Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Cicero76 · Post by **Cicero76** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:27 pm

banjo wrote:
joeycrack wrote:What time?
like five minutes ago - 176/3.76

When were you complete?

banjo · Post by **banjo** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:40 pm

Cicero76 wrote:
banjo wrote:
joeycrack wrote:What time?
like five minutes ago - 176/3.76
When were you complete?

10/10. I also have a much older lsat score in the low 160s

Lavitz · Post by **Lavitz** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:05 pm

Congrats guys!

kingsfield69 · Post by **kingsfield69** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:06 pm

JS1!

Received email at 11:17 EST.

164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.

LSATSCORES2012 · Post by **LSATSCORES2012** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:10 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!

Received email at 11:17 EST.

164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.

Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?

No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!

ETA: your profile says 167?

Anonymous4444 · Post by **Anonymous4444** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:14 pm

Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml

kingsfield69 · Post by **kingsfield69** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:14 pm

LSATSCORES2012 wrote:
kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!

Received email at 11:17 EST.

164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?

No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!

The profile is right -- not a URM. But I'm a non-trad veteran with considerable/unique work experiences. Even w/ the softs though, I did not realistically expect anything and certainly not this early in the sequence. Time to prep for an interview -- thanks for the good karma and good luck to you.

EDIT: profile updated with accurate LSAT.

kingsfield69 · Post by **kingsfield69** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:49 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml

Congrats! Huge!

yarsten · Post by **yarsten** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:51 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml

Same boat here. Chicago is exciting, but I'm still waiting for that JS1...

helix23 · Post by **helix23** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:52 pm

Congrats guys! Very exciting

harveyfan · Post by **harveyfan** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:52 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:
kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!

Received email at 11:17 EST.

164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?

No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!
The profile is right -- not a URM. But I'm a non-trad veteran with considerable/unique work experiences. Even w/ the softs though, I did not realistically expect anything and certainly not this early in the sequence. Time to prep for an interview -- thanks for the good karma and good luck to you.

EDIT: profile updated with accurate LSAT.

Congrats! It seems like you are having an amazing cycle! I hope mine goes half as well as yours!

Anonymous4444 · Post by **Anonymous4444** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:53 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:Just got a Chicago interview lol was about to be so pumped ihml
Congrats! Huge!

thanks and huge congrats to you i know how badly u want that interview.
hopefully ill get one too soon enough.

helix23 · Post by **helix23** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:57 pm

To be honest, I'm not really used to being a wallflower so just warning you there might be another wave of poetry coming.

Anonymous4444 · Post by **Anonymous4444** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:01 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:At this point ID be happy for an interview from Chicago.

somebody. interview. me. now.

man am i emb i wrote this. yes im aware i may be a profit

kuddlykoala · Post by **kuddlykoala** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:03 pm

I thought everyone who applied this year was getting an interview.

shntn · Post by **shntn** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:04 pm

kuddlykoala wrote:I thought everyone who applied this year was getting an interview.

wut

kuddlykoala · Post by **kuddlykoala** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:06 pm

https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/

http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html

well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive

aloyshakaramazov · Post by **aloyshakaramazov** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:11 pm

kuddlykoala wrote:https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/

http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html

well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive

Still don't know how they plan to do this with longer interviews....but hey, great for them if they want to interview more people!

Anonymous4444 · Post by **Anonymous4444** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:13 pm

aloyshakaramazov wrote:
kuddlykoala wrote:https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/

http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html

well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive
Still don't know how they plan to do this with longer interviews....but hey, great for them if they want to interview more people!

random just got ur username happen to be reading that book now lol

aloyshakaramazov · Post by **aloyshakaramazov** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:16 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote: random just got ur username happen to be reading that book now lol

Yeah dude. Aloysha's clearly awesome PS would make him a shoe-in at HYS

Great book though. One of the most under-rated trials in literature is the trial in part 11/12 of BK. Like nine lawyers pass out because they give such impassioned speeches.

ScratchableItch · Post by **ScratchableItch** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:21 pm

kuddlykoala wrote:https://blogs.law.harvard.edu/admission ... g-process/

http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2012/10 ... views.html

well I guess not everyone...but supposedly more expansive

This interview makes it more clear:
http://www.admissionsdean.com/researchi ... sica-soban

In the past they've interviewed around 1000 and accepted about 850, creating a class of about 550.

This year they're aiming to interview around 1200 applicants, so they're expanding it by 200 folks or so.

Congrats to all the new interviews!

kuddlykoala · Post by **kuddlykoala** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 2:25 pm

yes yes congrats!

didn't mean to take away from the excitement of it all

hdivine · Post by **hdivine** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:28 pm

You know, when you look at yield rate for Harvard (2/3), it means that they have to admit roughly 850 people to fill their 560-person class. 850 JS2s out of 1200 JS1s is pretty substantial. Suffice it to say, a JS1 is a really good sign.

sinfiery · Post by **sinfiery** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:58 pm

Congratz to all JS1s today!

ssanonymous · Post by **ssanonymous** » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:10 pm

kingsfield69 wrote:
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:
kingsfield69 wrote:JS1!

Received email at 11:17 EST.

164/3.89. Submitted 9/16, Complete 10/10.
Can you verify that your profile is correct and that you are not a URM? If so, is there anything... unique about your application?

No matter what... Congrats to you, and all of you!
The profile is right -- not a URM. But I'm a non-trad veteran with considerable/unique work experiences. Even w/ the softs though, I did not realistically expect anything and certainly not this early in the sequence. Time to prep for an interview -- thanks for the good karma and good luck to you.

EDIT: profile updated with accurate LSAT.

So pumped about your JS1. I love it when law schools see value in an applicant outside of the typical, rigid numbers. Pretty surprising for HLS this early on in the cycle. Well, I hope you get in!

Congrats to everyone else! Rooting for y'all

Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register for access!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?