Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Bildungsroman » Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:41 pm

Congrats to all the new admits! :D

kfischm1
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby kfischm1 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:42 pm

Congrats to all the ED admits! :-) Hopefully some RD decisions will come out soon for those of us who applied early and have already interviewed.

And I second the idea of including if you interviewed or not in the acceptance post on here. I'm curious to know as well. :-)

User avatar
Rahviveh
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Rahviveh » Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:57 pm

kfischm1 wrote:Congrats to all the ED admits! :-) Hopefully some RD decisions will come out soon for those of us who applied early and have already interviewed.

And I second the idea of including if you interviewed or not in the acceptance post on here. I'm curious to know as well. :-)


I interviewed (thought my interview was awful too). Heavy high-LSAT splitter. I did write a Why Chicago? although it was kind of weak

User avatar
2014
Posts: 5831
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 2014 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:50 pm

Welcome 0Ls, I hope to meet some of you at ASW :)

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:24 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
justtrying
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby justtrying » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:25 pm

kappycaft1, I have finally found my numbers twin.

Admitted today! Yay :) Here's to showing how slaving over perfecting your apps can make up for an LSAT below the median.

No regrets on having slaved over 22 other apps...

Oh, and I interviewed.

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby sinfiery » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:27 pm

Bildungsroman wrote:Congrats to all the new admits! :D



kappycaft1 wrote:I was also accepted earlier today via email.
166 / 3.92 ED


You better not leave us.
:cry:

User avatar
venus
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby venus » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:30 pm

Congrats!!! kappycaft1, just because you got in doesn't mean you should stop posting graphs you know... :)

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:58 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Lavitz
Posts: 3098
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lavitz » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:16 pm

Ok, now that kappycaft1 has posted, I can finally congratulate the ED admits.

Congrats! :)

User avatar
Mad Hatter
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Mad Hatter » Thu Dec 20, 2012 9:51 pm

Bildungsroman wrote:Congrats to all the new admits! :D

User avatar
Smumps
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:37 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Smumps » Thu Dec 20, 2012 10:51 pm

congrats all! welcome to the family. I'll see you all soon at the hangge uppe!

User avatar
Mdenis1
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Mdenis1 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:04 pm

kappycaft1 wrote:I was also accepted earlier today via email.
166 / 3.92 ED


We have similar stats, you give me hope! (Except 168 LSAT). Are you URM? Do you have more than normal softs?

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:18 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
poichi
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:31 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby poichi » Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:44 pm

Mdenis1 wrote:
kappycaft1 wrote:I was also accepted earlier today via email.
166 / 3.92 ED


We have similar stats, you give me hope! (Except 168 LSAT). Are you URM? Do you have more than normal softs?


Reg seems like a pretty hoopy frood. I'm sure that came across in the applications in a more general way.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:43 am

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

shntn
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shntn » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:47 am

kappycaft1 wrote:
poichi wrote:Reg seems like a pretty hoopy frood. I'm sure that came across in the applications in a more general way.

I'm not sure what a hoopy frood is, but I'll assume it's something awesome. :D

Also.... I have a sort-of-dumb question for all you other ED admits, or anyone in general for that matter: How exactly do we begin withdrawing from the other schools we applied to? Can we just call them, or do we have to email them (or even write them letters)? Does anyone have a link to instructions about how to withdraw applications? (I basically just want to make sure that I tell them first.... almost like when you break up with someone, you don't want them to be the one that dumped you; you want to be "the dumper.")

E-mail is fine. I know someone who just BCC'ed them all on one e-mail and called it a day.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:47 am

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
tyler.durden
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby tyler.durden » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:29 am

Status date changed again today. So far my progression has been: Interview ->UR 12/6->UR 12/18->UR 12/21. Maybe RD decisions are coming soon??

BigZuck
Posts: 10872
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby BigZuck » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:39 am

tyler.durden wrote:Status date changed again today. So far my progression has been: Interview ->UR 12/6->UR 12/18->UR 12/21. Maybe RD decisions are coming soon??


Same minus the interview. Will be interesting if any RDers did not update today. Because if it's everyone then obviously there is nothing to read into it (which I'm sure there is not).

User avatar
danitt
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danitt » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:41 am

BigZuck wrote:
tyler.durden wrote:Status date changed again today. So far my progression has been: Interview ->UR 12/6->UR 12/18->UR 12/21. Maybe RD decisions are coming soon??


Same minus the interview. Will be interesting if any RDers did not update today. Because if it's everyone then obviously there is nothing to read into it (which I'm sure there is not).

Didn't someone post earlier in the thread that status changes with Chicago meant nothing so we shouldn't try to glean any kind of pattern? (Not that that's stopping me of course!)

User avatar
tyler.durden
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby tyler.durden » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:43 am

danitt wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
tyler.durden wrote:Status date changed again today. So far my progression has been: Interview ->UR 12/6->UR 12/18->UR 12/21. Maybe RD decisions are coming soon??


Same minus the interview. Will be interesting if any RDers did not update today. Because if it's everyone then obviously there is nothing to read into it (which I'm sure there is not).

Didn't someone post earlier in the thread that status changes with Chicago meant nothing so we shouldn't try to glean any kind of pattern? (Not that that's stopping me of course!)



Yeah I think I remember someone saying we shouldn't read into date changes, but I'm far to compulsive and high-strung at this point not to! haha

User avatar
danitt
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby danitt » Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:57 am

tyler.durden wrote:
danitt wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
tyler.durden wrote:Status date changed again today. So far my progression has been: Interview ->UR 12/6->UR 12/18->UR 12/21. Maybe RD decisions are coming soon??


Same minus the interview. Will be interesting if any RDers did not update today. Because if it's everyone then obviously there is nothing to read into it (which I'm sure there is not).

Didn't someone post earlier in the thread that status changes with Chicago meant nothing so we shouldn't try to glean any kind of pattern? (Not that that's stopping me of course!)



Yeah I think I remember someone saying we shouldn't read into date changes, but I'm far to compulsive and high-strung at this point not to! haha

For better or worse though it's nice to see movement. Unlike some other schools.

User avatar
tyler.durden
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby tyler.durden » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:00 pm

For better or worse though it's nice to see movement. Unlike some other schools.


No shit man, I'll take what I can get at this point. My nerves (and my fiance!) are ready for this cycle to be over. I've been a wreck lately...

User avatar
airbud
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:01 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby airbud » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:03 pm

RD here. Status did NOT update today. Still UR 12/17. Hoping it's bc they already made their decision to admit and my app needs no further review hah...




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”