Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
KingFish
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby KingFish » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:01 pm

hohenheim wrote:
hohenheim wrote:My guess is that the UR3 3/28 non-interview people are either directly admitted or get interview invites tomorrow. I've looked at their profiles and everyone is pretty solid.

The UR2 3/27 non-interview people that didn't update today seem to all be splitters, so I bet we're getting the WL :/


Hmm, I just went UR3. So who really knows what's going on...

Haha me too

User avatar
hohenheim
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:30 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby hohenheim » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:01 pm

hinakas wrote:Maybe it's turning into Michigan and is going to start updating status checkers everyday so that our speculating is rendered useless.


Until they start sending emails saying "What the what?" they haven't reached michigan status

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:04 pm

For these people who have been saying that you went UR3 - did this just happen or could it have happened this morning when it happened to me and several others?

KingFish
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby KingFish » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:05 pm

ManOfTheMinute wrote:For these people who have been saying that you went UR3 - did this just happen or could it have happened this morning when it happened to me and several others?

No, I checked like an hour ago or something and no update.

User avatar
you'rethemannowdawg
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby you'rethemannowdawg » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:27 pm

So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?

KingFish
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby KingFish » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:30 pm

you'rethemannowdawg wrote:So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?

UR3 today?

chadbrochill
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby chadbrochill » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:32 pm

.
Last edited by chadbrochill on Fri Apr 05, 2013 7:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
you'rethemannowdawg
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby you'rethemannowdawg » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:32 pm

KingFish wrote:
you'rethemannowdawg wrote:So what should I be obsessively checking tomorrow? Email or mailbox?

UR3 today?


You know it, brah.

User avatar
davee817
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby davee817 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:32 pm

Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table :evil:
Last edited by davee817 on Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

KingFish
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby KingFish » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:33 pm

davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table. :evil:

Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.

User avatar
davee817
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby davee817 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:38 pm

KingFish wrote:
davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table. :evil:

Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.


I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.

User avatar
cws277
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cws277 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:46 pm

davee817 wrote:
KingFish wrote:
davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table. :evil:

Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.


I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.


Is he a clinical faculty member there?

User avatar
davee817
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby davee817 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:49 pm

cws277 wrote:
davee817 wrote:
KingFish wrote:
davee817 wrote:Just received an email from law.admissions@uakron.edu.... I flipped the f**king table. :evil:

Quit flipping tables and go to Stanford.


I like Chicago though. Kanye West is my idol.


Is he a clinical faculty member there?


Yeah, but at the school of Public Policy.

User avatar
cws277
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cws277 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:05 pm

So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.

User avatar
davee817
Posts: 66
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby davee817 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:12 pm

cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.


They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...

User avatar
Audeamus
Posts: 430
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Audeamus » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:28 pm

davee817 wrote:
cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.


They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...


they're on central time, so it's not really that late.

User avatar
cws277
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cws277 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:33 pm

davee817 wrote:
cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.


They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...

After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9652
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby jbagelboy » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:35 pm

cws277 wrote:
davee817 wrote:
cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.


They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...

After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.


by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miami

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:37 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
cws277 wrote:
davee817 wrote:
cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.


They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...

After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.


by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miami


No city has a higher percentage of fair-weather sports fans than LA.

User avatar
cws277
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cws277 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:39 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
cws277 wrote:
davee817 wrote:
cws277 wrote:So after posting earlier about my no date change, my date just moved to today within the last hour or so. Interviewed in the last two weeks. UR 3/1.


They're staying at the office later than usual. Hmm...

After last night's Bulls game, I am 100% sold on Chicago. No way I'd even pick Harvard or Stanford if they let me in: Bulls > Warriors > Celts.


by this metric, i would stay in LA or move to miami

It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.

User avatar
you'rethemannowdawg
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby you'rethemannowdawg » Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:27 pm

Does Chicago notify by email?

edamame
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby edamame » Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:28 pm

you'rethemannowdawg wrote:Does Chicago notify by email?


Yes

User avatar
TripTrip
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TripTrip » Thu Mar 28, 2013 9:41 pm

cws277 wrote:It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.

Or Hawaii.

We need to think seriously about sending all the top-indexed TLSers to schools in warmer climates to artificially boost their USNWR rankings. I bet we could help UCLA jump GULC.

User avatar
cws277
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cws277 » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:51 pm

TripTrip wrote:
cws277 wrote:It truly is the great tragedy of the legal market that there are no T14 schools in Miami.

Or Hawaii.

We need to think seriously about sending all the top-indexed TLSers to schools in warmer climates to artificially boost their USNWR rankings. I bet we could help UCLA jump GULC.

Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.

User avatar
TripTrip
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby TripTrip » Thu Mar 28, 2013 10:55 pm

cws277 wrote:Absolutely. Problem is that would require some temporary self-sacrifice for the greater good on the part of those TLSers. From my limited time here, that seems unlikely.

"Will you, mighty TLSer with great future potential, forgo your hopes and dreams so that future high scorers on the LSAT might have a better opportunity to spend three years in a warm climate?"




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aaron1621, bleakchimera2, ellielaw, hip to be Square, playersball, studyingeveryday and 26 guests