Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
vzapana
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby vzapana » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:10 pm

ph5354a wrote:
ph5354a wrote:Just to make sure I'm reading the OP graphs right --the last round of JS 1s (actual interviews, not requests, I'm assuming) seem to be around the first of April, and then they start up again at the end of May, which I'm assuming is for candidates off the WL. So if we haven't heard anything by the end of March, then we're probably looking at a ding or WL, and WL comes out at the end of April/early May.

Does this sound about right?


Not to distract from the js2-waiters and the counterrevolution going on, but can any other js0 confirm this for me? I need to do some expectations-management here.



To me, it reads that the second week of April is when the JS1s stop temporarily, and the last week of May is when they continue

User avatar
rehsalt
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:32 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby rehsalt » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:11 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.

User avatar
kingsfield69
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby kingsfield69 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm

rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. He don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. He is Lavitz.
Last edited by kingsfield69 on Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:13 pm

rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.

My bad, but I like the confidence!

GertrudeR
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:02 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby GertrudeR » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:15 pm

Ya'll definitely did a good job of keeping the thread alive...by any means necessary. I woke up and saw that the thread was two pages longer and was terrified to check my inbox thinking for sure there was a bloodbath.

lak90
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:56 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby lak90 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:55 pm

When you guys got JS1s, did anything chance on your application status check?

User avatar
carboncopyx
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby carboncopyx » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:55 pm

lak90 wrote:When you guys got JS1s, did anything chance on your application status check?

Not prior to receiving the e-mail. But a few days later, there will be something like "Interview Scheduled" under the mailing list.

vzapana
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby vzapana » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:01 pm

T minus 2 hours until my prediction comes true (or not)

User avatar
broadstreet11
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby broadstreet11 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:03 pm

vzapana wrote:T minus 2 hours until my prediction comes true (or not)


Do we expect the pulls from the held pile to start next week?

User avatar
danielr
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:38 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danielr » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:25 pm

rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.


OH hrm hrm! Let us all swirl our snifters full of cognac simultaneously in a counter-clockwise motion, and smirk at one another knowingly because this is Hahvahd, and we will all one day be masters of the universe.

Pull the crimson-colored stick out of your ass and learn how to take a joke, you stuck up motherfucker.

vzapana
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby vzapana » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:27 pm

danielr wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.


OH hrm hrm! Let us all swirl our snifters full of cognac simultaneously in a counter-clockwise motion, and smirk at one another knowingly because this is Hahvahd, and we will all one day be masters of the universe.

Pull the crimson-colored stick out of your ass and learn how to take a joke, you stuck up motherfucker.


I thought he was being tongue-in-cheek

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby twinkletoes16 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:28 pm

vzapana wrote:
danielr wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.


OH hrm hrm! Let us all swirl our snifters full of cognac simultaneously in a counter-clockwise motion, and smirk at one another knowingly because this is Hahvahd, and we will all one day be masters of the universe.

Pull the crimson-colored stick out of your ass and learn how to take a joke, you stuck up motherfucker.


I thought he was being tongue-in-cheek



he was.

well that escalated quickly...

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:30 pm

Please forgive danielr, commoners lack the mental fortitude to understand what is, to us, a simple joke.

User avatar
kingsfield69
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby kingsfield69 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:34 pm

danielr wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.


OH hrm hrm! Let us all swirl our snifters full of cognac simultaneously in a counter-clockwise motion, and smirk at one another knowingly because this is Hahvahd, and we will all one day be masters of the universe.

Pull the crimson-colored stick out of your ass and learn how to take a joke, you stuck up motherfucker.


Your post implies seething resentment of Harvard. If that's the case, you should consider not trying to go there. And also, consider not posting here. This has been about the most civil and well-behaved forum I've seen. Please don't trash it with this kind of BS.

User avatar
cwid1391
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cwid1391 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:38 pm

danielr wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.


OH hrm hrm! Let us all swirl our snifters full of cognac simultaneously in a counter-clockwise motion, and smirk at one another knowingly because this is Hahvahd, and we will all one day be masters of the universe.

Pull the crimson-colored stick out of your ass and learn how to take a joke, you stuck up motherfucker.


Image

User avatar
danielr
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:38 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danielr » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:40 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:
danielr wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:If we just sit around and do nothing someone else will overtake us and we'll be #3. The exact same thing happened to us in the USNWR rankings.
That, my friend, is the difference between the WUSTL thread and this thread. We don't care if someone thinks we're #2 or #3. This is Harvard.


OH hrm hrm! Let us all swirl our snifters full of cognac simultaneously in a counter-clockwise motion, and smirk at one another knowingly because this is Hahvahd, and we will all one day be masters of the universe.

Pull the crimson-colored stick out of your ass and learn how to take a joke, you stuck up motherfucker.


Your post implies seething resentment of Harvard. If that's the case, you should consider not trying to go there. And also, consider not posting here. This has been about the most civil and well-behaved forum I've seen. Please don't trash it with this kind of BS.


Really, it's more of a resentment (not necessarily "seething") of an attitude that often accompanies people who go, or who want to go, to Harvard. If that's the culture there, then yeah, I guess I resent it.

If rehsalt was in fact joking, then ignore my over-sensitive remarks.

.........wannabelawstudent for new OP of Harvard thread! Who's with us?!

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:45 pm

I go to bed and this thread turns into a shit show. Jesus.

User avatar
bosmer88
Posts: 417
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:07 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby bosmer88 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:46 pm

Why are people trying to overthrow Lavitz? He seems nice enough.

User avatar
jselson
Posts: 6337
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby jselson » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:48 pm

danielr wrote:Really, it's more of a resentment (not necessarily "seething") of an attitude that often accompanies people who go, or who want to go, to Harvard. If that's the culture there, then yeah, I guess I resent it.

If rehsalt was in fact joking, then ignore my over-sensitive remarks.

.........wannabelawstudent for new OP of Harvard thread! Who's with us?!


Man, you're on the wrong side of a lot of things.

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:49 pm

All of this squabbling is trivial compared to some more important matters we have at hand. I think I will take an early tea time to help quell my anticipation.

User avatar
kingsfield69
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:52 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby kingsfield69 » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:52 pm

danielr wrote:
Really, it's more of a resentment (not necessarily "seething") of an attitude that often accompanies people who go, or who want to go, to Harvard. If that's the culture there, then yeah, I guess I resent it.

If rehsalt was in fact joking, then ignore my over-sensitive remarks.

.........wannabelawstudent for new OP of Harvard thread! Who's with us?!


Fair enough on the first point, and I believe he was joking. FWIW, I have seen ZERO haughtiness in my dealings with HLS professors, staff, or current students ... and in fact, the HLS embrace has been exceptionally warm.

On the second point, the soil of this thread has been disproportionately nourished with the blood of a few patriots...and Lavitz is one of them. I cannot sign on to any plan triggering his abdication.

:-)

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:54 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:
Fair enough on the first point, and I believe he was joking. FWIW, I have seen ZERO haughtiness in my dealings with HLS professors, staff, or current students ... and in fact, the HLS embrace has been exceptionally warm.

On the second point, the soil of this thread has been disproportionately nourished with the blood of a few patriots...and Lavitz is one of them. I cannot sign on to any plan triggering his abdication.

:-)

It was merely a suggestion and once I became aware of the people's dislikings to the suggestion, I withdrew my support. Here's to Lavitz! Here Here!

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:55 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:
danielr wrote:
Really, it's more of a resentment (not necessarily "seething") of an attitude that often accompanies people who go, or who want to go, to Harvard. If that's the culture there, then yeah, I guess I resent it.

If rehsalt was in fact joking, then ignore my over-sensitive remarks.

.........wannabelawstudent for new OP of Harvard thread! Who's with us?!


Fair enough on the first point, and I believe he was joking. FWIW, I have seen ZERO haughtiness in my dealings with HLS professors, staff, or current students ... and in fact, the HLS embrace has been exceptionally warm.

On the second point, the soil of this thread has been disproportionately nourished with the blood of a few patriots...and Lavitz is one of them. I cannot sign on to any plan triggering his abdication.

:-)


I've seen laughs of haughtiness in my dealings... they refuse to admit me because "I'm not good enough" or something!

User avatar
Lavitz
Posts: 3094
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lavitz » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:59 pm

Lolwut just happened?

Calm down guys, don't let anyone WUSTL your jimmies.

User avatar
danielr
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:38 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danielr » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:59 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:All of this squabbling is trivial compared to some more important matters we have at hand. I think I will take an early tea time to help quell my anticipation.


Will you be enjoying scones as well, sir?

Also, it looks like you have effected, yet again, another failed coup of OP. When they take you to the guillotine, don't say I never tried to support you.


@kingsfield: I'm sure you're right. I only know a few Harvard grads (one HLS grad), but they are all pretty down to earth.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”