Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Sun Jan 27, 2013 5:59 pm

ph5354a wrote:
Crowing wrote:
ph5354a wrote:
Crowing wrote:CLS is actually quite a bit more selective than NYU, probably because their yield is better
I think NYU's larger class size is also a factor. Even if their yield were exactly the same, NYU would still have to accept more students in order to reach 450. Still, I'd guess that the number of students who get into NYU and don't get into CLS is pretty minimal.
Plugging in numbers around my range gets a 13% acceptance rate for CLS and 69% for NYU with pretty large sample sizes for both. NYU has the 2nd highest acceptance rate in the T-14 after GULC. CLS is much more difficult to get into.
That's funny...my chances are only 3% better at NYU than at CLS using law school predictor.
lsp is worthless. use mylsn since it has actual data.

User avatar
ph5354a

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ph5354a » Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:02 pm

Crowing wrote: lsp is worthless. use mylsn since it has actual data.
Interesting, good to know, thanks!

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by banjo » Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:14 pm

I wonder what happened to this kid: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/PhilosophyOrLaw.

And apparently http://lawschoolnumbers.com/countercouper/jd has no idea what happened at CLS. Random YP?

And what the hell happened here? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd

spyke123

Bronze
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spyke123 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:37 pm

banjo wrote:I wonder what happened to this kid: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/PhilosophyOrLaw.

And apparently http://lawschoolnumbers.com/countercouper/jd has no idea what happened at CLS. Random YP?

And what the hell happened here? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
I mean there are always anomalies right?

spyke123

Bronze
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spyke123 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:39 pm

banjo wrote:I wonder what happened to this kid: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/PhilosophyOrLaw.

And apparently http://lawschoolnumbers.com/countercouper/jd has no idea what happened at CLS. Random YP?

And what the hell happened here? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
I don't mean to be rude/bring up bad memories but I think your case with Harvard is pretty shocking too.. I never knew JS1->straight reject was a possibility.. scary

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
wert3813

Silver
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by wert3813 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:08 pm

banjo wrote:I wonder what happened to this kid: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/PhilosophyOrLaw.
Just a really average person behind the numbers. This outcome isn't so terrible as to make me say WTF.
banjo wrote:And apparently http://lawschoolnumbers.com/countercouper/jd has no idea what happened at CLS. Random YP?
Maybe. This one is hardest to explain.
banjo wrote: And what the hell happened here? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
I'll guess C & F

User avatar
banjo

Silver
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by banjo » Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:38 pm

spyke123 wrote:
banjo wrote:I wonder what happened to this kid: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/PhilosophyOrLaw.

And apparently http://lawschoolnumbers.com/countercouper/jd has no idea what happened at CLS. Random YP?

And what the hell happened here? http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
I don't mean to be rude/bring up bad memories but I think your case with Harvard is pretty shocking too.. I never knew JS1->straight reject was a possibility.. scary
That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.

je12345

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:51 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by je12345 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:18 pm

Got the letter today (was gone over the weekend, came Saturday). It was a white envelope with a blue folder inside with a letter. No nasty colors or anything..

spyke123

Bronze
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spyke123 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:25 pm

je12345 wrote:Got the letter today (was gone over the weekend, came Saturday). It was a white envelope with a blue folder inside with a letter. No nasty colors or anything..
congrats!

mind sharing where you live? thanks

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Lavitz » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:29 pm

je12345 wrote:Got the letter today (was gone over the weekend, came Saturday). It was a white envelope with a blue folder inside with a letter. No nasty colors or anything..
Congrats!
banjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd

And for the heck of it:
vertex wrote:Tomorrow's the big day! Everyone hold on to your hats!

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:32 pm

wtf somehow that guy got yp'd by gulc? lolwut

User avatar
roflmaozedong

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:56 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by roflmaozedong » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:33 pm

Lavitz wrote: Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd
Ditto, especially since, based upon his profile, I probably go to the same undergrad as he did and have similarly weak softs.

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:35 pm

Crowing wrote:wtf somehow that guy got yp'd by gulc? lolwut
:shock:

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:04 pm

Lavitz wrote:
And for the heck of it:
vertex wrote:Tomorrow's the big day! Everyone hold on to your hats!

this. tomorrow + tuesday = epic. after my 11-hour day tomorrow i am flying home to check the mail!

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:06 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
And for the heck of it:
vertex wrote:Tomorrow's the big day! Everyone hold on to your hats!

this. tomorrow + tuesday = epic. after my 11-hour day tomorrow i am flying home to check the mail!
I'm meeting a TLSer for dranks after work, so I'll definitely have to do the run home at lunch thing. I need to know whether to drink in celebration or sorrow.

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:08 pm

shntn wrote:
twinkletoes16 wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
And for the heck of it:
vertex wrote:Tomorrow's the big day! Everyone hold on to your hats!

this. tomorrow + tuesday = epic. after my 11-hour day tomorrow i am flying home to check the mail!
I'm meeting a TLSer for dranks after work, so I'll definitely have to do the run home at lunch thing. I need to know whether to drink in celebration or sorrow.

first image on my google search: --ImageRemoved--?

lol i probably won't even get in whatever yolo blah blah

bbsg

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:07 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bbsg » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:33 pm

Anyone still sitting at "completion pending" from early Jan submission? I'm at three weeks now.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


spyke123

Bronze
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by spyke123 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:41 pm

bbsg wrote:Anyone still sitting at "completion pending" from early Jan submission? I'm at three weeks now.
you should definitely give them a call.. I went complete within a day or two of submission..

housebro13

Bronze
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by housebro13 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:43 pm

wow after looking at last cycle's LSN page, it seems like Columbia sends out decisions daily-except Sundays-until May. thats good and bad news.

User avatar
Jpreece59

New
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:26 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Jpreece59 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:45 pm

housebro13 wrote:wow after looking at last cycle's LSN page, it seems like Columbia sends out decisions daily-except Sundays-until May. thats good and bad news.
what makes you say that could be bad news?

housebro13

Bronze
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by housebro13 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:48 pm

Jpreece59 wrote:
housebro13 wrote:wow after looking at last cycle's LSN page, it seems like Columbia sends out decisions daily-except Sundays-until May. thats good and bad news.
what makes you say that could be bad news?
could you imagine waiting week after week for your decision while seeing people on LSN and TLS get their decisions each day. it'd drive me insane!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
rehsalt

New
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:32 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by rehsalt » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:52 pm

Lavitz wrote:
banjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd
On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth

I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute

Gold
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ManOfTheMinute » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:54 pm

rehsalt wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
banjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd
On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth

I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
Sweet jesus. Carterth's cycle is a travesty. Her LORs must have said, "Do not admit this person to law school."

Edit: That, or adcoms just really despise music majors

User avatar
Teflon_Don

Bronze
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Teflon_Don » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:57 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
banjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd
On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth

I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
Sweet jesus. Carterth's cycle is a travesty. Her LORs must have said, "Do not admit this person to law school."

Haha +1
Edit: That, or adcoms just really despise music majors

housebro13

Bronze
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am

Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by housebro13 » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:58 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
rehsalt wrote:
Lavitz wrote:
banjo wrote:That's a fair observation, and probably the reason I've been thinking about some of these anomalies.
Then while we're on the subject, this profile has always been the most worrisome to me: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/wa810smart/jd
On the subject of people with shitty cycles, take a look at these:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth

I was hoping we get regulus to collect a spreadsheet of some of the worst cycles, just to give some perspective to people who are sure they're having epically bad cycles.
Sweet jesus. Carterth's cycle is a travesty. Her LORs must have said, "Do not admit this person to law school."
+1
Like I don't understand. what more could she have done with a 180 LSAT and 3.97 GPA ?

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”