University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
jackbauer10
Posts: 168
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:12 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby jackbauer10 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:33 pm


User avatar
philosoraptor
Posts: 708
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:49 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby philosoraptor » Fri Mar 08, 2013 4:37 pm

hobie2515 wrote:
philosoraptor wrote:Unless your circumstances are truly out of the ordinary, don't expect to get any significant need-based grants; this is not like college financial aid. Law schools expect you to borrow everything you need and, fairly or unfairly, to pay it back on your big ol' lawyer's salary after three years.


So you're saying that when the UT web site states that 66% of the incoming 2011-2012 received need based grants and loans, they are skewing these statistics?
Pretty much, yeah. I'm sure I'm counted in the 66% and I get less than $1,000 in "need-based" aid a semester. Nice gesture, but for a few years I'm going to be paying several times that in interest alone, every year. I'd be willing to bet I get the standard grant amount for the non-rich.

Otherwise, yeah, the word "loans" makes UT's statement misleading as to the availability of need-based aid.

BigZuck
Posts: 10854
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby BigZuck » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:19 pm

philosoraptor wrote:
hobie2515 wrote:
philosoraptor wrote:Unless your circumstances are truly out of the ordinary, don't expect to get any significant need-based grants; this is not like college financial aid. Law schools expect you to borrow everything you need and, fairly or unfairly, to pay it back on your big ol' lawyer's salary after three years.


So you're saying that when the UT web site states that 66% of the incoming 2011-2012 received need based grants and loans, they are skewing these statistics?
Pretty much, yeah. I'm sure I'm counted in the 66% and I get less than $1,000 in "need-based" aid a semester. Nice gesture, but for a few years I'm going to be paying several times that in interest alone, every year. I'd be willing to bet I get the standard grant amount for the non-rich.

Otherwise, yeah, the word "loans" makes UT's statement misleading as to the availability of need-based aid.


I'm shocked that 33% of the class pays out of pocket. Who the hell pays cash for law school? The kids of fancy pants attorneys?

User avatar
Richie Tenenbaum
Posts: 2162
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby Richie Tenenbaum » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:37 pm

BigZuck wrote:
philosoraptor wrote:
hobie2515 wrote:
philosoraptor wrote:Unless your circumstances are truly out of the ordinary, don't expect to get any significant need-based grants; this is not like college financial aid. Law schools expect you to borrow everything you need and, fairly or unfairly, to pay it back on your big ol' lawyer's salary after three years.


So you're saying that when the UT web site states that 66% of the incoming 2011-2012 received need based grants and loans, they are skewing these statistics?
Pretty much, yeah. I'm sure I'm counted in the 66% and I get less than $1,000 in "need-based" aid a semester. Nice gesture, but for a few years I'm going to be paying several times that in interest alone, every year. I'd be willing to bet I get the standard grant amount for the non-rich.

Otherwise, yeah, the word "loans" makes UT's statement misleading as to the availability of need-based aid.


I'm shocked that 33% of the class pays out of pocket. Who the hell pays cash for law school? The kids of fancy pants attorneys?


Welcome to student loans. See also viewtopic.php?f=10&t=183509

User avatar
hobie2515
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby hobie2515 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:40 pm

hobie2515 wrote:So you're saying that when the UT web site states that 66% of the incoming 2011-2012 received need based grants and loans, they are skewing these statistics?


jackbauer10 wrote:Otherwise, yeah, the word "loans" makes UT's statement misleading as to the availability of need-based aid.


This is what I was getting at. I understand lumping the two terms together under one statistic doesn't paint the whole picture, I guess I just wanted someone else to make the claim (or refute it on some level).

And I completely agree about the 33%, that's stunning to me as well. If I was a parent with those means I think I might wait until my kid has actually graduated before I put up $150,000 cash money.

helpplease
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby helpplease » Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:56 pm

shifty_eyed wrote:
jvincent11 wrote:
helpplease wrote:This wait is pure torture. UT has always been my #1 choice, submitted 12/01 and have heard nothing. I retook LSAT in Dec and raised my score from a 160 to 165, but with a 3.5x I know I still don't have a good shot. I was hoping my Texas residency would give me some sort of bump though. I also followed up with a Why UT essay early February, and I have no idea if that did any good. Even if it's a rejection, I JUST WANT TO KNOW. :(

Good news is that I miraculously got a full scholarship at UH and I learned this week that I was held at Northwestern, which is awesome. If i'm in a situation deciding between UH and NU i'll have no idea what to do. A UT acceptance would make things so much easier. Do yall think they'll give decisions to the majority of applicants in March or is it possible that i'll hear in April?

ALSO, it kills me to see people on LSN get waitlisted (or even accepted, although these are much fewer obviously) with scores at or below my numbers. Sighh, I need to just suck it up. :?


Why is full scholarship at UH a miracle? Their 75th percentile LSAT score is 163, and that school just isn't very good. IMHO, you will not get into Northwestern, and you only have a slight chance at UT. You can get into good schools with your stats. Probably not T20, but 20-35 definitely, and maybe some money if you applied early next cycle, especially if you retake in June and go up a point or 2

UH does relatively well for its ranking. A full ride from there is nothing to sneeze at. I know someone who turned down UT for a full ride at UH (plus free COL from spouse). I think if you are debt averse, it's not an awful choice. FWIW, I have a 172, and only got 15k/yr from UH!

Helpplease, I think you have a decent chance at UT, especially if they end up low on Texas residents. NU is more of a longshot, but you never know.

I would gear up for a retake in June if possible because 2 points would guarantee that UT would take you and 3 would get you money.


Thank you for the encouragement, unlike that previous post :roll: Retaking in June isn't in the cards for me due to work and other factors, so I guess i'll just hope for the best. If i'm not so lucky, like you mentioned, UH is an attractive option. The only reservation I have about UH is the uncertainty of what would happen if I don't end up in the top quarter. If i'm paying absolutely nothing for law school (low COL cause I live with parents in Houston) I wouldn't be damned if I didn't get biglaw, but can UH students land a decent job otherwise? Does anybody know where I can research this sort of information?

User avatar
hobie2515
Posts: 98
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby hobie2515 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:11 pm

http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school= ... &show=sals

According to LST, 43.8% students are making more than $58,000. If you're graduating essentially debt free this doesn't appear to be too bad, all things considered.

They also place more than half of their students in full-time, J.D Required jobs. Obviously not a guarantee but certainly in line with most other schools of their rank.

BigZuck
Posts: 10854
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby BigZuck » Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:50 pm

Not retaking June would be an objectively bad decision, especially when there is zero downside and nothing but upside. Take it from me, Shifty, Car, and all the others who kept on taking the stupid thing over and over. Not to mention unless you have a really good job you could probably quit it, focus solely on the LSAT and make more money than you would have at your job.

Last cycle I was looking at sticker at U of H. This cycle I can go to UT for 45K cheaper than U of H would have been. If I take my T20 full ride option I will have made 140K on my retake. Exact same application, the only thing that's different is the LSAT.

Retake!

helpplease
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby helpplease » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:08 pm

BigZuck wrote:Not retaking June would be an objectively bad decision, especially when there is zero downside and nothing but upside. Take it from me, Shifty, Car, and all the others who kept on taking the stupid thing over and over. Not to mention unless you have a really good job you could probably quit it, focus solely on the LSAT and make more money than you would have at your job.

Last cycle I was looking at sticker at U of H. This cycle I can go to UT for 45K cheaper than U of H would have been. If I take my T20 full ride option I will have made 140K on my retake. Exact same application, the only thing that's different is the LSAT.

Retake!


Lol i'm not going to wait for another full cycle. Hats off to you for being able to do that, but I won't. Also I'm in a bit of a different situation than what you were in. Paying full tuition at UH would definitely encourage me to retake. Having a full tuition scholarship on the other hand doesn't exactly motivate me as much to study for that damn test again.

Seriously, it's extremely admirable that some of you all have the will to retake 3 or 4 times, but that is just not an option for me. I will just have to wait and see I guess.

BigZuck
Posts: 10854
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby BigZuck » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:11 pm

helpplease wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Not retaking June would be an objectively bad decision, especially when there is zero downside and nothing but upside. Take it from me, Shifty, Car, and all the others who kept on taking the stupid thing over and over. Not to mention unless you have a really good job you could probably quit it, focus solely on the LSAT and make more money than you would have at your job.

Last cycle I was looking at sticker at U of H. This cycle I can go to UT for 45K cheaper than U of H would have been. If I take my T20 full ride option I will have made 140K on my retake. Exact same application, the only thing that's different is the LSAT.

Retake!


Lol i'm not going to wait for another full cycle. Hats off to you for being able to do that, but I won't. Also I'm in a bit of a different situation than what you were in. Paying full tuition at UH would definitely encourage me to retake. Having a full tuition scholarship on the other hand doesn't exactly motivate me as much to study for that damn test again.

Seriously, it's extremely admirable that some of you all have the will to retake 3 or 4 times, but that is just not an option for me. I will just have to wait and see I guess.


Where did I say anything about you waiting another cycle? I said retake June.

Yeah, if you retake and don't score high enough then take the offer at UH if you want. Not retaking (especially when you already have a pretty good fallback option) would be an unbelievably short-sighted decision.

User avatar
timeandspace11
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby timeandspace11 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:14 pm

helpplease wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Not retaking June would be an objectively bad decision, especially when there is zero downside and nothing but upside. Take it from me, Shifty, Car, and all the others who kept on taking the stupid thing over and over. Not to mention unless you have a really good job you could probably quit it, focus solely on the LSAT and make more money than you would have at your job.

Last cycle I was looking at sticker at U of H. This cycle I can go to UT for 45K cheaper than U of H would have been. If I take my T20 full ride option I will have made 140K on my retake. Exact same application, the only thing that's different is the LSAT.

Retake!


Lol i'm not going to wait for another full cycle. Hats off to you for being able to do that, but I won't. Also I'm in a bit of a different situation than what you were in. Paying full tuition at UH would definitely encourage me to retake. Having a full tuition scholarship on the other hand doesn't exactly motivate me as much to study for that damn test again.

Seriously, it's extremely admirable that some of you all have the will to retake 3 or 4 times, but that is just not an option for me. I will just have to wait and see I guess.


I agree with Big Zuck. My last LSAT score was not enough to get into UT. Probably the highest ranked school I could get into would be UF. Now I got a scholarship to attend UT. Is all the extra money over 3 years not worth studying for three more months for the test?

helpplease
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby helpplease » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:28 pm

timeandspace11 wrote:
helpplease wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Not retaking June would be an objectively bad decision, especially when there is zero downside and nothing but upside. Take it from me, Shifty, Car, and all the others who kept on taking the stupid thing over and over. Not to mention unless you have a really good job you could probably quit it, focus solely on the LSAT and make more money than you would have at your job.

Last cycle I was looking at sticker at U of H. This cycle I can go to UT for 45K cheaper than U of H would have been. If I take my T20 full ride option I will have made 140K on my retake. Exact same application, the only thing that's different is the LSAT.

Retake!


Lol i'm not going to wait for another full cycle. Hats off to you for being able to do that, but I won't. Also I'm in a bit of a different situation than what you were in. Paying full tuition at UH would definitely encourage me to retake. Having a full tuition scholarship on the other hand doesn't exactly motivate me as much to study for that damn test again.

Seriously, it's extremely admirable that some of you all have the will to retake 3 or 4 times, but that is just not an option for me. I will just have to wait and see I guess.


I agree with Big Zuck. My last LSAT score was not enough to get into UT. Probably the highest ranked school I could get into would be UF. Now I got a scholarship to attend UT. Is all the extra money over 3 years not worth studying for three more months for the test?
BigZuck wrote:
helpplease wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Not retaking June would be an objectively bad decision, especially when there is zero downside and nothing but upside. Take it from me, Shifty, Car, and all the others who kept on taking the stupid thing over and over. Not to mention unless you have a really good job you could probably quit it, focus solely on the LSAT and make more money than you would have at your job.

Last cycle I was looking at sticker at U of H. This cycle I can go to UT for 45K cheaper than U of H would have been. If I take my T20 full ride option I will have made 140K on my retake. Exact same application, the only thing that's different is the LSAT.

Retake!


Lol i'm not going to wait for another full cycle. Hats off to you for being able to do that, but I won't. Also I'm in a bit of a different situation than what you were in. Paying full tuition at UH would definitely encourage me to retake. Having a full tuition scholarship on the other hand doesn't exactly motivate me as much to study for that damn test again.

Seriously, it's extremely admirable that some of you all have the will to retake 3 or 4 times, but that is just not an option for me. I will just have to wait and see I guess.


Where did I say anything about you waiting another cycle? I said retake June.

Yeah, if you retake and don't score high enough then take the offer at UH if you want. Not retaking (especially when you already have a pretty good fallback option) would be an unbelievably short-sighted decision.


The issue other than investing the time is that I really don't think I can improve much. I went from a 160 to a 165 and my highest practice LSAT was a 166. I also went through every prep test already and I've been studying for the test since last summer. I appreciate yalls advice in any case.

User avatar
JXander
Posts: 960
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby JXander » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:43 pm

I am a tad skeptical about taking the LSAT again for the purpose of getting off the WL and into my dream school... I have a few reasons, and I do appreciate any advice.

1. I suck at standardized tests. I do fine on the PTs (I rarely went below a 165+ until June of last year), but I end up bombing the real thing. I get super nervous and I end up having trouble focusing. Whether the cause of this can be remedied to produce a better score, I am simply worried about doing worse, and ultimately wasting my money, time, and shot at UT.
2. I know many law students and young attorneys. They have told me that admissions typically doesn't take those new scores into account.
2.a. I know they aren't actual admissions staff, and I would prefer to get an answer from them before I make my decision to retake. I have heard it is extremely bad etiquette to ask admissions if taking the test and getting a higher score would be an option.

Thanks for your help... I guess I really just need some solid convincing that studying for the blasted thing again while working full-time is my only option.

User avatar
Richie Tenenbaum
Posts: 2162
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby Richie Tenenbaum » Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:55 pm

JXander wrote:I am a tad skeptical about taking the LSAT again for the purpose of getting off the WL and into my dream school... I have a few reasons, and I do appreciate any advice.

1. I suck at standardized tests. I do fine on the PTs (I rarely went below a 165+ until June of last year), but I end up bombing the real thing. I get super nervous and I end up having trouble focusing. Whether the cause of this can be remedied to produce a better score, I am simply worried about doing worse, and ultimately wasting my money, time, and shot at UT.
2. I know many law students and young attorneys. They have told me that admissions typically doesn't take those new scores into account.
2.a. I know they aren't actual admissions staff, and I would prefer to get an answer from them before I make my decision to retake. I have heard it is extremely bad etiquette to ask admissions if taking the test and getting a higher score would be an option.

Thanks for your help... I guess I really just need some solid convincing that studying for the blasted thing again while working full-time is my only option.


When I was deciding to retake, I emailed UT and they told me that they have a policy of not considering June scores for people on the WL. I still took the June test and scored 8 points higher. I then emailed Vanderbilt and UT the new score and was accepted around 1-2 days later off the WL of both (and both with substantial scholarship offers).

A higher score matters, especially if that puts you over their median or 75th LSAT number. Everyone else can pretend it doesn't, but my experience was that it very much matters, no matter what people tell you.

(Please don't quote this. I think my experience is better to share with all people in this thread (as opposed to just PMing people), but it has outing information that I will probably go back and delete at some point.)

User avatar
shifty_eyed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby shifty_eyed » Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:47 pm

I know for a fact TLSers were accepted to UT last cycle off the waitlist with June scores. I too have suffered from test anxiety and in fact my first retake resulted in no improvement even though I was much better prepared than my first attempt. But by my second retake, I was much calmer and saw some improvement. I still didn't hit my PT average, but I went in with the mindset that any improvement helps. And when you are below median, every point really really counts

Chaucer1343
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:22 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby Chaucer1343 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:13 pm

DA956 wrote:
Chaucer1343 wrote:Is there anything urgent in the admissions pack? I live abroad and it's been almost a month since the pack was sent (and it hasn't arrived).


Not sure how long it takes to get to you overseas, but my acceptance included:
1. Acceptance letter with invite to the Admitted Students Day and some contact info
2. Another letter with additional requirements to be met. (Deposit, letter of intent, official transcript, digital photo, and health paperwork)
3.Some informational brochures on various programs, etc.

Not much I would deem urgent besides maybe the deposit date and the additional requirements stuff. Good luck!


Thanks for the reply. I would guess that the local couriers might have an issue finding the address as it's not in the local language. Overall, the "Letter of Intent" sounds important. Since being accepted, I have just been following the requirements listed on the "current file status" of the FreshLaw page.

Does the "Letter of Intent" have to be completed in conjunction with the paying of the initial deposit? Is this a letter that must be signed and mailed/faxed before a certain date (i.e. the initial deposit deadline)?

User avatar
michaelm55
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:52 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby michaelm55 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:40 pm

ED applicant... still nothing.

User avatar
romanticegotist
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:15 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby romanticegotist » Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:15 pm

Report from the Dean's reception for Austin-only admits: it was great! He's a really nice guy, very easy to talk to. The other 0Ls were interesting and funny and also nice as hell. Some of the partners and associates for Haynes and Boone stopped by to say hello; got the feeling that a UT degree carried weight with them, especially in IP.

Also, would a 15k/year offer from Vandy elicit any matching from Texas? It makes the cost essentially equivalent so someone has to budge, no?

User avatar
shifty_eyed
Posts: 1934
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby shifty_eyed » Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:41 pm

romanticegotist wrote:Report from the Dean's reception for Austin-only admits: it was great! He's a really nice guy, very easy to talk to. The other 0Ls were interesting and funny and also nice as hell. Some of the partners and associates for Haynes and Boone stopped by to say hello; got the feeling that a UT degree carried weight with them, especially in IP.

Also, would a 15k/year offer from Vandy elicit any matching from Texas? It makes the cost essentially equivalent so someone has to budge, no?

I have no idea, but Vandy has slightly higher big form and clerkship placement, as well as more national placement so use that!!

User avatar
eaper
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby eaper » Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:25 pm

hobie2515 wrote:
hobie2515 wrote:So you're saying that when the UT web site states that 66% of the incoming 2011-2012 received need based grants and loans, they are skewing these statistics?


jackbauer10 wrote:Otherwise, yeah, the word "loans" makes UT's statement misleading as to the availability of need-based aid.


This is what I was getting at. I understand lumping the two terms together under one statistic doesn't paint the whole picture, I guess I just wanted someone else to make the claim (or refute it on some level).

And I completely agree about the 33%, that's stunning to me as well. If I was a parent with those means I think I might wait until my kid has actually graduated before I put up $150,000 cash money.


A lot of people in my class have a SO helping out, worked for a few years, or have GI bill stuff.

User avatar
eaper
Posts: 663
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby eaper » Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:31 pm

romanticegotist wrote:Report from the Dean's reception for Austin-only admits: it was great! He's a really nice guy, very easy to talk to. The other 0Ls were interesting and funny and also nice as hell. Some of the partners and associates for Haynes and Boone stopped by to say hello; got the feeling that a UT degree carried weight with them, especially in IP.

Also, would a 15k/year offer from Vandy elicit any matching from Texas? It makes the cost essentially equivalent so someone has to budge, no?


UT matches total cost IIRC. If you have instate from Texas, you'll probably not get anymore, since texas will still be cheaper.

User avatar
mg7
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:15 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby mg7 » Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:05 pm

Had a good time at the admitted students day for UT grads yesterday. Everyone was really welcoming and the dean seems like a really nice guy.

User avatar
StylinNProfilin
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby StylinNProfilin » Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:49 pm

mg7 wrote:Had a good time at the admitted students day for UT grads yesterday. Everyone was really welcoming and the dean seems like a really nice guy.


+1 All the panels were definitely super informative, really enjoyed the mock class.

DA956
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:29 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby DA956 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:39 am

Chaucer1343 wrote:
DA956 wrote:
Chaucer1343 wrote:Is there anything urgent in the admissions pack? I live abroad and it's been almost a month since the pack was sent (and it hasn't arrived).


Not sure how long it takes to get to you overseas, but my acceptance included:
1. Acceptance letter with invite to the Admitted Students Day and some contact info
2. Another letter with additional requirements to be met. (Deposit, letter of intent, official transcript, digital photo, and health paperwork)
3.Some informational brochures on various programs, etc.

Not much I would deem urgent besides maybe the deposit date and the additional requirements stuff. Good luck!


Thanks for the reply. I would guess that the local couriers might have an issue finding the address as it's not in the local language. Overall, the "Letter of Intent" sounds important. Since being accepted, I have just been following the requirements listed on the "current file status" of the FreshLaw page.

Does the "Letter of Intent" have to be completed in conjunction with the paying of the initial deposit? Is this a letter that must be signed and mailed/faxed before a certain date (i.e. the initial deposit deadline)?


According to my packet, the letter of intent will be emailed in early summer with instructions regarding how/when to submit it. It takes the place of a second enrollment deposit, and if you do not submit it as per the instructions you forfeit your deposit and they reserve the right to cancel your admission offer. Hope this helps.

Chaucer1343
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:22 pm

Re: University of TEXAS c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)

Postby Chaucer1343 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:16 pm

DA956 wrote:
Chaucer1343 wrote:
DA956 wrote:
Chaucer1343 wrote:Is there anything urgent in the admissions pack? I live abroad and it's been almost a month since the pack was sent (and it hasn't arrived).


Not sure how long it takes to get to you overseas, but my acceptance included:
1. Acceptance letter with invite to the Admitted Students Day and some contact info
2. Another letter with additional requirements to be met. (Deposit, letter of intent, official transcript, digital photo, and health paperwork)
3.Some informational brochures on various programs, etc.

Not much I would deem urgent besides maybe the deposit date and the additional requirements stuff. Good luck!


Thanks for the reply. I would guess that the local couriers might have an issue finding the address as it's not in the local language. Overall, the "Letter of Intent" sounds important. Since being accepted, I have just been following the requirements listed on the "current file status" of the FreshLaw page.

Does the "Letter of Intent" have to be completed in conjunction with the paying of the initial deposit? Is this a letter that must be signed and mailed/faxed before a certain date (i.e. the initial deposit deadline)?


According to my packet, the letter of intent will be emailed in early summer with instructions regarding how/when to submit it. It takes the place of a second enrollment deposit, and if you do not submit it as per the instructions you forfeit your deposit and they reserve the right to cancel your admission offer. Hope this helps.


Thanks!




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”