-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have updated the Decision Date Graphs and Spreadsheets to reflect the 2011-2012 cycle. A special thanks to TLS user LSATSCORES2012 for providing the raw data dump from his work on mylsn.info. He helped to cut a two week job down to three days. He is credited on the spreadsheet, but the graphs would also not have been made without his data dump.
Decision Date Spreadsheets, 2011-2012 Cycle
You can view the Decision Date Spreadsheets here. Each school is on a different tab at the bottom:
Link to Google Doc
Decision Date Graphs, 2011-2012 Cycle
The Decision Date Graphs are shown below. For reference, the 2009-2010 graphs are shown first, followed by the 2011-2012 graphs.
How to read the graphs:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Decisions are sorted in weekly increments. On the x-axis, Dec-2 denotes the first full week of December, while Nov/Dec denotes the week that starts in November and ends in December. A week begins on Sunday and ends on Saturday. The tic marks on the x-axis represent the weeks. The data points representing decisions that came out during that week will lie directly above the label for that week.
Yale Law School (New Haven, CT)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Stanford Law School (Stanford, CA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Harvard Law School (Cambridge, MA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Columbia Law School (New York, NY)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Chicago Law School (Chicago, IL)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
New York University Law School (New York, NY)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of California, Berkeley School of Law (Berkeley, CA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
university of pennsylvania law school (Philadelphia, PA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Virginia School of Law (Charlottesville, VA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Michigan Law School (Ann Arbor, MI)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Duke University School of Law (Durham, NC)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Northwestern University Law School (Chicago, IL)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Georgetown University Law Center (Washington, DC)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Cornell Law School (Ithaca, NY)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of California, Los Angeles School of Law (Los Angeles, CA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Texas School of Law (Austin, TX)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Vanderbilt Law School (Nashville, TN)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Southern California School of Law (Los Angeles, CA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Minnesota Law School (Minneapolis, MN)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
George Washington University Law School (Washington, DC)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Washington School of Law (Seattle, WA)
No 2009-2010 Graph
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Notre Dame Law School (South Bend, IN)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Washington University in St. Louis Law School (St. Louis, MO)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Emory University School of Law (Atlanta, GA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Washington & Lee University School of Law (Lexington, VA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Arizona State University College of Law (Tempe, AZ)
No 2009-2010 Graph
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Boston University School of Law (Boston, MA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Indiana University, Bloomington School of Law (Bloomington, IN)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Alabama School of Law (Tuscaloosa, AL)
No 2009-2010 Graph
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Boston College Law School (Newton, MA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
Fordham University School of Law (New York, NY)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of Iowa College of Law (Iowa City, IA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
University of California, Davis School of Law (Davis, CA)
2009-2010 (Click to Enlarge)
2011-2012 (Click to Enlarge)
The same caveats to the old graphs apply to the new graphs:
Changes from the old cycle that may impact the 2011-2012 cycle graphs:1. A glance at the acceptance rates at the schools in question will reveal that most of the graphs are an inaccurate indicator of a candidate's chances of admission. In general, the graphs are skewed towards acceptances. It is possible that applicants are more likely to report a decision date when they are accepted than when they are rejected or waitlisted, or that applicants who spend time analyzing and reporting their own admissions statistics are, on average, more qualified than the typical candidate. The viewer should be aware that a graph's rejection and waitlist humps may be misleadingly low and should take care to look up the school's acceptance rate rather than drawing conclusions about his/her chances of admission based on the graph. For some schools, waitlists far outnumber rejections, indicating that reporting bias may have skewed the data towards waitlists as well as acceptances.
2. No users were double-counted. This means that each WL/admit or WL/reject applicant was part of some initial waitlist batch but is not included in that category on the graph.
3. For decisions that were sent through the postal service rather than through e-mail or status checkers, some applicants reported the decision date as the date when their letters were postmarked, while others reported the date when they received the letter. No attempt was made to standardize these. However, the fact that decision dates are sorted by week rather than by day minimizes the difference between the two.
4. For schools that have part-time programs, no distinction was made between part-time and full-time applications.
Things to take note of for the future:1. Northwestern University's ED program now includes a full tuition scholarship.
2. Boston University added an ED program which also includes a full tuition scholarship.
3. Duke now has two ED rounds as well as the priority track.
1. Northwestern & BU are continuing their full-ride ED programs.
2. Cornell Law School received a $25 million dollar donation which will partially be used to fund scholarships - we may see a full-ride ED program soon in addition to its EA program (maybe not this cycle, but potentially in future cycles.
3. Rankings have changed on the lower end of the T30 significantly since two years ago and will likely continue to fluctuate if the current law school applicant trends continue.
4. This is Chicago's last year giving out Ruby's.
5. Chicago has started a binding early admit program for its own undergrads and alums with a deadline of September 1 and decisions being rendered by mid-October to mid-November. This should change the Chicago graph starting this cycle.
6. Penn now has two rounds of ED.