Seriously. And if not Harvard, pick Indiana to win it all. Because that's going to happen.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahaha whatever you do, do not be the noob who always picks the higher seeded teamlak90 wrote:ohh... my firm is doing a bracket and I have literally no clue. Someone help me!Lar-ties wrote:The REAL question in all of this is:
Who is starting the thread bracket pool?
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- gingerbreadsmouse
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
@Lar-ties: aw, Jimmy :) that'll teach me to feel downtrodden!
@bracket newbie (sorry, doing a few things and forgot to quote people): agreed with above -- spot the more likely upsets! And don't go Gonzaga!
@bracket newbie (sorry, doing a few things and forgot to quote people): agreed with above -- spot the more likely upsets! And don't go Gonzaga!
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:56 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ohpobrecito wrote:Seriously. And if not Harvard, pick Indiana to win it all. Because that's going to happen.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahaha whatever you do, do not be the noob who always picks the higher seeded teamlak90 wrote:ohh... my firm is doing a bracket and I have literally no clue. Someone help me!Lar-ties wrote:The REAL question in all of this is:
Who is starting the thread bracket pool?
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:39 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Not always a terrible way to go if you have no idea what you're doing. But if you want to mix it up a little, flip a coin for the "closer" games (seed difference less 3 or 4 or so).ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahaha whatever you do, do not be the noob who always picks the higher seeded teamlak90 wrote:ohh... my firm is doing a bracket and I have literally no clue. Someone help me!Lar-ties wrote:The REAL question in all of this is:
Who is starting the thread bracket pool?
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also, UCLA is going to lose.arrggg wrote:Not always a terrible way to go if you have no idea what you're doing. But if you want to mix it up a little, flip a coin for the "closer" games (seed difference less 3 or 4 or so).ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahaha whatever you do, do not be the noob who always picks the higher seeded teamlak90 wrote:ohh... my firm is doing a bracket and I have literally no clue. Someone help me!Lar-ties wrote:The REAL question in all of this is:
Who is starting the thread bracket pool?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Pick the higher ranked law school. Should make for an interesting bracket.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahaha whatever you do, do not be the noob who always picks the higher seeded teamlak90 wrote:ohh... my firm is doing a bracket and I have literally no clue. Someone help me!Lar-ties wrote:The REAL question in all of this is:
Who is starting the thread bracket pool?
- broadstreet11
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Final Four would be:ph5354a wrote:Pick the higher ranked law school. Should make for an interesting bracket.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Hahaha whatever you do, do not be the noob who always picks the higher seeded teamlak90 wrote:ohh... my firm is doing a bracket and I have literally no clue. Someone help me!Lar-ties wrote:The REAL question in all of this is:
Who is starting the thread bracket pool?
Duke
Harvard
Michigan
Cal
- Rlabo
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Realistically, Duke and Michigan have good shots this year to win so those 4 are not crazy
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I have Duke to win it all! Michigan and Berkeley, not so much. Harvard, LOLRlabo wrote:Realistically, Duke and Michigan have good shots this year to win so those 4 are not crazy
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I will make my bracket based on my applications to law school.
Notre Dame loses first round.
Notre Dame loses first round.
- gingerbreadsmouse
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ManOfTheMinute wrote:I have Duke to win it all! Michigan and Berkeley, not so much. Harvard, LOLRlabo wrote:Realistically, Duke and Michigan have good shots this year to win so those 4 are not crazy
Go.duke!
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Cal is drastically under-seeded. They're as good or better than UNLV, although they will almost certainly get rocked by 'Cuse in the second round.ManOfTheMinute wrote:I have Duke to win it all! Michigan and Berkeley, not so much. Harvard, LOLRlabo wrote:Realistically, Duke and Michigan have good shots this year to win so those 4 are not crazy
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Maybe. We lost to them at home this season and we're too inconsistent. If we're really on, we can win.cwid1391 wrote:Cal is drastically under-seeded. They're as good or better than UNLV, although they will almost certainly get rocked by 'Cuse in the second round.ManOfTheMinute wrote:I have Duke to win it all! Michigan and Berkeley, not so much. Harvard, LOLRlabo wrote:Realistically, Duke and Michigan have good shots this year to win so those 4 are not crazy
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lar-ties
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
All about Oregon.helix23 wrote:Maybe. We lost to them at home this season and we're too inconsistent. If we're really on, we can win.cwid1391 wrote:Cal is drastically under-seeded. They're as good or better than UNLV, although they will almost certainly get rocked by 'Cuse in the second round.ManOfTheMinute wrote:I have Duke to win it all! Michigan and Berkeley, not so much. Harvard, LOLRlabo wrote:Realistically, Duke and Michigan have good shots this year to win so those 4 are not crazy
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lol okLar-ties wrote:
All about Oregon.
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
so, looking at last yeras LSN, looks like we are in for a big reject wave right around 4/20 and a huge wait list wave right around 4/30 - 5/1. with some acceptances until then
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
also, Hoya Saxa.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:43 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Did they ever wait weeks without acceptances?az21833 wrote:so, looking at last yeras LSN, looks like we are in for a big reject wave right around 4/20 and a huge wait list wave right around 4/30 - 5/1. with some acceptances until then
Last edited by joeycrack on Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Harvard thread...this lack of action regarding JS2's can not go unpunished. Harvard has laughed in our faces when presented with dogs. TIME FOR ACTION
- Lar-ties
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So....tomorrow, right?
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
thoughts on whether any more JS1s will go out, and, if so, when?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
probably nothing will happen until next Tuesday i bet
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
- gingerbreadsmouse
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1Audeamus wrote:thoughts on whether any more JS1s will go out, and, if so, when?
Especially for dog-lovers!
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You don't think there will be any action on Friday?az21833 wrote:probably nothing will happen until next Tuesday i bet
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login