Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If I was UR 1/31, should I have expected an interview invite by now if I was going to receive one?
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I interviewed recently also and think it went pretty well. I didn't have much time to prepare as I got the slot short-notice but there were really no big curveball questions. Seems like they are just trying to get to know you a bit better. Regulus' thread on interviews had most of the questions she asked. Good luck, don't fret it!learntolift wrote:how'd it go? mines tomorrow at 1whereskyle wrote:just interviewed. quickest turn around time?
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I botched my interview on every level, it was a while ago now.
"what is your greatest accomplishment"
*silence*...... uhh, yeah
Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.
"what is your greatest accomplishment"
*silence*...... uhh, yeah
Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You really should have an answer for that, its a stock question for any interview.john7234797 wrote:I botched my interview on every level, it was a while ago now.
"what is your greatest accomplishment"
*silence*...... uhh, yeah
Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?
for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:13 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Why can't you name both? Talk about why you liked each of them.learntolift wrote: do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?
for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:29 pm
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
i actually talked about a film project i did. i would just go with whatever you were truly most passionate about.learntolift wrote:do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?
for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In that case absolutely sincere. If some question like "Why Law School" or "Why Chicago" and your best reason is that you had nothing better to do or #5, then do not be sincere.learntolift wrote:do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?
for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Can anybody get on LSN for Chicago? Or is that just down forever?
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Works for me.callmemaybe84 wrote:Can anybody get on LSN for Chicago? Or is that just down forever?
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
go with whatever you were truly most passionate aboutCrowing wrote:i actually talked about a film project i did. i would just go with whatever you were truly most passionate about.learntolift wrote:do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?
for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
+1
it's hard to engage the interviewer if you are not convinced by what you are saying
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
sounds good, genuine it is.
when they refer to 'work style' do they mean like alone vs. in groups, or under pressure vs. taking time going slow, or just all of that combined? seems very abstract to me
when they refer to 'work style' do they mean like alone vs. in groups, or under pressure vs. taking time going slow, or just all of that combined? seems very abstract to me
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'd imagine they just want to know how you work in general. What is the strategy that your normally employ? If it's not the same under all conditions, maybe mention how you adjust it based on the conditions and specify why.learntolift wrote:sounds good, genuine it is.
when they refer to 'work style' do they mean like alone vs. in groups, or under pressure vs. taking time going slow, or just all of that combined? seems very abstract to me
Don't be afraid to ask, too, if you're unsure - it's better than just wandering in blind. When she asked me about my greatest accomplishment, I asked whether she meant personally or professionally. She said either, and so I responded accordingly.
If I had received the question, I was going to describe how I work in the same way that I respond to programming errors. Unfortunately I never got the opportunity - I was hoping for that question!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- star fox
- Posts: 20790
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Definite learning experience.ChampagnePapi wrote:You really should have an answer for that, its a stock question for any interview.john7234797 wrote:I botched my interview on every level, it was a while ago now.
"what is your greatest accomplishment"
*silence*...... uhh, yeah
Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So I think there are at least 2 decent reasons for believing that the next batch of decisions will come out tomorrow.
1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).
Eh, eh??
1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).
Eh, eh??
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thought I might not be the only one who needs this wonderful tool right about now.robot_socrates wrote:So I think there are at least 2 decent reasons for believing that the next batch of decisions will come out tomorrow.
1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).
Eh, eh??
(Old, I know)
Me
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That nicely sums up my last 3.5 months.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Thought I might not be the only one who needs this wonderful tool right about now.robot_socrates wrote:So I think there are at least 2 decent reasons for believing that the next batch of decisions will come out tomorrow.
1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).
Eh, eh??
(Old, I know)
Metomorrowevery morning:
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by sokomofo on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ah nice, got mine in 5 hours. probably will go over my answers once more out loud an hour or 2 beforehand but other than that no real point in fretting now. just gonna occupy my mind elsewhere, i think i am hyping it up too much in my headsokomofo wrote:so i had my interview yesterday, and i think it went well. i feel like it couldve been better though, i left out some of the information that i had prepared. all the questions i got were already mentioned in this thread. my interviewer could not have been nicer! such a sweetheart.
hopefully i can be included in the next round of acceptance wave haha
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I had my interview last week on 2/7 after which my status changed back to under review. Then I had another update on my profile on 2/11. Anyone else get a second update after their interview?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also I posted this in the interview thread but I was asked a question not listed by the others.learntolift wrote:ah nice, got mine in 5 hours. probably will go over my answers once more out loud an hour or 2 beforehand but other than that no real point in fretting now. just gonna occupy my mind elsewhere, i think i am hyping it up too much in my headsokomofo wrote:so i had my interview yesterday, and i think it went well. i feel like it couldve been better though, i left out some of the information that i had prepared. all the questions i got were already mentioned in this thread. my interviewer could not have been nicer! such a sweetheart.
hopefully i can be included in the next round of acceptance wave haha
Who inspired you to go to law school?
Good luck!
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I had that second update too. I think I've seen others in this thread who said they have, as well.Gisney wrote:I had my interview last week on 2/7 after which my status changed back to under review. Then I had another update on my profile on 2/11. Anyone else get a second update after their interview?
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1. Went back UR 2/6 after my interview. Now I'm UR2 on 2/11clouded.memory wrote:I had that second update too. I think I've seen others in this thread who said they have, as well.Gisney wrote:I had my interview last week on 2/7 after which my status changed back to under review. Then I had another update on my profile on 2/11. Anyone else get a second update after their interview?
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Two questions.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login