Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
fallingup
Posts: 481
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby fallingup » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:16 pm

UChicagoLawAdmission ‏@UChicagoLawApps

We're finalizing a group of decisions. Hoping to get them out tomorrow, but no promises. We will update Twitter tomorrow either way.

User avatar
clouded.memory
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby clouded.memory » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:18 pm

fallingup wrote:UChicagoLawAdmission ‏@UChicagoLawApps

We're finalizing a group of decisions. Hoping to get them out tomorrow, but no promises. We will update Twitter tomorrow either way.

And it officially begins...

mcb0902
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:11 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby mcb0902 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:18 pm

Haha, ohhhhhh no.
Last edited by mcb0902 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
callmemaybe84
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby callmemaybe84 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:21 pm

mcb0902 wrote:Haha, ohhhhhh no.


Be positive. We don't have to worry about an email coming today! At least we can relax now and wait for tomorrow.

User avatar
LSATSCORES2012
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby LSATSCORES2012 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:21 pm

Ohh boooy.

I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...

We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...

Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.

User avatar
learntolift
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby learntolift » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:22 pm

well i went UR yesterday but that's because my interview was also yesterday i believe?

mcb0902
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:11 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby mcb0902 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:24 pm

callmemaybe84 wrote:
mcb0902 wrote:Haha, ohhhhhh no.


Be positive. We don't have to worry about an email coming today! At least we can relax now and wait for tomorrow.



In an ideal world, I could follow your lead and relax for the day. Sadly in my world, I have just shed the relatively minor stress of wondering if an email might come today and replaced it with the MUCH larger stress of knowing that an email is coming tomorrow with an unknown decision. :|

I need to chill, I know, haha.

User avatar
callmemaybe84
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby callmemaybe84 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:25 pm

LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Ohh boooy.

I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...

We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...

Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.


I'm above both, and was updated today. My guess is that updated today = decision tomorrow. No more significance than that. Y'all are over-thinking this.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby risa » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:26 pm

Would be crazy if I actually saw a decision tomorrow, but I won't hold my breath. My interview was only yesterday. (I updated yesterday after my interview and again today)

iteachtenthgrade
Posts: 131
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby iteachtenthgrade » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:27 pm

callmemaybe84 wrote:
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Ohh boooy.

I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...

We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...

Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.


I'm above both, and was updated today. My guess is that updated today = decision tomorrow. No more significance than that. Y'all are over-thinking this.


+1

04102014
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 04102014 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:27 pm

I'm not even UR yet and this is all so exciting.

User avatar
cwid1391
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby cwid1391 » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:28 pm

UR 1/31, but no word since. Gimme dat ding, UC.

User avatar
trojandave
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby trojandave » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:31 pm

risa wrote:Would be crazy if I actually saw a decision tomorrow, but I won't hold my breath. My interview was only yesterday. (I updated yesterday after my interview and again today)


After my interview I had 2 updates also then nothing till decision time. You could be in the mix!

Lurkington
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:18 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lurkington » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:35 pm

.
Last edited by Lurkington on Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JXander
Posts: 960
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby JXander » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:36 pm

callmemaybe84 wrote:Y'all are over-thinking this.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby risa » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:37 pm

Lurkington wrote:
risa wrote:Would be crazy if I actually saw a decision tomorrow, but I won't hold my breath. My interview was only yesterday. (I updated yesterday after my interview and again today)



Bet you a cookie you get a decision tomorrow

Snickerdoodle?

User avatar
Spritzpiggy
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Spritzpiggy » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:38 pm

Had my interview today so I think its safe to assume I won't be in the next batch...

BUT I did learn something interesting during the interview. Apparently the interviewer ONLY sees your resume before the interview and doesn't know the other aspects of your application. So if you're discussing something that relates to your PS make sure to give them a little background.

User avatar
risa
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby risa » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:39 pm

Spritzpiggy wrote:Had my interview today so I think its safe to assume I won't be in the next batch...

BUT I did learn something interesting during the interview. Apparently the interviewer ONLY sees your resume before the interview and doesn't know the other aspects of your application. So if you're discussing something that relates to your PS make sure to give them a little background.

That definitely isn't true all the time. Dean Perry made a very direct reference to my diversity statement during my interview. She also told me my resume "screams law" so obviously she saw that too.

Lurkington
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:18 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Lurkington » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:41 pm

.
Last edited by Lurkington on Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
DaRascal
Posts: 1854
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby DaRascal » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:53 pm

Another update today. I think that's the 3rd one. Maybe Chicago wants to show me some love on V-Day... probably not though... definitely not lol... :P

User avatar
venus
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby venus » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:57 pm

Date change. Interviewed at the end of January. Tomorrow is going to be a very unproductive day for me. Planning on refreshing TLS, the status checker, my inbox and Twitter all day.

User avatar
SteelPenguin
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby SteelPenguin » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:59 pm

clouded.memory wrote:
SteelPenguin wrote:
robot_socrates wrote:Status change for me too. This is UR 4 for me (1/9, interview 1/29, UR 1/29, 1/30, now today). I'm freaking out.


That's crazy. I've never heard of 4 URs before. At least you'll probably get an answer soon, right?

I have also had 4 URs, but I wasn't under the impression that it was unusual.


Sorry you're probably right. I haven't been paying much attention to this thread because I'm such a long shot. I just hadn't seen 4 URs at other schools I've been looking at.

whereskyle
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby whereskyle » Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:01 pm

We're all getting in!

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:06 pm

This is exciting. Pulling for y'all!

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:07 pm

JamesDean1955 wrote:Crowing what happened to the bad-ass tar. Drastic tar change you pulled there.


You mean the Rise Against logo? Apparently some megaposter around here used that for his tar for a while so it was getting people confused.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: crimsonknight, Exabot [Bot], fancyfluter22, JosefK, jtawil, Lmorina126, notsolawful, oliviaj_j, Yahoo [Bot] and 25 guests