Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10361
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jbagelboy » Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:23 pm

If I was UR 1/31, should I have expected an interview invite by now if I was going to receive one?

voytek

Bronze
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:06 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by voytek » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:07 pm

learntolift wrote:
whereskyle wrote:just interviewed. quickest turn around time?
how'd it go? mines tomorrow at 1
I interviewed recently also and think it went pretty well. I didn't have much time to prepare as I got the slot short-notice but there were really no big curveball questions. Seems like they are just trying to get to know you a bit better. Regulus' thread on interviews had most of the questions she asked. Good luck, don't fret it!

User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by star fox » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:20 pm

I botched my interview on every level, it was a while ago now.

"what is your greatest accomplishment"

*silence*...... uhh, yeah

Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Rahviveh » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:27 pm

john7234797 wrote:I botched my interview on every level, it was a while ago now.

"what is your greatest accomplishment"

*silence*...... uhh, yeah

Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.
You really should have an answer for that, its a stock question for any interview.

User avatar
learntolift

Bronze
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by learntolift » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:29 pm

do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?

for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


khaleesi

New
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:13 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by khaleesi » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:30 pm

learntolift wrote: do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?

for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:29 pm
Why can't you name both? Talk about why you liked each of them.

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:31 pm

learntolift wrote:do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?

for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
i actually talked about a film project i did. i would just go with whatever you were truly most passionate about.

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 2014 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:44 pm

learntolift wrote:do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?

for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
In that case absolutely sincere. If some question like "Why Law School" or "Why Chicago" and your best reason is that you had nothing better to do or #5, then do not be sincere.

User avatar
callmemaybe84

Bronze
Posts: 147
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by callmemaybe84 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:18 pm

Can anybody get on LSN for Chicago? Or is that just down forever?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
venus

Bronze
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by venus » Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:22 pm

callmemaybe84 wrote:Can anybody get on LSN for Chicago? Or is that just down forever?
Works for me.

User avatar
reallysearch

Bronze
Posts: 106
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by reallysearch » Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:04 pm

Crowing wrote:
learntolift wrote:do you all think it's better to be completely honest, or suck up kind of?

for example, if they ask what my favorite class was...truthfully it was a film symposium class i took. but i took a lot of interesting law classes too, should i name one of them as this IS a law school interview?
i actually talked about a film project i did. i would just go with whatever you were truly most passionate about.
go with whatever you were truly most passionate about

+1

it's hard to engage the interviewer if you are not convinced by what you are saying

User avatar
learntolift

Bronze
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by learntolift » Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:22 pm

sounds good, genuine it is.

when they refer to 'work style' do they mean like alone vs. in groups, or under pressure vs. taking time going slow, or just all of that combined? seems very abstract to me

User avatar
LSATSCORES2012

Silver
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by LSATSCORES2012 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:37 pm

learntolift wrote:sounds good, genuine it is.

when they refer to 'work style' do they mean like alone vs. in groups, or under pressure vs. taking time going slow, or just all of that combined? seems very abstract to me
I'd imagine they just want to know how you work in general. What is the strategy that your normally employ? If it's not the same under all conditions, maybe mention how you adjust it based on the conditions and specify why.

Don't be afraid to ask, too, if you're unsure - it's better than just wandering in blind. When she asked me about my greatest accomplishment, I asked whether she meant personally or professionally. She said either, and so I responded accordingly.

If I had received the question, I was going to describe how I work in the same way that I respond to programming errors. Unfortunately I never got the opportunity - I was hoping for that question!

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
star fox

Diamond
Posts: 20790
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:13 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by star fox » Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:15 pm

ChampagnePapi wrote:
john7234797 wrote:I botched my interview on every level, it was a while ago now.

"what is your greatest accomplishment"

*silence*...... uhh, yeah

Wasn't expecting to get in this cycle anyways.
You really should have an answer for that, its a stock question for any interview.
Definite learning experience.

20141023

Gold
Posts: 3070
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 20141023 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:49 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
robot_socrates

New
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by robot_socrates » Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:52 pm

So I think there are at least 2 decent reasons for believing that the next batch of decisions will come out tomorrow.

1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).

Eh, eh??

User avatar
LSATSCORES2012

Silver
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by LSATSCORES2012 » Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:57 pm

robot_socrates wrote:So I think there are at least 2 decent reasons for believing that the next batch of decisions will come out tomorrow.

1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).

Eh, eh??
Thought I might not be the only one who needs this wonderful tool right about now.

(Old, I know)

Image



Me tomorrowevery morning:

Image

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
robot_socrates

New
Posts: 93
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by robot_socrates » Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:15 pm

LSATSCORES2012 wrote:
robot_socrates wrote:So I think there are at least 2 decent reasons for believing that the next batch of decisions will come out tomorrow.

1. Tomorrow counts as Mid-February.
2. The last batch of decisions came out on a Wednesday. (Which is why I sense tomorrow is more likely than Thursday).

Eh, eh??
Thought I might not be the only one who needs this wonderful tool right about now.

(Old, I know)

Image



Me tomorrowevery morning:

Image
That nicely sums up my last 3.5 months.

sokomofo

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by sokomofo » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:32 am

.
Last edited by sokomofo on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
learntolift

Bronze
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by learntolift » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:09 pm

sokomofo wrote:so i had my interview yesterday, and i think it went well. i feel like it couldve been better though, i left out some of the information that i had prepared. all the questions i got were already mentioned in this thread. my interviewer could not have been nicer! such a sweetheart.

hopefully i can be included in the next round of acceptance wave haha
ah nice, got mine in 5 hours. probably will go over my answers once more out loud an hour or 2 beforehand but other than that no real point in fretting now. just gonna occupy my mind elsewhere, i think i am hyping it up too much in my head

Gisney

Bronze
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Gisney » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:09 pm

I had my interview last week on 2/7 after which my status changed back to under review. Then I had another update on my profile on 2/11. Anyone else get a second update after their interview?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Gisney

Bronze
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Gisney » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:10 pm

learntolift wrote:
sokomofo wrote:so i had my interview yesterday, and i think it went well. i feel like it couldve been better though, i left out some of the information that i had prepared. all the questions i got were already mentioned in this thread. my interviewer could not have been nicer! such a sweetheart.

hopefully i can be included in the next round of acceptance wave haha
ah nice, got mine in 5 hours. probably will go over my answers once more out loud an hour or 2 beforehand but other than that no real point in fretting now. just gonna occupy my mind elsewhere, i think i am hyping it up too much in my head
Also I posted this in the interview thread but I was asked a question not listed by the others.

Who inspired you to go to law school?

Good luck!

User avatar
clouded.memory

Bronze
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by clouded.memory » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:11 pm

Gisney wrote:I had my interview last week on 2/7 after which my status changed back to under review. Then I had another update on my profile on 2/11. Anyone else get a second update after their interview?
I had that second update too. I think I've seen others in this thread who said they have, as well.

User avatar
Teflon_Don

Bronze
Posts: 474
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Teflon_Don » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:21 pm

clouded.memory wrote:
Gisney wrote:I had my interview last week on 2/7 after which my status changed back to under review. Then I had another update on my profile on 2/11. Anyone else get a second update after their interview?
I had that second update too. I think I've seen others in this thread who said they have, as well.
+1. Went back UR 2/6 after my interview. Now I'm UR2 on 2/11

whereskyle

Silver
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by whereskyle » Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:28 pm

Two questions.

Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?

Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?

Thanks, all.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”