HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style Forum
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
*cricket*
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Haha, yeah this thread really died...FryBreadPower wrote:*cricket*
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 4:14 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
so has Harvard held more people this year then in years past
- amc987
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
That seems to be the common wisdom at the moment.ralph_pootawn wrote:so has Harvard held more people this year then in years past
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
You'd never know it from our thread...amc987 wrote:That seems to be the common wisdom at the moment.ralph_pootawn wrote:so has Harvard held more people this year then in years past
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
So...looks like we got some new Held friends today/this week.
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Hello, new friends!
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Nulli Secundus wrote:Hello, new friends!
Ooh ooh bring the fun picture back, but change it for hold time!
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
How about this one?
--ImageRemoved--
Since I am at work and have access to only a shitty upload service, here is the "subtitle" for the picture: What do you mean being held is not good? I feel great! U jelly?!
--ImageRemoved--
Since I am at work and have access to only a shitty upload service, here is the "subtitle" for the picture: What do you mean being held is not good? I feel great! U jelly?!
Last edited by Nulli Secundus on Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Yes, Nulli!
Fantastic!
Fantastic!
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
So, contacted the admissions office today to ask about sending a fifth LOR that is unsigned by the recommender, since the letter comes from a former supervisor now serving overseas, and it wouldn't be an easy task to reach him since he works on the.. Darker side of things in the Army and is hard to reach. They said no problems. Now, my real question is this. 2 weeks ago I sent in an LOCI, and this weekend while going over it looking for some ideas for a different LOCI, I noticed a fairly minor typo. I said "superior offices" instead of " superior officers." I am not 100% sure that one I sent in had that error, since I made the rookie mistake of keeping too many versions around, but I am about 75% sure that the mistake is on there. My current plan is to send in the LOR as my primary reason for correspondence, and also include the LOCI alongside and explan that I simply am not positive that their copy has the mistake, the very minor typo, but to request that they replace what I had with my most recent version so I can be certain they have the right one. Rookie mistake, yeah, but all my interaction wit the admissions offce leads me to believe the adcomm people are personable, and that t the end f the day, it will probably an office assistant that handles the actual appliance updates vice the dudes making the calls.
Foolish? And fwiw, if you are reading the LOCI quickly as I am sure they do due to the sheer volume of apps, it's pretty easy to miss. I just would appreciate any input, especially if you went through something similar. Besides, wtf else do I have to do after being held everywhere.
Foolish? And fwiw, if you are reading the LOCI quickly as I am sure they do due to the sheer volume of apps, it's pretty easy to miss. I just would appreciate any input, especially if you went through something similar. Besides, wtf else do I have to do after being held everywhere.
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I am not sure of the merits of sending one LOCI to Harvard, sending two is just over the top. If you are going for the OCD stalker image though, I will not be the one to stop you, less competition the better. (5th LoR is in this category as well).
(Fyi, Harvard, my interest still continues, as in the situation haven't changed one bit since last week. Except for a new cut I inflicted on my arm, I completed the letter H now with the cuts. this one bled profusely, and exactly in Harvard crimson color, I think this shows how much I want to attend. I will keep chiseling thy holy name to my arm, until I complete Harvard Law School in its glorious entirety)
(Fyi, Harvard, my interest still continues, as in the situation haven't changed one bit since last week. Except for a new cut I inflicted on my arm, I completed the letter H now with the cuts. this one bled profusely, and exactly in Harvard crimson color, I think this shows how much I want to attend. I will keep chiseling thy holy name to my arm, until I complete Harvard Law School in its glorious entirety)
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
maybe I wasnt clear. It isnt a new LOCI, it is one in which I acknowledge an error in the very same LOCI i previously submitted, and correct it. Why I have 5 LORs is because I have 2 academic and 2 work related.Having read them all, I think the 5th addresses some of the shortcomings in the 2nd work related LOR, because it is written for a differet kind of audience then the law school adcomms
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Already finished up the school crest. Gotta catch up brah!Nulli Secundus wrote:I am not sure of the merits of sending one LOCI to Harvard, sending two is just over the top. If you are going for the OCD stalker image though, I will not be the one to stop you, less competition the better. (5th LoR is in this category as well).
(Fyi, Harvard, my interest still continues, as in the situation haven't changed one bit since last week. Except for a new cut I inflicted on my arm, I completed the letter H now with the cuts. this one bled profusely, and exactly in Harvard crimson color, I think this shows how much I want to attend. I will keep chiseling thy holy name to my arm, until I complete Harvard Law School in its glorious entirety)
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I think I'd just leave it and not send the corrected one. If they read these things at all, I really would bet it's just to scan for things that actually strengthen your app, and so I doubt they'd even catch that mistake. Just my opinion though I can see arguments both ways.EMZE wrote:So, contacted the admissions office today to ask about sending a fifth LOR that is unsigned by the recommender, since the letter comes from a former supervisor now serving overseas, and it wouldn't be an easy task to reach him since he works on the.. Darker side of things in the Army and is hard to reach. They said no problems. Now, my real question is this. 2 weeks ago I sent in an LOCI, and this weekend while going over it looking for some ideas for a different LOCI, I noticed a fairly minor typo. I said "superior offices" instead of " superior officers." I am not 100% sure that one I sent in had that error, since I made the rookie mistake of keeping too many versions around, but I am about 75% sure that the mistake is on there. My current plan is to send in the LOR as my primary reason for correspondence, and also include the LOCI alongside and explan that I simply am not positive that their copy has the mistake, the very minor typo, but to request that they replace what I had with my most recent version so I can be certain they have the right one. Rookie mistake, yeah, but all my interaction wit the admissions offce leads me to believe the adcomm people are personable, and that t the end f the day, it will probably an office assistant that handles the actual appliance updates vice the dudes making the calls.
Foolish? And fwiw, if you are reading the LOCI quickly as I am sure they do due to the sheer volume of apps, it's pretty easy to miss. I just would appreciate any input, especially if you went through something similar. Besides, wtf else do I have to do after being held everywhere.
- larsoner
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:33 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I agree. Even if they do notice it, like you said, its a small typo. I doubt it would be the deciding factor. If you send a new one in, you will call attention to the mistake, which would otherwise probably go unnoticed. Also, I doubt they will look to see what the typo was, so if you send in a corrected LOCI, you may make it seem like it was a larger error, one that you desperately needed to hide (like Stanford instead of Harvard for example).seanPtheB wrote:I think I'd just leave it and not send the corrected one. If they read these things at all, I really would bet it's just to scan for things that actually strengthen your app, and so I doubt they'd even catch that mistake. Just my opinion though I can see arguments both ways.EMZE wrote:So, contacted the admissions office today to ask about sending a fifth LOR that is unsigned by the recommender, since the letter comes from a former supervisor now serving overseas, and it wouldn't be an easy task to reach him since he works on the.. Darker side of things in the Army and is hard to reach. They said no problems. Now, my real question is this. 2 weeks ago I sent in an LOCI, and this weekend while going over it looking for some ideas for a different LOCI, I noticed a fairly minor typo. I said "superior offices" instead of " superior officers." I am not 100% sure that one I sent in had that error, since I made the rookie mistake of keeping too many versions around, but I am about 75% sure that the mistake is on there. My current plan is to send in the LOR as my primary reason for correspondence, and also include the LOCI alongside and explan that I simply am not positive that their copy has the mistake, the very minor typo, but to request that they replace what I had with my most recent version so I can be certain they have the right one. Rookie mistake, yeah, but all my interaction wit the admissions offce leads me to believe the adcomm people are personable, and that t the end f the day, it will probably an office assistant that handles the actual appliance updates vice the dudes making the calls.
Foolish? And fwiw, if you are reading the LOCI quickly as I am sure they do due to the sheer volume of apps, it's pretty easy to miss. I just would appreciate any input, especially if you went through something similar. Besides, wtf else do I have to do after being held everywhere.
- Nulli Secundus
- Posts: 3175
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Well just /self if you did this anyway. The only good part of applying to only one school is zero chance of doing this kind of mistake.larsoner wrote: (like Stanford instead of Harvard for example).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- boosk
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:31 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
mickeyD wrote:boosk wrote:rotaxkarter wrote:For the newly held...MobyDick wrote:I thought it might be nice to gather some data about held applicants, so I made a a Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... NU5meEE6MQ
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kRqNU5meEE
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:31 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I am planning to send my LOCI and an additional LOR (3rd one). Does anyone know if I have to send 3rd LOR through LSAC or directly to HLS?
- boosk
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:31 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
I already had a 3rd one on LSAC that I never sent (unsure about its strength) during the original app process. When I got held I just shot it over through there and it popped up on my status checker within a day or two.EvelynS wrote:I am planning to send my LOCI and an additional LOR (3rd one). Does anyone know if I have to send 3rd LOR through LSAC or directly to HLS?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wphr
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:17 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Hi y'all. held today ...
we don't email anything directly to Harvard right? like LOCI and stuff?
they must be all sent by post?
we don't email anything directly to Harvard right? like LOCI and stuff?
they must be all sent by post?
- curiouscat
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Welcomewphr wrote:Hi y'all. held today ...
we don't email anything directly to Harvard right? like LOCI and stuff?
they must be all sent by post?
Yeah, they don't open an attachments over email.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:25 am
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Held, also complete in mid-December =/
Quick question: I sent updated fall semester grades to LSAC in January...do you think that Harvard would have already seen these, or should I resend them?
Quick question: I sent updated fall semester grades to LSAC in January...do you think that Harvard would have already seen these, or should I resend them?
- crooked
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:23 pm
Re: HELD @ HARVARD 2012 style
Welcome new holds! Sorry to the holds who didn't want to be holds and congrats to the holds who didn't think they had a chance to be holds.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login