Page 79 of 130

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:02 pm
by jbagelboy
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:54 pm
by Spritzpiggy
RUBY!!!!! Oh my goodness I'm freaking out!!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:55 pm
by broadstreet11
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision


Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:34 pm
by spicyyoda17
broadstreet11 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision


Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?


Waves

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:26 pm
by jbagelboy
interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:32 pm
by jbagelboy
jbagelboy wrote:interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!


lol, just realized my skype name is identical to my TLS screen name. so much for anonymity.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:35 pm
by MacB
spicyyoda17 wrote:
broadstreet11 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision


Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?


Waves


Congrats!

I would like waves of Rubies. :)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:38 pm
by wisteria
Invitation to interview received. Complete 12/5, UR 2/11.

I tried to schedule the first time slot I could see which was on 2/25. In a blink of eye all slots on 2/25 and 2/26 were gone. :shock: Managed to schedule one 2/27. Thank god the invite came in time, because I'm traveling abroad on 2/28! :shock:

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:44 pm
by Crowing
jbagelboy wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!


lol, just realized my skype name is identical to my TLS screen name. so much for anonymity.


I actually made a new Skype account specifically for the purposes of this interview.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:14 pm
by sinfiery
wisteria wrote:Invitation to interview received. Complete 12/5, UR 2/11.

+1

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:35 pm
by spyder11
Just got invited to interview :)

I didn't know UChicago interviewed but I'm glad I got my Harvard interview over with. Should be better prepared for this one...

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:40 pm
by shntn
Oh they're Rubying people now? I should pay more attention to these threads.

On second thought, no, I shouldn't. Ignorance is bliss.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:41 pm
by WalkingPlato
Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:44 pm
by mambar
.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:46 pm
by WalkingPlato
mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign. :)


Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:48 pm
by Crowing
WalkingPlato wrote:
mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign. :)


Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.


It's in the OP. We're suffering from some underreporting of post-interview WLs but it sill looks like a good sign overall to get an invite, even though Chicago tries to claim it doesn't imply anything.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:50 pm
by mambar
.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:52 pm
by Crowing
mambar wrote:Yep. But no denials!


Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:54 pm
by mambar
.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:30 pm
by postard
Invited/Set up my interview today. Stoked!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:08 am
by Jaqen
postard wrote:Invited/Set up my interview today. Stoked!


If you haven't seen this thread, check it out: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=200887

It was a big help for my interview. <3 kappycaft1 for making it, and everyone who contributed.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:40 pm
by vzapana
Jaqen wrote:If you haven't seen this thread, check it out: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=200887

It was a big help for my interview. <3 kappycaft1 for making it, and everyone who contributed.


+1

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:20 pm
by ssanonymous
Invites out? Congrats guys! Guess this means I got rejected. No surprises there. Make it quick, Chicago!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:32 pm
by reallysearch
Crowing wrote:
mambar wrote:Yep. But no denials!


Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.


I know someone who was interviewed and rejected.... I guess it's just the self-reporting nature of the spreadsheet has made the result quite biased. But overall it's quite a positive sign to be invited.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:28 pm
by ht2988
ssanonymous wrote:Invites out? Congrats guys! Guess this means I got rejected. No surprises there. Make it quick, Chicago!


+1. complete 12/5, UR 1/31 and 2/11 and no interview invite for me. wasn't expecting to get in here, but...