Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
WhiteyCakes
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby WhiteyCakes » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:11 pm

ITT: A bunch of nonsense.

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:20 pm

WhiteyCakes wrote:ITT: A bunch of nonsense.



It's gonna be a bunch of BS until April probably, knowing Stanford.

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:25 pm

digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?

User avatar
spicyyoda17
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby spicyyoda17 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:28 pm

helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


No but I feel like it's only a matter of time before law schools turn to the ever-easy and non-confrontational rejection method that is the text message.

"Hey [spicyyoda17], this is Stanford Law. You did not get in. Sorry :) Hope you have a great day!"

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:30 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


No but I feel like it's only a matter of time before law schools turn to the ever-easy and non-confrontational rejection method that is the text message.

"Hey [spicyyoda17], this is Stanford Law. You did not get in. Sorry :) Hope you have a great day!"


I feel it'd be more "lol NOPE, luv Stanford"

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:30 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


No but I feel like it's only a matter of time before law schools turn to the ever-easy and non-confrontational rejection method that is the text message.

"Hey [spicyyoda17], this is Stanford Law. You did not get in. Sorry :) Hope you have a great day!"


"hey helix ive thought abt it alot and i just wanna stay friends."

User avatar
digifly
Posts: 652
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby digifly » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:45 pm

helix23 wrote:
spicyyoda17 wrote:
helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


No but I feel like it's only a matter of time before law schools turn to the ever-easy and non-confrontational rejection method that is the text message.

"Hey [spicyyoda17], this is Stanford Law. You did not get in. Sorry :) Hope you have a great day!"


"hey helix ive thought abt it alot and i just wanna stay friends."


"UR IN!!"
"Damn autocorrect."
"*UR OUT!"

User avatar
spicyyoda17
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby spicyyoda17 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:47 pm

digifly wrote:
"UR IN!!"
"Damn autocorrect."
"*UR OUT!"


Love this.

one_by_one
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby one_by_one » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:49 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
digifly wrote:
"UR IN!!"
"Damn autocorrect."
"*UR OUT!"


Love this.


This just makes me think of: http://www.damnyouautocorrect.com/5759/shocking-news/

User avatar
honeybadger12
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby honeybadger12 » Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:13 pm

digifly wrote:"UR IN!!"
"Damn autocorrect."
"*UR OUT!"

hahaha well done

tiger11
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:19 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby tiger11 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:23 am

digifly wrote:"UR IN!!"
"Damn autocorrect."
"*UR OUT!"



cudos to your creativity, SLS can't possibly say no.

User avatar
digifly
Posts: 652
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby digifly » Wed Dec 05, 2012 5:30 am

tiger11 wrote:
digifly wrote:"UR IN!!"
"Damn autocorrect."
"*UR OUT!"



cudos to your creativity, SLS can't possibly say no.


Thanks! If only this were true. Maybe I'll email the admissions office and let them know which file that comment can be labeled under :) haha

User avatar
djwjddl
Posts: 476
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby djwjddl » Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:31 am

helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


According to last cycles thread it seems like "DLS" via status checker is not so good news. Means either a WL or deny is on its way via snail mail. People, however, were able to call the admissions office when they received DLS to find out their fate before the letter arrived.

tiger11
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:19 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby tiger11 » Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:40 am

djwjddl wrote:
helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


According to last cycles thread it seems like "DLS" via status checker is not so good news. Means either a WL or deny is on its way via snail mail. People, however, were able to call the admissions office when they received DLS to find out their fate before the letter arrived.


This is correct...kind of. Everyone has a DLS status eventually. The only difference is, accepted people received phone calls before the DLS status showed up on the status checker. At least my personal experience. :D

User avatar
postard
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby postard » Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:34 pm

Finally complete and submitted for review. Submitted 11/21, delayed because of Dean's Statement.

User avatar
Cicero76
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Cicero76 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:25 pm

tiger11 wrote:
djwjddl wrote:
helix23 wrote:
digifly wrote:
Mine has said "Your file has been submitted for review" for almost 6 weeks now.."

"That's the last step before a decision."


Well there it is. Anyone know in what format dings come?


According to last cycles thread it seems like "DLS" via status checker is not so good news. Means either a WL or deny is on its way via snail mail. People, however, were able to call the admissions office when they received DLS to find out their fate before the letter arrived.


This is correct...kind of. Everyone has a DLS status eventually. The only difference is, accepted people received phone calls before the DLS status showed up on the status checker. At least my personal experience. :D


DLS status?

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:34 pm

Decision Letter Sent

haveahat
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:17 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby haveahat » Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:49 pm

helix23 wrote:Decision Letter Sent



Had a mini heart-attack when I saw this, then realized you were clarifying for the poster above. That was fun.

User avatar
uconjak
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby uconjak » Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:55 pm

When does sls start sending acceptances?

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:57 pm

uconjak wrote:When does sls start sending acceptances?


based on last year's graph *SLS* could start putting out next week and/or 1st week of Jan

Image
Last edited by helix23 on Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby helix23 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:59 pm

haveahat wrote:
helix23 wrote:Decision Letter Sent



Had a mini heart-attack when I saw this, then realized you were clarifying for the poster above. That was fun.


lol my b.

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Anonymous4444 » Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:08 pm

helix23 wrote:
haveahat wrote:
helix23 wrote:Decision Letter Sent



Had a mini heart-attack when I saw this, then realized you were clarifying for the poster above. That was fun.


lol my b.


same here

one_by_one
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby one_by_one » Sat Dec 08, 2012 7:15 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:
helix23 wrote:
haveahat wrote:
helix23 wrote:Decision Letter Sent



Had a mini heart-attack when I saw this, then realized you were clarifying for the poster above. That was fun.


lol my b.


same here


+1 It caused me to look at my status checker for the first time in weeks haha

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby Anonymous4444 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 3:27 am

Stanford has me at September still. Anyone else feel They are trying too hard to be like Yale...

Lame

It's too bad bec there's nothing we can do if Yale accepts me on sept 1im still going.

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Stanford C/O 2016 Applicants Thread

Postby twinkletoes16 » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:45 am

I'd rather go to Stanford than Yale. Didn't even apply to Yale.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Automotomayor, Bing [Bot], JazzyMac, nightie and 6 guests