Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
fruitoftheloom

Bronze
Posts: 391
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:38 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by fruitoftheloom » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:28 pm

Wormfather wrote:Hows this for a LOCI:
We both know what's going on here, you're YPing me, you want to see where I stand. I'll be honest with you, it's Hamilton or GTFO at this point. I anxiously await your decision.
Best LOCI ever written.

shakespeare

Bronze
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shakespeare » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:42 pm

Lavitz wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:What ur choosing Cornell? I thought we were doing NYU?!??

:?
Never said that. In fact, I think I said as much after I got my NYU offer.

I don't come from wealth and I'm rather debt-averse. Besides, I felt more comfortable at Cornell anyway. I think it's the right choice for me.

+1. Lavitz, I might join you there.

shakespeare

Bronze
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shakespeare » Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:48 pm

Sorry, guys, i went off TLS for about 2 weeks (in a sad attempt at getting a life...).

I've now forgotten pretty much everything about law school admissions:
held = okay
reserved = bad news
??

Anonymous4444

Silver
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Anonymous4444 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:02 pm

held is at best okay in my mind.... its not great either

User avatar
Audeamus

Bronze
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Audeamus » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:14 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:held is at best okay in my mind.... its not great either
I think whether held is considered good or not depends on your numbers/expectations going in. For instance, I was thrilled not to be auto-dinged and to still be in the running at all.

edit: Should also add that despite some claims on TLS that Columbia doesn't YP, I have a hard time believing that given the numbers of some of the helds. I think it's far more likely that there are two sub-populations of helds. YP people that will be admitted if they submit a LOCI and/or don't WD and people who they may have liked enough not to put on reserve but who may not have numbers that will help with medians. Whether those in the latter group get accepted will likely depend on whether CLS feels secure that they will be able to maintain medians regardless of admitting some more applicants with lower numbers. As always, take everything I say with a grain of salt. This is purely speculative.
Last edited by Audeamus on Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
02889

Bronze
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 02889 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:27 pm

Audeamus wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:held is at best okay in my mind.... its not great either
I think whether held is considered good or not depends on your numbers/expectations going in. For instance, I was thrilled not to be auto-dinged and to still be in the running at all.

edit: Should also add that despite some claims on TLS that Columbia doesn't YP, I have a hard time believing that given the numbers of some of the helds. I think it's far more likely that there are two sub-populations of helds. YP people that will be admitted if they submit a LOCI and/or don't WD and people who they may have liked enough not to put on reserve but who may not have numbers that will help with medians. Whether those in the latter group get accepted will likely depend on whether CLS feels secure that they will be able to maintain medians regardless of admitting some more applicants with lower numbers. As always, take everything I say with a grain of salt. This is purely speculative.
For those of us in the latter category, I wonder if a LOCI even matters at this point. They're more than likely going to put all of us on Reserve any day now.

User avatar
Audeamus

Bronze
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Audeamus » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:35 pm

02889 wrote:
Audeamus wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:held is at best okay in my mind.... its not great either
I think whether held is considered good or not depends on your numbers/expectations going in. For instance, I was thrilled not to be auto-dinged and to still be in the running at all.

edit: Should also add that despite some claims on TLS that Columbia doesn't YP, I have a hard time believing that given the numbers of some of the helds. I think it's far more likely that there are two sub-populations of helds. YP people that will be admitted if they submit a LOCI and/or don't WD and people who they may have liked enough not to put on reserve but who may not have numbers that will help with medians. Whether those in the latter group get accepted will likely depend on whether CLS feels secure that they will be able to maintain medians regardless of admitting some more applicants with lower numbers. As always, take everything I say with a grain of salt. This is purely speculative.
For those of us in the latter category, I wonder if a LOCI even matters at this point. They're more than likely going to put all of us on Reserve any day now.
Any day now seems a bit premature given that the hold email says we will hear by April 26.

User avatar
02889

Bronze
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 02889 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:42 pm

Audeamus wrote:
02889 wrote:
Audeamus wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:held is at best okay in my mind.... its not great either
I think whether held is considered good or not depends on your numbers/expectations going in. For instance, I was thrilled not to be auto-dinged and to still be in the running at all.

edit: Should also add that despite some claims on TLS that Columbia doesn't YP, I have a hard time believing that given the numbers of some of the helds. I think it's far more likely that there are two sub-populations of helds. YP people that will be admitted if they submit a LOCI and/or don't WD and people who they may have liked enough not to put on reserve but who may not have numbers that will help with medians. Whether those in the latter group get accepted will likely depend on whether CLS feels secure that they will be able to maintain medians regardless of admitting some more applicants with lower numbers. As always, take everything I say with a grain of salt. This is purely speculative.
For those of us in the latter category, I wonder if a LOCI even matters at this point. They're more than likely going to put all of us on Reserve any day now.
Any day now seems a bit premature given that the hold email says we will hear by April 26.
Maybe. But if the 3.8/178's of the world are already getting put on Reserve, I don't see why they would wait until April 26 for the 3.7/170. Either way, CLS has fallen off my radar, but I have no optimism.

User avatar
Audeamus

Bronze
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Audeamus » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm

02889 wrote: Maybe. But if the 3.8/178's of the world are already getting put on Reserve, I don't see why they would wait until April 26 for the 3.7/170. Either way, CLS has fallen off my radar, but I have no optimism.
Wait...did I totally miss something? People who were held in the past month have already been moved to reserve?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
02889

Bronze
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:21 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 02889 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:54 pm

Audeamus wrote:
02889 wrote: Maybe. But if the 3.8/178's of the world are already getting put on Reserve, I don't see why they would wait until April 26 for the 3.7/170. Either way, CLS has fallen off my radar, but I have no optimism.
Wait...did I totally miss something? People who were held in the past month have already been moved to reserve?
I don't think so. I believe all Reserves through now have skipped over the Hold phase. But my point is if they're already Reserving people with significantly higher numbers than mine, I don't see why they'd keep me on hold for another month and a half, unless it's because they just legitimately forgot about me until then.

User avatar
Audeamus

Bronze
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Audeamus » Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:58 pm

02889 wrote:
Audeamus wrote:
02889 wrote: Maybe. But if the 3.8/178's of the world are already getting put on Reserve, I don't see why they would wait until April 26 for the 3.7/170. Either way, CLS has fallen off my radar, but I have no optimism.
Wait...did I totally miss something? People who were held in the past month have already been moved to reserve?
I don't think so. I believe all Reserves through now have skipped over the Hold phase. But my point is if they're already Reserving people with significantly higher numbers than mine, I don't see why they'd keep me on hold for another month and a half, unless it's because they just legitimately forgot about me until then.
I guess that's one way to look at it. I'm choosing to be more optimistic.

eyfl

Bronze
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 3:28 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by eyfl » Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:47 pm

02889 wrote:
Audeamus wrote:
02889 wrote: Maybe. But if the 3.8/178's of the world are already getting put on Reserve, I don't see why they would wait until April 26 for the 3.7/170. Either way, CLS has fallen off my radar, but I have no optimism.
Wait...did I totally miss something? People who were held in the past month have already been moved to reserve?
I don't think so. I believe all Reserves through now have skipped over the Hold phase. But my point is if they're already Reserving people with significantly higher numbers than mine, I don't see why they'd keep me on hold for another month and a half, unless it's because they just legitimately forgot about me until then.
I think this means they liked you enough to think 'we should keep this guy, he's definitely in if the medians alow it'. For those with high numbers that went straight to reserve, there is definitely something that had a 'warning' sign. One can only guess what that could be though.

youcandoit

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:47 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by youcandoit » Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:22 pm

Longtime lurker here. I know the wait can get frustrating, but don't give up!

Complete 2/1
Accepted 3/12 via Admitted Student Handbook (priority mail)

3.5, 175 (retake)
Non-URM
Top 25, California
Average softs
Strong PS and Recs

My numbers are relatively unimpressive, so this should give those still waiting some hope. Best of luck to you all.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
ManOfTheMinute

Gold
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ManOfTheMinute » Fri Mar 15, 2013 3:34 pm

youcandoit wrote:Longtime lurker here. I know the wait can get frustrating, but don't give up!

Complete 2/1
Accepted 3/12 via Admitted Student Handbook (priority mail)

3.5, 175 (retake)
Non-URM
Top 25, California
Average softs
Strong PS and Recs

My numbers are relatively unimpressive, so this should give those still waiting some hope. Best of luck to you all.
Congrats!! CLS needs to make up its mind if its going to admit via email or snail mail. This bipolar shit has got to go

User avatar
wert3813

Silver
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by wert3813 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:09 pm

In today via email (???). It reads:

Please find a copy of your Columbia Law School decision letter attached to this email in PDF format. The original letter has also been placed in the mail.

That's it. 1/3 Sent 1/10 Complete.

User avatar
LSATSCORES2012

Silver
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by LSATSCORES2012 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:12 pm

wert3813 wrote:In today via email (???). It reads:

Please find a copy of your Columbia Law School decision letter attached to this email in PDF format. The original letter has also been placed in the mail.

That's it. 1/3 Sent 1/10 Complete.
There was no PDF attached?

worthymocka

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:42 pm

XXXXX

Post by worthymocka » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:20 pm

XXXXX
Last edited by worthymocka on Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
wert3813

Silver
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by wert3813 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:24 pm

LSATSCORES2012 wrote:
wert3813 wrote:In today via email (???). It reads:

Please find a copy of your Columbia Law School decision letter attached to this email in PDF format. The original letter has also been placed in the mail.

That's it. 1/3 Sent 1/10 Complete.
There was no PDF attached?
No there was. That would be rough. It just seemed very umm odd.

az21833

Silver
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by az21833 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:54 pm

CLS always moves to email closer to end of cycle guys. more time sensitive

subtle

Silver
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:43 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by subtle » Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:21 pm

az21833 wrote:CLS always moves to email closer to end of cycle guys. more time sensitive
This.

You'll get your VCE.

Anonymous4444

Silver
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Anonymous4444 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:37 pm

Ill take anything at this point...

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
joiedevivre18

New
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 7:33 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by joiedevivre18 » Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:49 pm

wert3813 wrote:In today via email (???). It reads:

Please find a copy of your Columbia Law School decision letter attached to this email in PDF format. The original letter has also been placed in the mail.

That's it. 1/3 Sent 1/10 Complete.
+1, sent and complete in December.

lollipop555

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:49 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by lollipop555 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:24 pm

have any ED deferrals been accepted?

User avatar
wert3813

Silver
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by wert3813 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:40 pm

Forgive me. Am I correct in thinking Columbia doesn't give non-Butler/Hamilton merit? That it is all need beyond that?

User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ph5354a » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:54 pm

wert3813 wrote:Forgive me. Am I correct in thinking Columbia doesn't give non-Butler/Hamilton merit? That it is all need beyond that?
What I've gleaned is that they call it need, but in reality it's a combo.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”