wrong threadVincent wrote:GWU (RD): Emailed acceptance.
Notre Dame: snail-mail packet.
Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- helix23
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Not disputing this but I thought I saw somewhere that Duke placed 10% of its class in California? Maybe on the Duke website?
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:28 am, edited 4 times in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Harvard only 2% above Cornell? Whoa.Regulus wrote:+1helix23 wrote:+1goden wrote:If you want California, B almost always > CCN.twinkletoes16 wrote:Yep, unless Harvard or Stanford dip below to take me, I would choose berk.
If I want to live and practice in California, is choosing berk over CCN that dumb?
Employment rates in CA for the T14:
Berkeley: 61.9%
Stanford: 40.1%
Harvard: 12.2%
Chicago: 11.3%
Northwestern: 10.1%
Cornell: 10.0%
Yale: 9.8%
NYU: 9.4%
Columbia: 9.2%
Michigan: 9.0%
GULC: 7.6%
UVA: 5.6%
Penn:
Duke:
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I believe most practice in New York. I wouldn't take it as not being able to place there, just a preference of the student body. If you spent three years in Ithaca, you'd likely want to move west as well.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Harvard only 2% above Cornell? Whoa.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That's the problem with all of these state specific rankings, really.teiswei wrote:I believe most practice in New York. I wouldn't take it as not being able to place there, just a preference of the student body. If you spent three years in Ithaca, you'd likely want to move west as well.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Harvard only 2% above Cornell? Whoa.
It would be really nice to have access to the percentage of people who TRIED to work in a certain state that were able to find some employment there, regardless of whether or not they opted to actually go with it. Does anyone know of a good place to find that info?
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That's what I mistaked your previous data for, hence the shock at the 2% disparity between Crimson and Big Red. I would assume HYS JDs, unless they're bottom 10% of the class or so, are pretty transferable everywhere.Regulus wrote:Bingo. That is exactly what we need. I am not sure if such data even exists, but something that we might be able to use instead is how many people from a certain school took the California bar as a general indicator of the number of graduates who "wanted" to work in Cali.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:It would be really nice to have access to the percentage of people who TRIED to work in a certain state that were able to find some employment there, regardless of whether or not they opted to actually go with it. Does anyone know of a good place to find that info?
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Don't most people get a job offer (from wherever they interned) even before graduation, so they take the bar where their job is?Regulus wrote:Bingo. That is exactly what we need. I am not sure if such data even exists, but something that we might be able to use instead is how many people from a certain school took the California bar as a general indicator of the number of graduates who "wanted" to work in Cali.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:It would be really nice to have access to the percentage of people who TRIED to work in a certain state that were able to find some employment there, regardless of whether or not they opted to actually go with it. Does anyone know of a good place to find that info?
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
lol - i downloaded the entire report from which these rankings are drawn... it's actually rather interesting to think about what is valued (and what isn't) when we look at law school rankings. it's also a total coincidence that these rankings are determined by the president of cooley lawRegulus wrote:Generally speaking, that is how it is supposed to work... states like Cali and NY are kind of exclusive, but with other states you can pass the bar and then quite easily become eligible to practice in neighboring / nearby states.venus wrote:Don't most people get a job offer (from wherever they interned) even before graduation, so they take the bar where their job is?
More than bar passage rates, though, the thing that I am most worried about is how the economy is going to affect the law school rankings. According to the most recent data, Berkeley has actually left the T14 and falled to #27.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
LOL thomas cooley at #2. I knew it!!! Still not too late to apply I hopeRegulus wrote:Generally speaking, that is how it is supposed to work... states like Cali and NY are kind of exclusive, but with other states you can pass the bar and then quite easily become eligible to practice in neighboring / nearby states.venus wrote:Don't most people get a job offer (from wherever they interned) even before graduation, so they take the bar where their job is?
More than bar passage rates, though, the thing that I am most worried about is how the economy is going to affect the law school rankings. According to the most recent data, Berkeley has actually left the T14 and fallen to #27.
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Library and square footage related stuff = 550% more important than academic indicators and achievement.Regulus wrote:Yes. In the new ranking methodology, each of the following 40 categories receive 2.5% of a school's total score:ht2988 wrote:lol - i downloaded the entire report from which these rankings are drawn... it's actually rather interesting to think about what is valued (and what isn't) when we look at law school rankings. it's also a total coincidence that these rankings are determined by the president of cooley law
Total J.D. Enrollment
Total Minority Enrollment
Percentage of Minority Students
J.D. First-Year Matriculant Rankings
J.D. First-Year Minority Enrollment Rankings
J.D. First-Year Minority Percentage Rankings
J.D. Foreign National Students
J.D. Foreign National Percentage Rankings
Median Percentile Undergraduate Grade Point Average
Median Percentile LSAT Scores
Total Applications
Number of Full-Time Faculty
Number of Part-Time Faculty
Total Teaching Faculty
Number of Minority Faculty
Student-Faculty Ratio
Typical First-Year Section Size
Number of Course Titles Beyond the First Year
Full-Time Resident Tuition
Full-Time Non-resident Tuition
Percentage of Students Receiving Grants/Scholarships
Median Amount of Grants/Scholarships
Full-Time Resident Affordability Rankings
Full-time Non-Resident Affordability Rankings
Library Materials Expenditure
Total Volumes in Library
Total Titles in Library
Total Serial Subscriptions
Number of Professional Librarians
Library Hours per Week with Professional Staff
Total Library Hours per Week
Library Seating Capacity
Number of Networked Computers Available for Use by Students
Library Total Square Footage
Non-Library Total Square Footage
Total Law School Square Footage
Percentage of Graduates Employed
Number of States in which Graduates are Employed
First-Time Bar Passage Percentage
Program Achievement Rating Rank
Because of this wonderfully new library-centric methodology, not only has Berkeley fallen to #27, but even the mighy Yale has dropped to #10.
Godspeed Cooley, Godspeed.
- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
harveyfan wrote:So I submitted my application on the 11th and went under review on the 21st. I'm really nervous since I haven't heard anything since.
Can someone just tell me I'm being silly? / Do I have reason to worry? I know a lot of others who went UR on the 21st have heard back.
I'm 169/3.83.
I have similar #s (168 3.92), submitted in early oct. and still under review.
- lsacqueen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I lol'd.John_rizzy_rawls wrote:Library and square footage related stuff = 550% more important than academic indicators and achievement.Regulus wrote:Yes. In the new ranking methodology, each of the following 40 categories receive 2.5% of a school's total score:ht2988 wrote:lol - i downloaded the entire report from which these rankings are drawn... it's actually rather interesting to think about what is valued (and what isn't) when we look at law school rankings. it's also a total coincidence that these rankings are determined by the president of cooley law
Total J.D. Enrollment
Total Minority Enrollment
Percentage of Minority Students
J.D. First-Year Matriculant Rankings
J.D. First-Year Minority Enrollment Rankings
J.D. First-Year Minority Percentage Rankings
J.D. Foreign National Students
J.D. Foreign National Percentage Rankings
Median Percentile Undergraduate Grade Point Average
Median Percentile LSAT Scores
Total Applications
Number of Full-Time Faculty
Number of Part-Time Faculty
Total Teaching Faculty
Number of Minority Faculty
Student-Faculty Ratio
Typical First-Year Section Size
Number of Course Titles Beyond the First Year
Full-Time Resident Tuition
Full-Time Non-resident Tuition
Percentage of Students Receiving Grants/Scholarships
Median Amount of Grants/Scholarships
Full-Time Resident Affordability Rankings
Full-time Non-Resident Affordability Rankings
Library Materials Expenditure
Total Volumes in Library
Total Titles in Library
Total Serial Subscriptions
Number of Professional Librarians
Library Hours per Week with Professional Staff
Total Library Hours per Week
Library Seating Capacity
Number of Networked Computers Available for Use by Students
Library Total Square Footage
Non-Library Total Square Footage
Total Law School Square Footage
Percentage of Graduates Employed
Number of States in which Graduates are Employed
First-Time Bar Passage Percentage
Program Achievement Rating Rank
Because of this wonderfully new library-centric methodology, not only has Berkeley fallen to #27, but even the mighy Yale has dropped to #10.
Godspeed Cooley, Godspeed.
Also, count me in on the Berkeley looove train... Since getting in here I've been getting REAL excited.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Mdenis1
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:06 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Hahahaha at those rankings! Chicago-Kent and University of Miami before Stanford... Absolutely right!
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Went over the calculation criterion in amusement and realized the library data is taken only from the law-specific libraries. I wonder what would happen if they factored in all of the libraries available on a campus instead of just the designated law libraries. In reality, Berkeley law students have access to not only those, but also the "three main libraries (Doe, Moffitt, and the Bancroft), 18 subject-specialty libraries, and 11 affiliated libraries (with special collections) make up the UC Berkeley Library system."because of this wonderfully new library-centric methodology, not only has Berkeley fallen to #27, but even the mighty Yale has dropped to #10.
Calculate that, Cooley. =P
Also, for your entertainment (as the plot thickens): Cooley law has five campuses, each with a separate library. I would be interested to know if it includes all 5 libraries into the singular "Cooley law library" calculation. Hahaha
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
As mentioned above, I'm fairly sure everyone who goes to b wants to stay in California mostly...or at least the dean has mentioned that people who didn't originally, after 3 years, decide west coast is the best coast and stay there. But for CCN...are most gunning for east coast biglaw and so the few west coast placements are self-selecting/less competition? Do law firms/offices in the west coast (SF/SJ/SV/LA) want CCN kids or only B, S, UCLA, USC?Regulus wrote:+1helix23 wrote:+1goden wrote:If you want California, B almost always > CCN.twinkletoes16 wrote:Yep, unless Harvard or Stanford dip below to take me, I would choose berk.
If I want to live and practice in California, is choosing berk over CCN that dumb?
Employment rates in CA for the T14:
Berkeley: 61.9%
Stanford: 40.1%
Harvard: 12.2%
Chicago: 11.3%
Northwestern: 10.1%
Cornell: 10.0%
Yale: 9.8%
NYU: 9.4%
Columbia: 9.2%
Michigan: 9.0%
GULC: 7.6%
UVA: 5.6%
Penn:
Duke:
These are the dumb things I speculate about while I sit and wait for a first acceptance. COME ON ANYBODY
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:24 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think it's hard to answer this outside of accumulating anecdotes, so I will offer one. I have a friend at CCN who is around median, has California ties, and wanted Bay Area. Only offer she got was NYC, though, so she's going to have to play the longer game to get back.twinkletoes16 wrote:But for CCN...are most gunning for east coast biglaw and so the few west coast placements are self-selecting/less competition? Do law firms/offices in the west coast (SF/SJ/SV/LA) want CCN kids or only B, S, UCLA, USC?
I think the conventional wisdom is is that B offers you the tradeoff of a better chance at CA employment but slightly worse chance at employment overall.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- goden
- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 1&t=192597twinkletoes16 wrote:As mentioned above, I'm fairly sure everyone who goes to b wants to stay in California mostly...or at least the dean has mentioned that people who didn't originally, after 3 years, decide west coast is the best coast and stay there. But for CCN...are most gunning for east coast biglaw and so the few west coast placements are self-selecting/less competition? Do law firms/offices in the west coast (SF/SJ/SV/LA) want CCN kids or only B, S, UCLA, USC?
These are the dumb things I speculate about while I sit and wait for a first acceptance. COME ON ANYBODY
This may be useful to you. Personally, I would take B over any school outside of HYS in a heartbeat. From what I've heard, B offers the best non-HYS chance at getting CA biglaw, and if you miss out on biglaw, you can interview at small and mid-sized CA firms that you otherwise would not have access to coming from CCN. I would only possibly take CCN > B if I was indifferent to working in NY vs. CA.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thank you SO much for this. I felt so guilty in my head for thinking that if I got a CCN and miraculously B, choosing B. I'm still glad I applied to CCN but I would only use it as scholarship leveraging for B, I'm fairly sure.goden wrote:http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 1&t=192597twinkletoes16 wrote:As mentioned above, I'm fairly sure everyone who goes to b wants to stay in California mostly...or at least the dean has mentioned that people who didn't originally, after 3 years, decide west coast is the best coast and stay there. But for CCN...are most gunning for east coast biglaw and so the few west coast placements are self-selecting/less competition? Do law firms/offices in the west coast (SF/SJ/SV/LA) want CCN kids or only B, S, UCLA, USC?
These are the dumb things I speculate about while I sit and wait for a first acceptance. COME ON ANYBODY
This may be useful to you. Personally, I would take B over any school outside of HYS in a heartbeat. From what I've heard, B offers the best non-HYS chance at getting CA biglaw, and if you miss out on biglaw, you can interview at small and mid-sized CA firms that you otherwise would not have access to coming from CCN. I would only possibly take CCN > B if I was indifferent to working in NY vs. CA.
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Just want to say this discussion has been really depressing for someone who's basically CA or bust but seems much more likely to get into CCN than B.
Why can't you just have NYU-style predictability, Cal??
ETA: Sorry for the pity-party, just had to get that off my chest.
Why can't you just have NYU-style predictability, Cal??
ETA: Sorry for the pity-party, just had to get that off my chest.
Last edited by Yukos on Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login