Have you decided where you're going yet TripTrip? Your cycle is totally perplexing to me...but in the grand scheme of things you still have good choicesTripTrip wrote:Withdrew today. Good luck!
Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:20 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, I haven't. However, I got equal scholarships from NU and Gtown, and who would take Gtown over NU at the same price?swordking90 wrote:Have you decided where you're going yet TripTrip? Your cycle is totally perplexing to me...but in the grand scheme of things you still have good choicesTripTrip wrote:Withdrew today. Good luck!
- InBetweenDays
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I received my status-check credentials on 2/16, and my status date is still 2/28. I'm URM, if that makes a difference...
Is this bad news? Should I be assuming (as I am) that they are totally disinterested? Any insight would be much appreciated!
Is this bad news? Should I be assuming (as I am) that they are totally disinterested? Any insight would be much appreciated!
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 1:39 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
To be honest, u being urm is irrelevant. I think u just have to wait it out. I dont think this is either positve/negative...InBetweenDays wrote:I received my status-check credentials on 2/16, and my status date is still 2/28. I'm URM, if that makes a difference...
Is this bad news? Should I be assuming (as I am) that they are totally disinterested? Any insight would be much appreciated!
- InBetweenDays
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I've heard that some schools throw all the borderline accept/reject URM apps in a pile to be reviewed at the end of the cycle... which is why I mentioned it.account1 wrote:To be honest, u being urm is irrelevant. I think u just have to wait it out. I dont think this is either positve/negative...InBetweenDays wrote:I received my status-check credentials on 2/16, and my status date is still 2/28. I'm URM, if that makes a difference...
Is this bad news? Should I be assuming (as I am) that they are totally disinterested? Any insight would be much appreciated!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ssanonymous
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Withdrew. Good luck!
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 6:21 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Could my file be under review without the word review in the online status checker? For example, I know that Duke's online status checker says 'under review' I finished an interview and there was an update on the date, but it still says application complete.
- danielr
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:38 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't see why this is such a self-evident choice. I would take GTown over NU at the same price. It's a matter of preference. It's not like you're asking who would rather go to George Washington over Yale at the same price.TripTrip wrote:No, I haven't. However, I got equal scholarships from NU and Gtown, and who would take Gtown over NU at the same price?swordking90 wrote:Have you decided where you're going yet TripTrip? Your cycle is totally perplexing to me...but in the grand scheme of things you still have good choicesTripTrip wrote:Withdrew today. Good luck!
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
NU is the obvious choice for biglaw, statistically and anecdotally speaking. I'd take Gtown over NU if I knew I wanted government/PI though. so you're right, it does depend. but then I would apply for one of the special scholarship programsdanielr wrote:I don't see why this is such a self-evident choice. I would take GTown over NU at the same price. It's a matter of preference. It's not like you're asking who would rather go to George Washington over Yale at the same price.TripTrip wrote:No, I haven't. However, I got equal scholarships from NU and Gtown, and who would take Gtown over NU at the same price?swordking90 wrote:Have you decided where you're going yet TripTrip? Your cycle is totally perplexing to me...but in the grand scheme of things you still have good choicesTripTrip wrote:Withdrew today. Good luck!
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes, personal preference does matter. But like above, if my preference were PI, I'd be considering Gtown more for the LRAP.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:55 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Has any of those who were promised to get a scholarship feedback on April 5th but didn't got an email from the office promising to give us an update by April 22nd?
The process is like spinning...
The process is like spinning...
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When the 5th came and went with no word, I withdrew on the 6th. After being stalled for months, receiving an unpleasant phone call basically prepping me for a low-ball offer, and then missing a deadline w/ zero explanation, it was just the last straw for me. Best of luck all.carol0131 wrote:Has any of those who were promised to get a scholarship feedback on April 5th but didn't got an email from the office promising to give us an update by April 22nd?
The process is like spinning...
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:16 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I received an offer yesterday. Despite my low expectations, it still managed to disappoint me.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:12 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. I'll be withdrawing.Iamnotworthy wrote:I received an offer yesterday. Despite my low expectations, it still managed to disappoint me.
- txdude45
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Add me to the list. A lot of spots about to open up at GULCturn left wrote:Same. I'll be withdrawing.Iamnotworthy wrote:I received an offer yesterday. Despite my low expectations, it still managed to disappoint me.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yea -- if they don't up it, i'm peacing out. its been real DCtxdude45 wrote:Add me to the list. A lot of spots about to open up at GULCturn left wrote:Same. I'll be withdrawing.Iamnotworthy wrote:I received an offer yesterday. Despite my low expectations, it still managed to disappoint me.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yea I definitely agree. Dean Schwartz is so easy to work with. Although UT almost seems more promising strictly rankings-wise than ucla just because they have such a hold on an entire state market while ucla competes with stanford/cal.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
That said, andrew cornblatt does come off as a very warm and well meaning person so I do not wish him ill. they just seem disorganized.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Oh, I'm not wishing anyone gets fired. Just saying that it would not surprise me one bit.jbagelboy wrote:Yea I definitely agree. Dean Schwartz is so easy to work with. Although UT almost seems more promising strictly rankings-wise than ucla just because they have such a hold on an entire state market while ucla competes with stanford/cal.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
That said, andrew cornblatt does come off as a very warm and well meaning person so I do not wish him ill. they just seem disorganized.
I said UCLA might rise just because I think they have the best chance of having the highest medians of that sub group. UT I think has a better national reputation and maybe even faculty reputation but they are handcuffed by the high percentage of Texans they have to matriculate. Would not surprise me to see their medians drop again, especially if they gun for a larger class size this year like rumors say they will.
- danielr
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:38 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This is ridiculous. You act as if every single law school applicant were on TLS, and they are all dissatisfied with the way their scholarships panned out. Georgetown's process of awarding merit aid may not have been the best, but I doubt anyone would get fired over it.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
Do tell us, what else do you see in your crystal ball???
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Georgetown won't have any problem filling a class. I just don't think the numbers will be all that close to last year's. The Dean already said publically that he thought the median will be a "169 or 168" but that was before this disaster so I think it will probably be even worse.danielr wrote:This is ridiculous. You act as if every single law school applicant were on TLS, and they are all dissatisfied with the way their scholarships panned out. Georgetown's process of awarding merit aid may not have been the best, but I doubt anyone would get fired over it.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
Do tell us, what else do you see in your crystal ball???
How about a friendly wager: I predict their median will drop to a 167 or below. Anything 168 and above, you win. Winner chooses the other's avatar for a year. Deal?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- intlsplitr
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 9:00 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This thread just got interesting....BigZuck wrote:Georgetown won't have any problem filling a class. I just don't think the numbers will be all that close to last year's. The Dean already said publically that he thought the median will be a "169 or 168" but that was before this disaster so I think it will probably be even worse.danielr wrote:This is ridiculous. You act as if every single law school applicant were on TLS, and they are all dissatisfied with the way their scholarships panned out. Georgetown's process of awarding merit aid may not have been the best, but I doubt anyone would get fired over it.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
Do tell us, what else do you see in your crystal ball???
How about a friendly wager: I predict their median will drop to a 167 or below. Anything 168 and above, you win. Winner chooses the other's avatar for a year. Deal?
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My prediction is extreme apparently so I might as well put my money where my mouth is.intlsplitr wrote:This thread just got interesting....BigZuck wrote:Georgetown won't have any problem filling a class. I just don't think the numbers will be all that close to last year's. The Dean already said publically that he thought the median will be a "169 or 168" but that was before this disaster so I think it will probably be even worse.danielr wrote:This is ridiculous. You act as if every single law school applicant were on TLS, and they are all dissatisfied with the way their scholarships panned out. Georgetown's process of awarding merit aid may not have been the best, but I doubt anyone would get fired over it.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
Do tell us, what else do you see in your crystal ball???
How about a friendly wager: I predict their median will drop to a 167 or below. Anything 168 and above, you win. Winner chooses the other's avatar for a year. Deal?
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:59 pm
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got in. Dean mentioned my interviewers recc in the note on my letter. Guess the USA is an indicator.
99% on going. Although, with this talk maybe I should be going to UCLA. However, I'll take my chances with the great Georgetown meltdown.
99% on going. Although, with this talk maybe I should be going to UCLA. However, I'll take my chances with the great Georgetown meltdown.
Last edited by CourCour on Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Rlabo
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Georgetown c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This is a pretty unfair wager just because the medians of most law schools will probably drop this year if only because of the drop in applications, especially ones with strong LSAT scores. It seems like you see their merit aid strategy as a complete blotch as it discouraged top candidates (lets assume 175+)? The absence of these wouldn't drive down GULC's medians if they replace them and a number of their below 25th applicants with scores closer to their medians and essentially tighten the margin. The biggest problem is that GULC's size most probably limits their ability to do this to some degree.BigZuck wrote:Georgetown won't have any problem filling a class. I just don't think the numbers will be all that close to last year's. The Dean already said publically that he thought the median will be a "169 or 168" but that was before this disaster so I think it will probably be even worse.danielr wrote:This is ridiculous. You act as if every single law school applicant were on TLS, and they are all dissatisfied with the way their scholarships panned out. Georgetown's process of awarding merit aid may not have been the best, but I doubt anyone would get fired over it.BigZuck wrote:Lol @ Georgetown this cycle. When all this started I assumed the Dean of Admissions would get fired for this epic botch job but its become so bad I wonder if the Dean of the law school himself will get fired. I'm sure their median will drop at least a point but probably two. Would not at all surprise me if UCLA moves into that 14th spot and stays there considering how aggressively generous they have been this cycle.
Do tell us, what else do you see in your crystal ball???
How about a friendly wager: I predict their median will drop to a 167 or below. Anything 168 and above, you win. Winner chooses the other's avatar for a year. Deal?
Regardless of all of this you wouldn't be able to attribute a drop in medians with the scholarship strategy. It would be weak correlation at best. I know you didn't directly say that scholarship would be the reason why medians may drop slightly, but everything said so far pointed to that.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login