Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:04 am

Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.



+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.

User avatar
txdude45
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby txdude45 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:25 am

twinkletoes16 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.



+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.


Loving the new 'tar

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:27 am

txdude45 wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.



+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.


Loving the new 'tar



it was between this and a Clueless/Alicia Silverstone 'tar but I'm actually a Mean Girl so decided on this. :roll:

User avatar
carboncopyx
Posts: 671
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby carboncopyx » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:48 am

txdude45 wrote:Loving the new 'tar

Seconded. Mean Girls ftw!

User avatar
trojandave
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby trojandave » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:49 am

twinkletoes16 wrote:
txdude45 wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Goodman wrote:Still nothing. Getting nervous. Happy for new admits, though.



+1 i haven't had ANY mail the last few days. extra depressing. no pizza coupons, nothing.


Loving the new 'tar



it was between this and a Clueless/Alicia Silverstone 'tar but I'm actually a Mean Girl so decided on this. :roll:


Is butter a carb? ;)

BigZuck
Posts: 10883
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby BigZuck » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:59 am

Not sure why but something tells me that twinkle and carbon would make one hell of a set of frenemies.

User avatar
txdude45
Posts: 912
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:25 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby txdude45 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:01 am

BigZuck wrote:Not sure why but something tells me that twinkle and carbon would make one hell of a set of frenemies.


+1. I know I wouldn't cross either of them.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:16 am

carboncopyx wrote:
txdude45 wrote:Loving the new 'tar

Seconded. Mean Girls ftw!


No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:33 am

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
carboncopyx wrote:
txdude45 wrote:Loving the new 'tar

Seconded. Mean Girls ftw!


No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female



I'm done changing. Relax homie.

User avatar
ph5354a
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ph5354a » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:35 am

My phone just autocorrected nice to NCE.

Post-Columbia Stress Disorder?

User avatar
TripTrip
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:39 am

twinkletoes16 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female



I'm done changing. Relax homie.

Too late. I already view you as a completely different person.

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:41 am

TripTrip wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female



I'm done changing. Relax homie.

Too late. I already view you as a completely different person.



Image

toothbrush
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby toothbrush » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:44 am

ph5354a wrote:My phone just autocorrected nice to NCE.

Post-Columbia Stress Disorder?

lmao yeah I knew that I was pretty obsessed when my phone had EVERY abbreviation I ever use on TLS in it as if they're real words... (gulc, loci, etc )

User avatar
TripTrip
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:59 am

toothbrush wrote:
ph5354a wrote:My phone just autocorrected nice to NCE.

Post-Columbia Stress Disorder?

lmao yeah I knew that I was pretty obsessed when my phone had EVERY abbreviation I ever use on TLS in it as if they're real words... (gulc, loci, etc )

Ha. I haven't gone quite that far... yet.

User avatar
Audeamus
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Audeamus » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:01 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
TripTrip wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
No! people need to stop changing their tars. I think I associate more with someone's tar than with their actual name... im a visual person, especially when the visual is a female



I'm done changing. Relax homie.

Too late. I already view you as a completely different person.



Image


Image

User avatar
TripTrip
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:04 pm

Twinkle: Because you now have the cutest 'tar ITT.

I'm only going to law school for the law ladies, after all. 8)

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:05 pm

thanks for the freakin GIANT package of brochures, alma mater. all i really want is a lil bit of $ for cryin out loud

J90
Posts: 211
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:01 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby J90 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:07 pm

az21833 wrote:thanks for the freakin GIANT package of brochures, alma mater. all i really want is a lil bit of $ for cryin out loud


Not gonna happen until at least late March.

Don't worry about it and just take the brochures for now.

toothbrush
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby toothbrush » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:07 pm

TripTrip wrote:Twinkle: Because you now have the cutest 'tar ITT.

I'm only going to law school for the law ladies, after all. 8)

All people who use the internet look, and act, in real life, like they portray over the internet.

wtf grammar

User avatar
TripTrip
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TripTrip » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:09 pm

az21833 wrote:thanks for the freakin GIANT package of brochures, alma mater. all i really want is a lil bit of $ for cryin out loud

Columbia could start a new named tiny scholarship program.

Hamiltons for full, Butlers for half, and Schizers for $10.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:11 pm

i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something

User avatar
Lavitz
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lavitz » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:25 pm

az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something

The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.

toothbrush
Posts: 2388
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby toothbrush » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:26 pm

Lavitz wrote:
az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something

The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.

itz dat ivy preftige

User avatar
twinkletoes16
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby twinkletoes16 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:27 pm

Lavitz wrote:
az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something

The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.



probably why they don't have the best environmental law program.

User avatar
ph5354a
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ph5354a » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:28 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
az21833 wrote:i've never seen so much paper in my life. why dont they just send us a link or something

The same reason they don't e-mail decisions: Columbia hates trees.



probably why they don't have the best environmental law program.


probably why Marshall ends up working for Martin Short.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dietcoke1, lawschoolbound2017, studyingeveryday, texteach and 24 guests