Reading too much into things. I guess I'm an official TLSer nowChampagnePapi wrote:Makes no differenceMayBJack426 wrote:Hm..mine says the same thing. I just checked 2 other status checkers that are also complete, and this is not included. again, hmmm...Kionaltski wrote:Hey, I noticed something funny. In my status checker, there's a new line under the Applicant Fee which says "class deposit"...0.00... .00 Is this just something that happens when you go complete? I was already complete for some time...
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Kionaltski
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:23 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- lsacqueen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in. App went complete as of 10/2. Best of luck, all!
- sean21
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:45 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
checking in
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 4:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How did you guys list the number of hours per week for each activity you were involved in, on your resume? VP of X Org (2 hours per week)??? For many of my extracurricular activities my involvement is somewhat inconsistent; we will have a big 5 hour event one week and then do almost nothing for the next two weeks. I'm sure I am not alone on this one.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- spicyyoda17
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I averaged my hours out over the bulk of the semester. So if it was 5 hours one week, a few more here and there, and altogether maybe 15 hours/semester, I just wrote 1 hr/wk.TunnelVision wrote:How did you guys list the number of hours per week for each activity you were involved in, on your resume? VP of X Org (2 hours per week)??? For many of my extracurricular activities my involvement is somewhat inconsistent; we will have a big 5 hour event one week and then do almost nothing for the next two weeks. I'm sure I am not alone on this one.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I didn't list hours at all. I figured if they were curious they would ask, but the important thing is that I did the activity.TunnelVision wrote:How did you guys list the number of hours per week for each activity you were involved in, on your resume? VP of X Org (2 hours per week)??? For many of my extracurricular activities my involvement is somewhat inconsistent; we will have a big 5 hour event one week and then do almost nothing for the next two weeks. I'm sure I am not alone on this one.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The resume instructions said to list hours.
I approximated, though there was one activity that is just too inconsistent to even try to approximate so I wrote something like "hours vary."
I approximated, though there was one activity that is just too inconsistent to even try to approximate so I wrote something like "hours vary."
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. Submitted Sept. 6th.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- tyler.durden
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same, submitted day 1Lavitz wrote:Same. Submitted Sept. 6th.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The sad part is that even with the update, I know that Chicago isn't going to send out decisions anytime soon. Why I randomly checked the status today is beyond metyler.durden wrote:Same, submitted day 1Lavitz wrote:Same. Submitted Sept. 6th.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- danitt
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
I'm so convinced that I won't get in that I actually forgot that I applied here.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. Also was submitted and was complete first day.
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also 10/29 UR. Still considering ED.
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I forgot my password, requested a new one on the web site, then got nervous/excited about receiving an email from Chicago literally two seconds later. I apparently have NO short term memory. Also, UR 10/29.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1. I sent myself an email, then got excited and thought it was JS1... I had to laugh at myself.banjo wrote:I forgot my password, requested a new one on the web site, then got nervous/excited about receiving an email from Chicago literally two seconds later. I apparently have NO short term memory. Also, UR 10/29.
- skers
- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
With your numbers EDing is retarded, especially since a bunch of people got off the WL this year with $$ChampagnePapi wrote:Also 10/29 UR. Still considering ED.
- 2014
- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I said the same thing but he convinced me otherwise after a PM convo, just to not thoroughly discredit his judgmentTemporarySaint wrote:With your numbers EDing is retarded, especially since a bunch of people got off the WL this year with $$ChampagnePapi wrote:Also 10/29 UR. Still considering ED.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Took a nice month and a half TLS break. Good (?) to be back.bernaldiaz wrote: LOL sorry will bow out for a while. Frankly, I'm annoying myself.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Welcome backbernaldiaz wrote:Took a nice month and a half TLS break. Good (?) to be back.bernaldiaz wrote: LOL sorry will bow out for a while. Frankly, I'm annoying myself.
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in!
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just submitted. Good luck all. :)
- Mr. Elshal
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login