Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
robot_socrates
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby robot_socrates » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:44 pm

JamesDean1955 wrote:They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.

Oops.


:lol: , thanks for making me laugh during these stressful times.

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:44 pm

JamesDean1955 wrote:They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.

Oops.


BETTER NOT it's pretty easy to out me from my TLS body of work. Gonna be awkward on campus..........

User avatar
robot_socrates
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby robot_socrates » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:45 pm

Teflon_Don wrote:Alright so I just realized my emails are in lowercase.. All my other apps are uppercase. Anyone else's like this or could it mean possible decision rendered like stanford?


My primary email is uppercase for Chicago, and given that I'm at UR4, I'm sure they have a decision rendered on me. Maybe your undercase could mean something about the nature of the decision, but who knows.

User avatar
callmemaybe84
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby callmemaybe84 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:48 pm

robot_socrates wrote:
Teflon_Don wrote:Alright so I just realized my emails are in lowercase.. All my other apps are uppercase. Anyone else's like this or could it mean possible decision rendered like stanford?


My primary email is uppercase for Chicago, and given that I'm at UR4, I'm sure they have a decision rendered on me. Maybe your undercase could mean something about the nature of the decision, but who knows.


I'm uppercase--just to give another data point for the decisions about to come.

MacB
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby MacB » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:50 pm

How many of you are refreshing Chicago's twitter feed every two to three minutes... be honest.



...sheepishly raises his hand...

User avatar
robot_socrates
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby robot_socrates » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:52 pm

MacB wrote:How many of you are refreshing Chicago's twitter feed every two to three minutes... be honest.



...sheepishly raises his hand...


I'm surprised you can make it 2-3 minutes.

User avatar
NoodleyOne
Posts: 2358
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby NoodleyOne » Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:52 pm

Crowing wrote:
JamesDean1955 wrote:They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.

Oops.


BETTER NOT it's pretty easy to out me from my TLS body of work. Gonna be awkward on campus..........

I got no shame. Hell, maybe it'll give me an edge.

User avatar
venus
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby venus » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:01 pm

I feel like I just wasted a whole day refreshing pages for nothing :( Was really hoping today would be the day.

User avatar
robot_socrates
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby robot_socrates » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:03 pm

venus wrote:I feel like I just wasted a whole day refreshing pages for nothing :( Was really hoping today would be the day.


Same. They did promise a twitter update no matter what, so I haven't quite given up hope yet. But it looks bad.

iteachtenthgrade
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby iteachtenthgrade » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:04 pm

a) This is torture

b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?

c) I must be on edge

grapefruits
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby grapefruits » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:05 pm

At the very least, we can be sure they are still in the office. While they didn't promise decisions, they (kind of) promised an update, which they are yet to deliver on. I'm optimistic about decisions still.

Volforlife
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Volforlife » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:08 pm

iteachtenthgrade wrote:b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?


+1

MacB
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby MacB » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:08 pm

If they don't follow through on this twitter update, I'm withdrawing. THAT'S IT.



:P

User avatar
callmemaybe84
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby callmemaybe84 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:09 pm

grapefruits wrote:At the very least, we can be sure they are still in the office. While they didn't promise decisions, they (kind of) promised an update, which they are yet to deliver on. I'm optimistic about decisions still.


Agree. Longer we go without twitter update, the more i'm certain decisions are coming in the next hour. But after that, we can move on with our lives for a few days

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:09 pm

Volforlife wrote:
iteachtenthgrade wrote:b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?


+1


The ratio of views/replies in that thread is cray compared to the other schools.

grapefruits
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby grapefruits » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:12 pm

Crowing wrote:
Volforlife wrote:
iteachtenthgrade wrote:b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?


+1


The ratio of views/replies in that thread is cray compared to the other schools.


~6%, when most other threads look to be around 2%.

User avatar
venus
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby venus » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:14 pm

grapefruits wrote:
Crowing wrote:
Volforlife wrote:
iteachtenthgrade wrote:b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?


+1


The ratio of views/replies in that thread is cray compared to the other schools.


~6%, when most other threads look to be around 2%.

Haha I had never been on that thread but just realized what you guys were talking about.

User avatar
reallysearch
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby reallysearch » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:15 pm

Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...

and good luck everyone!

wisteria
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby wisteria » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:17 pm

For those who went UR on 2/11 or later, anyone received interview invites yet? It seems that many who went UR 2/4 got interview invites on 2/8.

iteachtenthgrade
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby iteachtenthgrade » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:17 pm

reallysearch wrote:Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...

and good luck everyone!


5pm where?

User avatar
Teflon_Don
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Teflon_Don » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:21 pm

Really surprised at the lack of a Twitter update..

User avatar
JamesDean1955
Posts: 744
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby JamesDean1955 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:21 pm

iteachtenthgrade wrote:
reallysearch wrote:Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...

and good luck everyone!


5pm where?


Hopefully PST, then that would actually give me some hope lol.

User avatar
venus
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby venus » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:21 pm

iteachtenthgrade wrote:
reallysearch wrote:Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...

and good luck everyone!


5pm where?

Please, say west coast!

User avatar
LSATSCORES2012
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby LSATSCORES2012 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:24 pm

IN!!!!!

Edited to add:

170/3.86, submitted 9/15, complete 11/2 (held for Oct. LSAT)

had two major typos on my resume

I thought the interview went poorly because my interviewer didn't seem to like me, but had I not been able to see them then I would have thought it went pretty well.

Super excited - right now, I think Chicago is my top choice!
Last edited by LSATSCORES2012 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Teflon_Don
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Teflon_Don » Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:24 pm

In!!!!




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests