Page 32 of 175

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:59 pm
by housebro13
bosmer88 wrote:That little comic might have been funny to me had the imagery not questionably veered into sambo territory.
+1

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:00 pm
by starrydreamz3
Ugh I'm getting impatient for you guys to get your acceptances as well! It's so quiet over in the Columbia Class of 2016 forum. =D

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:02 pm
by Rahviveh
starrydreamz3 wrote:Ugh I'm getting impatient for you guys to get your acceptances as well! It's so quiet over in the Columbia Class of 2016 forum. =D
+1 Chi thread is even more dead lol

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:06 pm
by Lavitz
housebro13 wrote:
bosmer88 wrote:That little comic might have been funny to me had the imagery not questionably veered into sambo territory.
+1
I don't really see it, but removed anyway.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:24 pm
by bosmer88
Lavitz wrote:
housebro13 wrote:
bosmer88 wrote:That little comic might have been funny to me had the imagery not questionably veered into sambo territory.
+1
I don't really see it, but removed anyway.
I appreciate you removing it Lavitz. The comic uses imagery that exaggerates features commonly associated with black people. While there is nothing inherently wrong with dark, black skin or thick, bright red lips, the sambo caricature uses them in a way as to demean darker-skinned people. The imagery depicts them as buffonish, cartoonish, simple-minded, and essentially as sub-human. The "black sambo" is a historical phenomenon and has been used in a variety of advertisements, games, household products, etc. I admit that the imagery is not as prevalent as it once was. Still, I have seen the imagery in use in places such as Austrailia, England, parts of the United States, and surprisingly even Japan.

I know you didn't create it, but I'd figure a little background on why the comic can be construed as offensive wouldn't hurt.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:25 pm
by Rahviveh
bosmer88 wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
housebro13 wrote:
bosmer88 wrote:That little comic might have been funny to me had the imagery not questionably veered into sambo territory.
+1
I don't really see it, but removed anyway.
I appreciate you removing it Lavitz. The comic uses imagery that exaggerates features commonly associated with black people. While there is nothing inherently wrong with dark, black skin or thick, bright red lips, the sambo caricature uses them in a way as to demean darker-skinned people. The imagery depicts them as buffonish, cartoonish, simple-minded, and essentially as sub-human. The "black sambo" is a historical phenomenon and has been used in a variety of advertisements, games, household products, etc. I admit that the imagery is not as prevalent as it once was. Still, I have seen the imagery in use in places such as Austrailia, England, parts of the United States, and surprisingly even Japan.
I agree, though I doubt it was done intentionally.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:33 pm
by bosmer88
For the most part, when I have seen the imagery used, it is usually with relics or antiques from quite a bit ago. The only current example I can think of is with Japan. I saw indoor slippers that used the imagery. Of course, the Japanese people had no idea why they would be considered offensive. They thought the shoes were cute.

edited

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:53 pm
by Anonymous4444
please Columbia start accepting us!!!!

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:11 pm
by chadbrochill
Checking in :)

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:18 pm
by sinfiery
chadbrochill wrote:Checking in :)
Submitted 1/09/13
welcome to the wait! :D

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:19 pm
by venus
So it seems like December LSAT takers were down again by a lot. This gives me some hope even with my low LSAT score :)
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... stered.asp

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:22 pm
by Anonymous4444
venus wrote:So it seems like December LSAT takers were down again by a lot. This gives me some hope even with my low LSAT score :)
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... stered.asp
things are getting int

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:37 pm
by carboncopyx
venus wrote:So it seems like December LSAT takers were down again by a lot. This gives me some hope even with my low LSAT score :)
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... stered.asp
Either medians are going to drop, or Columbia's going to have to dole out serious money to entice people away from YHS... no better time to apply than right now, I guess.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 5:14 pm
by ManOfTheMinute
chadbrochill wrote:Checking in :)
Submitted 1/09/13
I submitted 1/08/13! We can wait together

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:01 pm
by starrydreamz3
carboncopyx wrote:
venus wrote:So it seems like December LSAT takers were down again by a lot. This gives me some hope even with my low LSAT score :)
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... stered.asp
Either medians are going to drop, or Columbia's going to have to dole out serious money to entice people away from YHS... no better time to apply than right now, I guess.
Bah wish I had applied during this cycle, probably could have gotten more money! (Maybe not from Columbia, but other places for sure!)

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:31 pm
by spyke123
when do you guys think the first wave of VCE will arrive? week of 28th?

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:41 pm
by bob loblaw11
harveyfan wrote:
HarveyFan, any update on this?
I got my complete email late last night. Hopefully yours rolls in soon, or you should just email them to expedite the process!
Took your advice and just went complete. Ah!

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:41 pm
by ph5354a
bob loblaw11 wrote:
harveyfan wrote:
HarveyFan, any update on this?
I got my complete email late last night. Hopefully yours rolls in soon, or you should just email them to expedite the process!
Took your advice and just went complete. Ah!
Hey all --I'm in a similar boat, submitted 1/3 and still completion pending, though it looks like they have all the components of my app. How long did you guys wait before emailing them?

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:45 pm
by bananapudding88
ph5354a wrote:
bob loblaw11 wrote:
harveyfan wrote:
HarveyFan, any update on this?
I got my complete email late last night. Hopefully yours rolls in soon, or you should just email them to expedite the process!
Took your advice and just went complete. Ah!
Hey all --I'm in a similar boat, submitted 1/3 and still completion pending, though it looks like they have all the components of my app. How long did you guys wait before emailing them?
Submitted 12/18, only got the "Complete" email from them last night. Didn't email them since it seems they usually take a while.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:06 pm
by bob loblaw11
ph5354a, I'd wait in your case. Their website says allow "at least" two weeks so I gave them closer to four with the holidays. Good luck, I hope it moves quickly for you.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 4:21 pm
by ph5354a
bob loblaw11 wrote:ph5354a, I'd wait in your case. Their website says allow "at least" two weeks so I gave them closer to four with the holidays. Good luck, I hope it moves quickly for you.
Submitted 12/18, only got the "Complete" email from them last night. Didn't email them since it seems they usually take a while.
Thank you both! I'll settle in for the long haul.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:07 pm
by spyke123
ph5354a wrote:
bob loblaw11 wrote:ph5354a, I'd wait in your case. Their website says allow "at least" two weeks so I gave them closer to four with the holidays. Good luck, I hope it moves quickly for you.
Submitted 12/18, only got the "Complete" email from them last night. Didn't email them since it seems they usually take a while.
Thank you both! I'll settle in for the long haul.

hmm thats odd.. i went complete within a day or two of submitting..

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:07 pm
by ph5354a
spyke123 wrote:
ph5354a wrote:
bob loblaw11 wrote:ph5354a, I'd wait in your case. Their website says allow "at least" two weeks so I gave them closer to four with the holidays. Good luck, I hope it moves quickly for you.
Thank you both! I'll settle in for the long haul.

hmm thats odd.. i went complete within a day or two of submitting..

Update: just got the completion email!
ETA: Columbia has one if the most optimistic, enthusiastic complete emails I've ever seen.

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:09 am
by TripTrip
ph5354a wrote:just got the completion email!
Me too! Loved it. After just one week, too!

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:17 am
by az21833
I am complete in morningside as well