Same. I imagine there will be a wave of new URs on Monday or Tuesday now that this batch is out.GoldenGriffin wrote:Submitted back in November, still haven't gone under review yet.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats everyone! Feel free to join us in the c/o 2016 thread
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=200475
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=200475
- Nala7892
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:33 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm in too! Applied 11/2, interview 2/13! 170/3.76. I'm so excited right now
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by sokomofo on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No decision. Not that I'm sour-grapesing or anything, it's just that I've never been to Chicago and only have what I hear on NPR to go off. Are people liable to get shot in Hyde Park?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ironically they gave un-promised decisions, but not the pseudo-promised twitter update. Anyhow, I have nothing to complain about, but think about all the poor, isolated, TLSless masses!
- amsong
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted, no interview. I'm not all that surprised. If anything, I'm happy I wasn't dinged.
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.shakespeare wrote:In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
I thought mine was great too.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well some people who had Dean Perry didn't seem to enjoy the experience too much.Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.shakespeare wrote:In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
I thought mine was great too.
As for people who had... the other person... well...
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.
...wait, not LOVED loved. Don't judge me.
...wait, not LOVED loved. Don't judge me.
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I was expecting ice cold death stares, but nah. It was pleasant.MacB wrote:I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ditto.Jaqen wrote:I was expecting ice cold death stares, but nah. It was pleasant.MacB wrote:I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.
also, I owe someone a snickerdoodle.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I mean, if you act stupidly enough, you're liable to get shot anywhere in Chicago. But generally Hyde Park is fine. Source: I'm from Chicago.Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:No decision. Not that I'm sour-grapesing or anything, it's just that I've never been to Chicago and only have what I hear on NPR to go off. Are people liable to get shot in Hyde Park?
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted yesterday. Weird thing is I withdrew my app three weeks ago and their office confirmed. Is this common? It feels like they're trying to manipulate their acceptance rate...
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted yesterday. Surprised because I expected a ding. Under 25% GPA and at median LSAT.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
you might want to re-confirm your withdrawal - you don't run into any problems in the springhoneybadger12 wrote:Waitlisted yesterday. Weird thing is I withdrew my app three weeks ago and their office confirmed. Is this common? It feels like they're trying to manipulate their acceptance rate...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)vzapana wrote:Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...
- hhockberger
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dinged yesterday, as expected. Congrats admits!!
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah I'm sure even WLs are underreported because there were people ITT who reported WL after interview yesterday but there are none on the spreadsheet.reallysearch wrote:I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)vzapana wrote:Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's still kind of useful if you judge the amount of people who answered 'accepted' vs. the original 'invited to interview' spreadsheet.reallysearch wrote:I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)vzapana wrote:Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I want my UR
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.shakespeare wrote:In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
I thought mine was great too.
Sry I was refering to much earlier comments. Ppl had said they felt the interviewer was bored and gave one word answers to their questions.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I applied late(1/15) and haven't heard anything, though my application is complete. Did those who were rejected get an email? Or just see it on status checker? Mine in probably coming today:(
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login