Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
wert3813
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wert3813 » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:24 pm

Lar-ties wrote:
wert3813 wrote:Alright. If you want a prediction...post JS1 holds tomorrow.


To advocate for the :twisted: for just a moment, why would applications go on hold in late March? Isn't the point of a hold to gather more information about the applicant pool overall before making further decisions?

What further information would they need to gather at this point in the game? LSAT scores are in, most interviews have been conducted, etc.

I mostly just don't want a post-JS1 hold, but I am also genuinely interested in where my logic is faulty here.


Doubt they would leave a February JS1 hanging till May, but maybe I'm wrong.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:28 pm

Lar-ties wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.

Voted.

Me too.

Natalie is still down by one folks. Remember. Last time I guaranteed JS2s. It happened. Now I'm an official consultant for this thread I demand Natalie wins. I can advise you guys but if you don't do the work there's nothing I can do.

User avatar
trojandave
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby trojandave » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:32 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:
Lar-ties wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.

Voted.

Me too.

Natalie is still down by one folks. Remember. Last time I guaranteed JS2s. It happened. Now I'm an official consultant for this thread I demand Natalie wins. I can advise you guys but if you don't do the work there's nothing I can do.


Damn, she drew the toughest match-up

User avatar
clouded.memory
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby clouded.memory » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:40 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:
Lar-ties wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.

Voted.

Me too.

Natalie is still down by one folks. Remember. Last time I guaranteed JS2s. It happened. Now I'm an official consultant for this thread I demand Natalie wins. I can advise you guys but if you don't do the work there's nothing I can do.

Just voted. Because I really, really want JS2s to go out tomorrow- especially, maybe, for some of the held. :)

User avatar
siredwrdross
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 4:57 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby siredwrdross » Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:45 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.


+1

PRgradBYU
Posts: 1419
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby PRgradBYU » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:00 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:FYI there will be NO JS2S unless Natalie portman wins.


That's a risk I just can't afford to take... she got my vote.

User avatar
Eberry
Posts: 12106
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Eberry » Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:21 pm

Okay, so apparentlybi angered some of the whiney megaposters in that thread. I wanted Natalie to win as a joke and the backlash isn't worth it. If everyone that voted could go back and unvote and/or vote for NINA, I'd be really appreciative.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=206264

User avatar
Lavitz
Posts: 3094
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lavitz » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:06 pm

Eberry wrote:Okay, so apparentlybi angered some of the whiney megaposters in that thread. I wanted Natalie to win as a joke and the backlash isn't worth it. If everyone that voted could go back and unvote and/or vote for NINA, I'd be really appreciative.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=206264

Not happening.

Come at me, megaposters.

jym_dawg
Posts: 294
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:09 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby jym_dawg » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:28 pm

So what kind of movement do y'all think we will see tomorrow, if any? Will it be the usual Friday wls / holds / dings?

User avatar
Eberry
Posts: 12106
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:32 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Eberry » Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:39 pm

Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.

It's not you they'll come at, my friend.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:43 pm

Rooting for H even though they decided they didnt like me

DESTROY THE LOBOS, upset city baby!!!!

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:59 pm

We are heating #3 seed New Mexico right now.

User avatar
trojandave
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby trojandave » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:04 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:We are heating #3 seed New Mexico right now.


Hell yea I'm loving this. If I can have a basketball team to go with my football team life will be good. I think I'm busting out the scotch for the second half

User avatar
Lavitz
Posts: 3094
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lavitz » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:09 pm

Eberry wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.

It's not you they'll come at, my friend.

If they give you any trouble, you can relinquish any responsibility for the votes coming from this thread by directing people to me. People are voting for Natalie because our consultant wannabe said so*. Since I hired him, I'll take full responsibility.


*In my case, I just like Natalie.

User avatar
wert3813
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wert3813 » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:11 pm

Lavitz wrote:
Eberry wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.

It's not you they'll come at, my friend.

If they give you any trouble, you can relinquish any responsibility for the votes coming from this thread by directing people to me. People are voting for Natalie because our consultant wannabe said so*. Since I hired him, I'll take full responsibility.


*In my case, I just like Natalie.


The fact that this isn't a joke is a part of the TLS culture I don't understand at all.

User avatar
SteelPenguin
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby SteelPenguin » Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:39 pm

So i think i'm going to retake in june, score in the 170s, and apply to Harvard. My PS will be about how inspiring Harvard's bball team was this March Madness tournament.

User avatar
Lar-ties
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lar-ties » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:15 am

Lavitz wrote:
Eberry wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Come at me, megaposters.

It's not you they'll come at, my friend.

If they give you any trouble, you can relinquish any responsibility for the votes coming from this thread by directing people to me. People are voting for Natalie because our consultant wannabe said so*. Since I hired him, I'll take full responsibility.


*In my case, I just like Natalie.


No joke. Plus, they used a mediocre picture of her. We were just making up for it.

Shoulda gone with http://24.media.tumblr.com/051b62ece98c ... r1_250.gif

User avatar
John_rizzy_rawls
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby John_rizzy_rawls » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:16 am

Congrats Harvard homies. You killed my bracket but whatevs, you earned it.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:20 am

TWICE AS MANY JS2s WILL BE RELEASED TOMORROW

User avatar
trojandave
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby trojandave » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:24 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:TWICE AS MANY JS2s WILL BE RELEASED TOMORROW


Twice as many deposits will be received too. Woo!

User avatar
zidane13
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:26 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby zidane13 » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:26 am

Ball so hard, Crimson! My local news just made three nerd jokes in a 30 second recap of the game. Probably something to get used to.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:56 am

trojandave wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:TWICE AS MANY JS2s WILL BE RELEASED TOMORROW


Twice as many deposits will be received too. Woo!


oh no. high yield rate as a result of tournament win. fewer js2s?

lol just kidding

go crimson

eyfl
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:28 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby eyfl » Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:41 am

Today is the day!

User avatar
Lar-ties
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lar-ties » Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:09 am

eyfl wrote:Today is the day!


They should use the momentum of last night's win to emotionally hook people with a JS2, thereby ensuring deposits.

I guess what I'm suggesting is, if HLS wants to give its matriculation numbers a little boost, it is in their best interests to make it today.

100% in their interests. I don't really have a preference either way...

TrustInMusic
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:39 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TrustInMusic » Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:18 am

Lar-ties wrote:
eyfl wrote:Today is the day!


They should use the momentum of last night's win to emotionally hook people with a JS2, thereby ensuring deposits.

I guess what I'm suggesting is, if HLS wants to give its matriculation numbers a little boost, it is in their best interests to make it today.

100% in their interests. I don't really have a preference either way...


It was all planned :lol:




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chasima, hellohalo, Houzy, lawschool2017712, notnecessarilyproper, playersball, smashbash, stratton_oakmont and 15 guests