Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
WaitingandHopeful
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby WaitingandHopeful » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:33 pm

GoldenGriffin wrote:Submitted back in November, still haven't gone under review yet.


Same. I imagine there will be a wave of new URs on Monday or Tuesday now that this batch is out.

User avatar
Rahviveh
Posts: 2271
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Rahviveh » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:44 pm

Congrats everyone! Feel free to join us in the c/o 2016 thread

viewtopic.php?f=33&t=200475

User avatar
Nala7892
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:33 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Nala7892 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:29 pm

I'm in too! Applied 11/2, interview 2/13! 170/3.76. I'm so excited right now

sokomofo
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby sokomofo » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:45 pm

.
Last edited by sokomofo on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Dr. Gaius Baltar
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Dr. Gaius Baltar » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:52 pm

No decision. Not that I'm sour-grapesing or anything, it's just that I've never been to Chicago and only have what I hear on NPR to go off. Are people liable to get shot in Hyde Park?

grapefruits
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby grapefruits » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:09 am

Ironically they gave un-promised decisions, but not the pseudo-promised twitter update. Anyhow, I have nothing to complain about, but think about all the poor, isolated, TLSless masses!

User avatar
amsong
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby amsong » Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:31 am

Waitlisted, no interview. I'm not all that surprised. If anything, I'm happy I wasn't dinged.

shakespeare
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shakespeare » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:24 am

In via email.

Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.

Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.

PM for details.

Dr. Gaius Baltar
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Dr. Gaius Baltar » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:57 am

shakespeare wrote:In via email.

Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.

Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.

PM for details.


Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.

I thought mine was great too.

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:59 am

Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:
shakespeare wrote:In via email.

Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.

Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.

PM for details.


Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.

I thought mine was great too.


Well some people who had Dean Perry didn't seem to enjoy the experience too much.

As for people who had... the other person... well... :oops:

MacB
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby MacB » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:05 am

I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.


...wait, not LOVED loved. Don't judge me.

User avatar
Jaqen
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Jaqen » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:08 am

MacB wrote:I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.


I was expecting ice cold death stares, but nah. It was pleasant.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby risa » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:39 am

Jaqen wrote:
MacB wrote:I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.


I was expecting ice cold death stares, but nah. It was pleasant.

ditto.

also, I owe someone a snickerdoodle.

User avatar
robot_socrates
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby robot_socrates » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:43 am

Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:No decision. Not that I'm sour-grapesing or anything, it's just that I've never been to Chicago and only have what I hear on NPR to go off. Are people liable to get shot in Hyde Park?


I mean, if you act stupidly enough, you're liable to get shot anywhere in Chicago. But generally Hyde Park is fine. Source: I'm from Chicago.

User avatar
honeybadger12
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby honeybadger12 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:02 am

Waitlisted yesterday. Weird thing is I withdrew my app three weeks ago and their office confirmed. Is this common? It feels like they're trying to manipulate their acceptance rate...

Gisney
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Gisney » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:53 am

Waitlisted yesterday. Surprised because I expected a ding. Under 25% GPA and at median LSAT.

vzapana
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby vzapana » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:50 am

honeybadger12 wrote:Waitlisted yesterday. Weird thing is I withdrew my app three weeks ago and their office confirmed. Is this common? It feels like they're trying to manipulate their acceptance rate...


you might want to re-confirm your withdrawal - you don't run into any problems in the spring

vzapana
Posts: 530
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby vzapana » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:51 am

ChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out

Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:

Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq

Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0


Also this

User avatar
reallysearch
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby reallysearch » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:04 pm

vzapana wrote:
ChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out

Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:

Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq

Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0


Also this


I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)

But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...

User avatar
hhockberger
Posts: 174
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby hhockberger » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:10 pm

Dinged yesterday, as expected. Congrats admits!!

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:10 pm

reallysearch wrote:
vzapana wrote:
ChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out

Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:

Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq

Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0


Also this


I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)

But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...


Yeah I'm sure even WLs are underreported because there were people ITT who reported WL after interview yesterday but there are none on the spreadsheet.

talesofyore
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby talesofyore » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:17 pm

reallysearch wrote:
vzapana wrote:
ChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out

Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:

Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq

Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0


Also this


I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)

But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...


It's still kind of useful if you judge the amount of people who answered 'accepted' vs. the original 'invited to interview' spreadsheet.

04102014
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 04102014 » Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:46 pm

I want my UR

shakespeare
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shakespeare » Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:46 am

Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:
shakespeare wrote:In via email.

Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.

Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.

PM for details.


Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.

I thought mine was great too.



Sry I was refering to much earlier comments. Ppl had said they felt the interviewer was bored and gave one word answers to their questions.

Ruthie
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Ruthie » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:39 am

I applied late(1/15) and haven't heard anything, though my application is complete. Did those who were rejected get an email? Or just see it on status checker? Mine in probably coming today:(




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”