Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:19 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
venus
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby venus » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:21 pm

kappycaft1, you're an awesome dude! Thanks so much for all the data! Chicago may be climbing higher on my top-schools list just so I can attend the same school as you :) Also, what they just said about the avatars.

bobloblaw7
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:40 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby bobloblaw7 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:57 pm

kappycaft1 wrote:
bobloblaw7 wrote:
Elahrairah wrote:
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:How long does it take to go under review? I'm sitting at complete as of November 2nd, but still not UR.


Same here, starting to get worried.

(Merry Christmas, everyone! :D)


I'm still sitting at complete as of 11/1, and am also getting worried. Glad to hear I'm not alone at least.

I am glad that you showed up here, bobloblaw7.... you've been messing up the data on LSN with your fake entries. You are currently showing up as having been wait-listed by Chicago, then being accepted with $30,000 in scholarships, and finally withdrawing. As a matter of fact, you are showing up as having withdrawn from every school you applied to for the 2012-2013 cycle. You also posted acceptance data for some schools before they even announced any acceptances this cycle.

In order to allow LSN to be an accurate tool for judging one's chances, I would appreciate it if you would remove the false data from your profile.

bobloblaw7 on LSN


Sorry, fixed and PM'd.

User avatar
Yukos
Posts: 1774
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Yukos » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:29 pm

Called the fuck out.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:42 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mdenis1
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Mdenis1 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:34 am

kappycaft1 wrote:
Mdenis1 wrote:We have similar stats, you give me hope! (Except 168 LSAT). Are you URM? Do you have more than normal softs?

kappycaft1 wrote:Because I no longer have any reason to remain anonymous now that my cycle is over, I've gone ahead and uploaded all of my information to LSN in case anyone is wondering what factors might contribute to a successful reverse-splitter cycle for applicants who are traditional, non-URMs with no military experience.


Oops. I hadn't seen that post. Thanks and congrats again!

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:39 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
danitt
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danitt » Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:03 am

kappycaft1 wrote:It is always comforting to know that no matter how well one does at the University of Chicago, there are other people there who will make all of one's accomplishments look relatively insignificant.

My personal arch nemesis even though he doesn't know it is Ronan Farrow. He's doing everything I want to do but at a younger age with more brilliance.

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby helix23 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:46 am

kappycaft1 wrote:It is always comforting to know that no matter how well one does at the University of Chicago, there are other people there who will make all of one's accomplishments look relatively insignificant.


I'd still crush him at beer pong

User avatar
pacifica
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby pacifica » Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:51 am

helix23 wrote:
kappycaft1 wrote:It is always comforting to know that no matter how well one does at the University of Chicago, there are other people there who will make all of one's accomplishments look relatively insignificant.


I'd still crush him at beer pong


--LinkRemoved--

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby helix23 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:56 am

pacifica wrote:
helix23 wrote:
kappycaft1 wrote:It is always comforting to know that no matter how well one does at the University of Chicago, there are other people there who will make all of one's accomplishments look relatively insignificant.


I'd still crush him at beer pong


--LinkRemoved--


Swagifica on the other hand has both. (talkin Y, big money young money)

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby helix23 » Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:59 am

Yukos wrote:Called the fuck out.


Change his name to The Regulator

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Fri Dec 28, 2012 2:50 pm

danitt wrote:
kappycaft1 wrote:It is always comforting to know that no matter how well one does at the University of Chicago, there are other people there who will make all of one's accomplishments look relatively insignificant.

My personal arch nemesis even though he doesn't know it is Ronan Farrow. He's doing everything I want to do but at a younger age with more brilliance.


"Happy father's day— or as they call it in my family, happy brother-in-law's day."
- Ronan Farrow

curious66
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby curious66 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:36 am

I had gotten a fee waiver (merit based) from Chicago to apply. Do you think they give any preference to folks that they proactively give out fee waivers to apply? RD candidate, went complete end of October, no word since then :(

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 2014 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:02 pm

curious66 wrote:I had gotten a fee waiver (merit based) from Chicago to apply. Do you think they give any preference to folks that they proactively give out fee waivers to apply? RD candidate, went complete end of October, no word since then :(

Only if you were targeted for a demographic (LSAT, GPA, Race, etc) that they give preference to. They probably give out hundreds of them, if not over a thousand, and they likely don't even see the list of names getting them.

curious66
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby curious66 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:08 pm

I do think know as in the status checker it shows the fee waived. However, not sure why I was targeted -- could have been either LSAT or GPA but it did not say specifically.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:52 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

curious66
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby curious66 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 5:13 pm

thanks for the info. My stats are similar to yours -- will just have to wait and see then I guess. Congrats on getting into U Chicago!

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Anonymous4444 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 6:59 pm

just curious i see a line in my status checker under application fee it says "class deposit" is this my being neurotic or is this a new item that wasnt there in the past? i dont recognize it? anyone else have this?

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:02 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous4444
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Anonymous4444 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:03 pm

kappycaft1 wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:just curious i see a line in my status checker under application fee it says "class deposit" is this my being neurotic or is this a new item that wasnt there in the past? i dont recognize it? anyone else have this?

I think that showed up for me after I got accepted.... are there any other RD applicants that are still waiting to hear back who have this on their status checker?



so im not crazy????

User avatar
danitt
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danitt » Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:05 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:
kappycaft1 wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:just curious i see a line in my status checker under application fee it says "class deposit" is this my being neurotic or is this a new item that wasnt there in the past? i dont recognize it? anyone else have this?

I think that showed up for me after I got accepted.... are there any other RD applicants that are still waiting to hear back who have this on their status checker?

so im not crazy????

I have it too and I'm not even close to being accepted. I think.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:06 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
tyler.durden
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby tyler.durden » Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:06 pm

kappycaft1 wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:just curious i see a line in my status checker under application fee it says "class deposit" is this my being neurotic or is this a new item that wasnt there in the past? i dont recognize it? anyone else have this?

I think that showed up for me after I got accepted.... are there any other RD applicants that are still waiting to hear back who have this on their status checker?


I'm RD and its on mine and i dont remember it being there before...

shntn
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shntn » Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:11 pm

tyler.durden wrote:
kappycaft1 wrote:
Anonymous4444 wrote:just curious i see a line in my status checker under application fee it says "class deposit" is this my being neurotic or is this a new item that wasnt there in the past? i dont recognize it? anyone else have this?

I think that showed up for me after I got accepted.... are there any other RD applicants that are still waiting to hear back who have this on their status checker?


I'm RD and its on mine and i dont remember it being there before...

Never paid attention before, but it's there. For some reason I don't think this is a new development, though.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Christinabruin, JazzyMac, Kaziende, Long shot hero and 6 guests