letter in your mailbox, can't you open it and find out?

User avatar
txdude45
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby txdude45 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:41 pm

zabava wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:Out of curiosity, for those who went DLS -> WL, was it a letter size or envelope size in the mail? I'm assuming rejection is just letter size.


As soon as there is a letter in your mailbox, can't you open it and find out?


Now that its been established that you can call and ask your status, why is the letter size relevant? Even if you couldn't call, you've saved yourself maybe 10 seconds with this knowledge.

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby sinfiery » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:43 pm

Complicated algorithm involving letter size and shipment speed obviously

andreskicdo
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 12:06 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby andreskicdo » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:50 pm

I am still sitting, waiting, wishing....

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9635
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby jbagelboy » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:51 pm

txdude45 wrote:
zabava wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:Out of curiosity, for those who went DLS -> WL, was it a letter size or envelope size in the mail? I'm assuming rejection is just letter size.


As soon as there is a letter in your mailbox, can't you open it and find out?


Now that its been established that you can call and ask your status, why is the letter size relevant? Even if you couldn't call, you've saved yourself maybe 10 seconds with this knowledge.


everyone's so tense! chill! i haven't gone DLS yet. I'm just curious but of course, like 98% of the details we discuss, it won't matter in the end.

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9635
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby jbagelboy » Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:51 pm

sinfiery wrote:Complicated algorithm involving letter size and shipment speed obviously


Drew the formulas on my wrist for when the moment comes.

TrustInMusic
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby TrustInMusic » Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:33 pm

I noticed the left alignment as well. We need help. Seriously.

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby sinfiery » Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:02 pm

jbagelboy wrote:Drew the formulas on my wrist for when the moment comes.

Outed as Princeton alum

User avatar
chickpea
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby chickpea » Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:25 pm

still no DLS. i think my info was always left aligned as well. guess we can hope for more decisions tomorrow?

User avatar
ssanonymous
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby ssanonymous » Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:37 pm

You guys... this alignment stuff is crazy. Now, lowercase emails? Dats what I'm talking about!

switchis32
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:35 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby switchis32 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:16 pm

Hey I know this is a stupid or trivial question, but being that it says decision letter sent, what do you actually say if you call to get your decision over the phone? (not that I have reached Dsl yet but I was just wondering) I feel like they would just say you will see in your letter. Haha

User avatar
wert3813
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby wert3813 » Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:20 pm

switchis32 wrote:Hey I know this is a stupid or trivial question, but being that it says decision letter sent, what do you actually say if you call to get your decision over the phone? (not that I have reached Dsl yet but I was just wondering) I feel like they would just say you will see in your letter. Haha


Due to deposit deadlines I really need to know my decision. Remember to someone not on TLS there is no reason to know that DLS does not equal admit.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Automotomayor, Google [Bot], JazzyMac and 6 guests