Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- tyler.durden
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Status date just changed. I was UR 12/6 (right after my interview) and it updated to UR 12/18 just now
- RSterling
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same here. Had my interview on Friday (12/14), updated to UR shortly after.tyler.durden wrote:Status date just changed. I was UR 12/6 (right after my interview) and it updated to UR 12/18 just now
- RSterling
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also interested to know: does Chicago give out its merit aid immediately upon acceptance, or does it come later?
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
seems to come later. roughly about a month laterRSterling wrote:Also interested to know: does Chicago give out its merit aid immediately upon acceptance, or does it come later?
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My status also updated today. Originally under review back in November. Never interviewed, bad numbers. Sorry bros (unless everyone updated today).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.BigZuck wrote:My status also updated today. Originally under review back in November. Never interviewed, bad numbers. Sorry bros (unless everyone updated today).
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
RD. Didn't know that, I take back my apology. You bros are good.djwjddl wrote:Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.BigZuck wrote:My status also updated today. Originally under review back in November. Never interviewed, bad numbers. Sorry bros (unless everyone updated today).
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Samesies.tyler.durden wrote:Status date just changed. I was UR 12/6 (right after my interview) and it updated to UR 12/18 just now
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Me tooBigZuck wrote:My status also updated today. Originally under review back in November. Never interviewed, bad numbers. Sorry bros (unless everyone updated today).
- RSterling
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm RD as well. I really don't think (call it naivete) that the dates mean much. It's looking like most people updated today. But way to give out the tough love, bro.BigZuck wrote:RD. Didn't know that, I take back my apology. You bros are good.djwjddl wrote:Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.BigZuck wrote:My status also updated today. Originally under review back in November. Never interviewed, bad numbers. Sorry bros (unless everyone updated today).
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
interviewed on 12/6 and a few hours after it said 12/6 uner review and i too am at 12/18 now....
can someone check the scores of those at 12/18 so we can figure if its a good omen or not....
oh and im rd as well
can someone check the scores of those at 12/18 so we can figure if its a good omen or not....
oh and im rd as well
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
djwjddl wrote:
Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
probably accurate but nyu and penn it seems like it did so hard for me to not get my hopes updjwjddl wrote:djwjddl wrote:
Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
because you asked (and i have nothing better to do). here's the breakdown for all those RD applicants whose statuses updated today and whose stats are available...1 person's stats missing and another had to be estimatedAnonymous4444 wrote:probably accurate but nyu and penn it seems like it did so hard for me to not get my hopes updjwjddl wrote:djwjddl wrote:
Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.
25th 168 3.8
Median 169 3.9
75th 172 3.9
Last edited by djwjddl on Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 for the RD update traindjwjddl wrote:because you asked (and i have nothing better to do). here's the breakdown for all those RD applicants whose statuses updated today and whose stats are available...1 person's stats missingAnonymous4444 wrote:probably accurate but nyu and penn it seems like it did so hard for me to not get my hopes updjwjddl wrote:djwjddl wrote:
Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.
25th 167.75 3.75
Median 168.5 3.85
75th 169.75 3.925
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ha u r awesome. i like thisdjwjddl wrote:because you asked (and i have nothing better to do). here's the breakdown for all those RD applicants whose statuses updated today and whose stats are available...1 person's stats missing and another had to be estimatedAnonymous4444 wrote:probably accurate but nyu and penn it seems like it did so hard for me to not get my hopes updjwjddl wrote:djwjddl wrote:
Are you ED? Also, status updates mean nothing for final outcome for chicago.
25th 168 3.8
Median 169 3.9
75th 172 3.9
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
i knew i should've used google docs or something lol. here's the updated:WhiteyCakes wrote: +1 for the RD update train
25: 168.25 / 3.725
Median: 170.5 / 3.85
75: 172 / 3.9
-
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My status also updated to today after going under review 11/20. My LSAT is below the 25th and at median of these statistics. Wasn't asked to interview.djwjddl wrote:i knew i should've used google docs or something lol. here's the updated:WhiteyCakes wrote: +1 for the RD update train
25: 168.25 / 3.725
Median: 170.5 / 3.85
75: 172 / 3.9
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
its funny bec theses numbers remind me of chicago's actual numbers but without softs and more applicants it cant tell us much.
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
so, is this the consensus that, interview or not, everyone will have to go from "complete" to "UR" before any decisions? I'm asking because my status was updated to "complete" on 12/5 and I'm not sure if I'm UR or not.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yes. you must go UR first before getting any sort of news. also, it will specifically say "Application Under Review" when you go under review in your status checker.wisteria wrote:so, is this the consensus that, interview or not, everyone will have to go from "complete" to "UR" before any decisions? I'm asking because my status was updated to "complete" on 12/5 and I'm not sure if I'm UR or not.
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks!djwjddl wrote:yes. you must go UR first before getting any sort of news. also, it will specifically say "Application Under Review" when you go under review in your status checker.wisteria wrote:so, is this the consensus that, interview or not, everyone will have to go from "complete" to "UR" before any decisions? I'm asking because my status was updated to "complete" on 12/5 and I'm not sure if I'm UR or not.
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
any chance in that we are getting responses for rd before jan? this new update got me wonderin.....
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No way. Adcoms need some holiday cheer too, Anonymous4444. Come on.Anonymous4444 wrote:any chance in that we are getting responses for rd before jan? this new update got me wonderin.....
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login