Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
User avatar
EttaJ
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:41 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby EttaJ » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:32 pm

Jaqen wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes... Waitlisted.


What.

:(


Huh?

User avatar
Vincent
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 6:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Vincent » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:33 pm

Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes...



.....





..........









..............










Waitlisted.


I do not understand. WTF?

User avatar
helix23
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby helix23 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:36 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
Jaqen wrote:
Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes... Waitlisted.


What.

:(


I'm convinced that w/ people like Lavitz, all it takes is one sincere LOCI and boom, they can go where they want.

This is YP at its best.

But Lavitz, in all seriousness, we're all pulling for you and hope that ultimately you end up at your #1 choice and you will be all the more happy about it.


this is credited

User avatar
trojandave
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby trojandave » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:37 pm

Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes...


Waitlisted.


What?! I'm starting to think Lav has us all on a 3 month-long epic troll. Nothing else makes sense

User avatar
elterrible78
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:09 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby elterrible78 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:38 pm

Lavitz wrote:Ok everyone, here it comes...



.....





..........









..............










Waitlisted.


One of the two worst pieces of news I have heard today. I am really, really sorry to hear this.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:39 pm

hey guys, out of the RD admits what % of you interviewed. Same question for WL. Same question for rejections.

thank you all and congratulations (esp. yoda, trombaltana, annonymous, eichenchorn and my other #s twins, you guys are my fam)

one_by_one
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby one_by_one » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:40 pm

.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby 20141023 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:41 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:42 pm

also is it just me or do the #s seem a little below UChi's typical cycle? this is purely anecdotal but i think we might be seeing the first of the 2013 slight, SLIGHT bump

User avatar
NoodleyOne
Posts: 2358
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby NoodleyOne » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:43 pm

Lavitz, I have to ask...

Have you ever been convicted of manslaughter? I can't think of any other reason.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:44 pm

lavitz maybe re-read your p/s or d/s?

User avatar
applemaroon
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby applemaroon » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:55 pm

.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

shntn
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shntn » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:55 pm

applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?

<-- exception

User avatar
Jaqen
Posts: 949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Jaqen » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:58 pm

applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?


They're definitely a GPA-heavy school. For the C/O 2015, the median was 3.9 and the 75th was 3.96.

User avatar
applemaroon
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby applemaroon » Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:59 pm

.
Last edited by applemaroon on Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:03 pm

on the flip side A LOT of high 160s getting the early nod

shntn
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby shntn » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:03 pm

Jaqen wrote:
applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?


They're definitely a GPA-heavy school. For the C/O 2015, the median was 3.9 and the 75th was 3.96.

:shock: :shock:

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:07 pm

applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?


Compared to CLS and NYU this is definitely true. It doesn't look like many traditional splitters were admitted today.

User avatar
applemaroon
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby applemaroon » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:11 pm

.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

az21833
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby az21833 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:13 pm

applemaroon wrote:
Crowing wrote:
applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?


Compared to CLS and NYU this is definitely true. It doesn't look like many traditional splitters were admitted today.



Based on today's acceptances, I feel like my chances are slim :cry:


maybe so but your chances at hls and cls are tremendous so no reason for concern my fair maiden

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:14 pm

applemaroon wrote:
Crowing wrote:
applemaroon wrote:So.....based on all the acceptance and WL folks' numbers, seems like UChi greatly favors high GPA over LSAT. What do you guys think?


Compared to CLS and NYU this is definitely true. It doesn't look like many traditional splitters were admitted today.



Based on today's acceptances, I feel like my chances are slim :cry:


Your numbers look pretty damn good to me

User avatar
applemaroon
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby applemaroon » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:15 pm

.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:18 pm

Maybe, but I got in with a 3.46 so a 3.7 sounds pretty great.

User avatar
applemaroon
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby applemaroon » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:19 pm

.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

curious66
Posts: 381
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 6:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Postby curious66 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:20 pm

Crowing wrote:Maybe, but I got in with a 3.46 so a 3.7 sounds pretty great.


I got WL with a 3.82 and 168.. but don't have ties to the area, so maybe I need to convince them I would come if accepted via the LOCI etc.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: lillawyer2, mm2368, Solidfood, TudoBem and 13 guests