Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9647
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby jbagelboy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:02 pm

vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision

User avatar
Spritzpiggy
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Spritzpiggy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:54 pm

RUBY!!!!! Oh my goodness I'm freaking out!!

User avatar
broadstreet11
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby broadstreet11 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:55 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision


Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?

User avatar
spicyyoda17
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby spicyyoda17 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:34 pm

broadstreet11 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision


Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?


Waves

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9647
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby jbagelboy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:26 pm

interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9647
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby jbagelboy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:32 pm

jbagelboy wrote:interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!


lol, just realized my skype name is identical to my TLS screen name. so much for anonymity.

MacB
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby MacB » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:35 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
broadstreet11 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks


holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision


Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?


Waves


Congrats!

I would like waves of Rubies. :)

wisteria
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wisteria » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:38 pm

Invitation to interview received. Complete 12/5, UR 2/11.

I tried to schedule the first time slot I could see which was on 2/25. In a blink of eye all slots on 2/25 and 2/26 were gone. :shock: Managed to schedule one 2/27. Thank god the invite came in time, because I'm traveling abroad on 2/28! :shock:

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:44 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!


lol, just realized my skype name is identical to my TLS screen name. so much for anonymity.


I actually made a new Skype account specifically for the purposes of this interview.

User avatar
sinfiery
Posts: 3308
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby sinfiery » Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:14 pm

wisteria wrote:Invitation to interview received. Complete 12/5, UR 2/11.

+1

spyder11
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby spyder11 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:35 pm

Just got invited to interview :)

I didn't know UChicago interviewed but I'm glad I got my Harvard interview over with. Should be better prepared for this one...
Last edited by spyder11 on Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

shntn
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shntn » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:40 pm

Oh they're Rubying people now? I should pay more attention to these threads.

On second thought, no, I shouldn't. Ignorance is bliss.

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby WalkingPlato » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:41 pm

Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

mambar
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby mambar » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:44 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign. :)

WalkingPlato
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby WalkingPlato » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:46 pm

mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign. :)


Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:48 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:
mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign. :)


Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.


It's in the OP. We're suffering from some underreporting of post-interview WLs but it sill looks like a good sign overall to get an invite, even though Chicago tries to claim it doesn't imply anything.

mambar
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby mambar » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:50 pm

Crowing wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:
mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign. :)


Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.


It's in the OP. We're suffering from some underreporting of post-interview WLs but it sill looks like a good sign overall to get an invite, even though Chicago tries to claim it doesn't imply anything.

Yep. But no denials!

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:52 pm

mambar wrote:Yep. But no denials!


Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.

mambar
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:11 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby mambar » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:54 pm

Crowing wrote:
mambar wrote:Yep. But no denials!


Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.

haha. I guess people could be very embarrassed... even though it's anonymous... Or Chicago is lying :roll:

User avatar
postard
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby postard » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:30 pm

Invited/Set up my interview today. Stoked!

User avatar
Jaqen
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Jaqen » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:08 am

postard wrote:Invited/Set up my interview today. Stoked!


If you haven't seen this thread, check it out: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=200887

It was a big help for my interview. <3 kappycaft1 for making it, and everyone who contributed.

vzapana
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby vzapana » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:40 pm

Jaqen wrote:If you haven't seen this thread, check it out: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=200887

It was a big help for my interview. <3 kappycaft1 for making it, and everyone who contributed.


+1

User avatar
ssanonymous
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:27 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ssanonymous » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:20 pm

Invites out? Congrats guys! Guess this means I got rejected. No surprises there. Make it quick, Chicago!

User avatar
reallysearch
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby reallysearch » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:32 pm

Crowing wrote:
mambar wrote:Yep. But no denials!


Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.


I know someone who was interviewed and rejected.... I guess it's just the self-reporting nature of the spreadsheet has made the result quite biased. But overall it's quite a positive sign to be invited.

ht2988
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby ht2988 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:28 pm

ssanonymous wrote:Invites out? Congrats guys! Guess this means I got rejected. No surprises there. Make it quick, Chicago!


+1. complete 12/5, UR 1/31 and 2/11 and no interview invite for me. wasn't expecting to get in here, but...




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”