Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum

[Ramius]

Got the email today! 168/3.43, thank you faculty review and your cryptic methods! Been complete since 10/25, thought for sure I'd be a ding!

[nba101790]

Got the email today! 168/3.43, thank you faculty review and your cryptic methods! Been complete since 10/25, thought for sure I'd be a ding!

Congrats!

Giving me a sliver of hope.

[goden]

Got the email today! 168/3.43, thank you faculty review and your cryptic methods! Been complete since 10/25, thought for sure I'd be a ding!

Wait are you in? Or under faculty review?

[Ramius]

Got the email today! 168/3.43, thank you faculty review and your cryptic methods! Been complete since 10/25, thought for sure I'd be a ding!

Wait are you in? Or under faculty review?

In as of this afternoon

[jbagelboy]

Congrats to all the new admits! hope to see you at ASW!

[danitt]

NOW IS NOT THE TIME UC IRVINE!!!!

[moneyball026]

NOW IS NOT THE TIME UC IRVINE!!!!

Seriously, even putting University of California as the header. Worst trolling of the cycle, even worse than the Northwestern Thanksgiving message.

[lt_universe]

NOW IS NOT THE TIME UC IRVINE!!!!

THIS!

[goden]

NOW IS NOT THE TIME UC IRVINE!!!!

[arrggg]

NOW IS NOT THE TIME UC IRVINE!!!!

Seriously, even putting University of California as the header. Worst trolling of the cycle, even worse than the Northwestern Thanksgiving message.

Let's not forget the Berkeley financial aid e-mail either.

[04102014]

This was probably already answered, but is there a way to tell if you are specifically under faculty review? Is the status different?

[djwjddl]

This was probably already answered, but is there a way to tell if you are specifically under faculty review? Is the status different?

Try searching the thread next time. You'll be notified via email

[Ramius]

This was probably already answered, but is there a way to tell if you are specifically under faculty review? Is the status different?

Nothing tells you that you made faculty review. You stay as "complete" for as long as they feel like torturing you. I was complete going on 3 months and just got the email, so I'm guessing they are starting to release their faculty review decisions. Just keep your ear to the ground!

[04102014]

This was probably already answered, but is there a way to tell if you are specifically under faculty review? Is the status different?

Try searching the thread next time. You'll be notified via email

I did and saw conflicting answers. Just like on this page (e.g. the previous two posts)

[goden]

Yeah, I didn't they started placing anyone in faculty review yet.

[djwjddl]

This was probably already answered, but is there a way to tell if you are specifically under faculty review? Is the status different?

Nothing tells you that you made faculty review. You stay as "complete" for as long as they feel like torturing you. I was complete going on 3 months and just got the email, so I'm guessing they are starting to release their faculty review decisions. Just keep your ear to the ground!

what makes you think you were accepted vis-a-vis fac review?

[Ramius]

This was probably already answered, but is there a way to tell if you are specifically under faculty review? Is the status different?

Nothing tells you that you made faculty review. You stay as "complete" for as long as they feel like torturing you. I was complete going on 3 months and just got the email, so I'm guessing they are starting to release their faculty review decisions. Just keep your ear to the ground!

what makes you think you were accepted vis-a-vis fac review?

Ultimately an educated hunch based on how they seem to do admissions. Dean Tom even said he has his initial presumptive admits that get a quick glance and then the rest enter faculty review. I can't be sure of this and it is entirely conjecture, but with my numbers (slightly above LSAT, way below GPA median), it only seems to make sense.

[mehh]

THIS. IS. TORTURE.

[djwjddl]

Ultimately an educated hunch based on how they seem to do admissions. Dean Tom even said he has his initial presumptive admits that get a quick glance and then the rest enter faculty review. I can't be sure of this and it is entirely conjecture, but with my numbers (slightly above LSAT, way below GPA median), it only seems to make sense.

No. You were not admitted via the committe review process. You would've received an email if you had been put under committee review. This is how it has been done for past cycles.

Give it a week or so and you'll see people posting on here that they've received an email notifying them that they've gone under committee review.

[Ramius]

Ultimately an educated hunch based on how they seem to do admissions. Dean Tom even said he has his initial presumptive admits that get a quick glance and then the rest enter faculty review. I can't be sure of this and it is entirely conjecture, but with my numbers (slightly above LSAT, way below GPA median), it only seems to make sense.

No. You were not admitted via the committe review process. You would've received an email if you had been put under committee review. This is how it has been done for past cycles.

Give it a week or so and you'll see people posting on here that they've received an email notifying them that they've gone under committee review.

Just checked my email to make sure, but I guess I stand corrected. Unbelievable.

[delarge3]

NOW IS NOT THE TIME UC IRVINE!!!!

Seriously, even putting University of California as the header. Worst trolling of the cycle, even worse than the Northwestern Thanksgiving message.

Let's not forget the Berkeley financial aid e-mail either.

I shouldn't complain... but the financial aid email from Berkeley right after the admit email is just mean. Started seeing dollar signs until I realized it was just spam.

[04102014]

Ultimately an educated hunch based on how they seem to do admissions. Dean Tom even said he has his initial presumptive admits that get a quick glance and then the rest enter faculty review. I can't be sure of this and it is entirely conjecture, but with my numbers (slightly above LSAT, way below GPA median), it only seems to make sense.

No. You were not admitted via the committe review process. You would've received an email if you had been put under committee review. This is how it has been done for past cycles.

Give it a week or so and you'll see people posting on here that they've received an email notifying them that they've gone under committee review.

Just checked my email to make sure, but I guess I stand corrected. Unbelievable.

Congrats by the way!

[arrggg]

Ultimately an educated hunch based on how they seem to do admissions. Dean Tom even said he has his initial presumptive admits that get a quick glance and then the rest enter faculty review. I can't be sure of this and it is entirely conjecture, but with my numbers (slightly above LSAT, way below GPA median), it only seems to make sense.

No. You were not admitted via the committe review process. You would've received an email if you had been put under committee review. This is how it has been done for past cycles.

Give it a week or so and you'll see people posting on here that they've received an email notifying them that they've gone under committee review.

Just checked my email to make sure, but I guess I stand corrected. Unbelievable.

Don't worry. You still bring hope to us all.

[BigZuck]

How pissed would people be ITT if they found out Matthewsean was URM or an Olympic medalist or something?

Anyway I refuse to have any hope. My hope is dead. Gimme my ding.

[goden]

Looking at his LSN, he does have military as a soft. Congrats matthewsean!