UIUC 2015 Forum
-
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:56 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Oh what a scholarRdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
- kalede
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 4:59 am
Re: UIUC 2015
In via email today with a quarter scholarship!
- tennisballs
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:57 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Did everyone receive these e-mails at the exact same time?
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:03 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Very true. I am interested for sure, but as an OOS student, the thought of running up $160k is not too enticing. Hopefully they are willing to budge a bit. Regardless, it was good news for a Monday morning.Opie wrote:Remember as well that another advantage of Illinois is that they don't raise tuition on you while you're there. That can't be said for every law school.btw384 wrote:Accepted via email, $5k/year scholly with no stips. It was unexpected as I only applied a couple of weeks ago, but I am definitely excited about it. Hopefully I can negotiate that small scholly up a bit!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- givemea170
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:42 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Held via email as well. Im pretty new to the application process. What does held mean exactly? Is it better than being waitlisted or is it basically just a lukewarm rejection? Pretty disappointing as i thought my 171 lsat would get me at least in.
- YankeeFan2
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:53 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Good question about being held. I was held as well -- I think its basically a lukewarm rejection. I am not keeping my hopes up.givemea170 wrote:Held via email as well. Im pretty new to the application process. What does held mean exactly? Is it better than being waitlisted or is it basically just a lukewarm rejection? Pretty disappointing as i thought my 171 lsat would get me at least in.
- neeko
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
I would say its closer to a lukewarm waitlist. I'm held, too.YankeeFan2 wrote:Good question about being held. I was held as well -- I think its basically a lukewarm rejection. I am not keeping my hopes up.givemea170 wrote:Held via email as well. Im pretty new to the application process. What does held mean exactly? Is it better than being waitlisted or is it basically just a lukewarm rejection? Pretty disappointing as i thought my 171 lsat would get me at least in.
- YankeeFan2
- Posts: 284
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:53 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
So should I feel better that it is not a flat out rejection?neeko wrote:I would say its closer to a lukewarm waitlist. I'm held, too.YankeeFan2 wrote:Good question about being held. I was held as well -- I think its basically a lukewarm rejection. I am not keeping my hopes up.givemea170 wrote:Held via email as well. Im pretty new to the application process. What does held mean exactly? Is it better than being waitlisted or is it basically just a lukewarm rejection? Pretty disappointing as i thought my 171 lsat would get me at least in.
- neeko
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Definitely.YankeeFan2 wrote:So should I feel better that it is not a flat out rejection?neeko wrote:I would say its closer to a lukewarm waitlist. I'm held, too.YankeeFan2 wrote:Good question about being held. I was held as well -- I think its basically a lukewarm rejection. I am not keeping my hopes up.givemea170 wrote:Held via email as well. Im pretty new to the application process. What does held mean exactly? Is it better than being waitlisted or is it basically just a lukewarm rejection? Pretty disappointing as i thought my 171 lsat would get me at least in.
- blurbz
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:43 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Out of curiosity, who taught the class you sat in on?Rdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
- jrthor10
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:33 am
Re: UIUC 2015
In with a quarter scholarship via e-mail.
Looking at LSN two things seem clear to me: One apps are down this year bc of the scandal. Two, UIUC seems to either dramatically favor high gpa's to high lsat's for scholarships or 2, the school is holding back $$ from candidates they don't think will attend.
TBH I was a little surprised with my stats that I only got a 1/4 scholly when it seems clear to everyone the school is going to have a weird cycle. Anybody else have thoughts on this?
Looking at LSN two things seem clear to me: One apps are down this year bc of the scandal. Two, UIUC seems to either dramatically favor high gpa's to high lsat's for scholarships or 2, the school is holding back $$ from candidates they don't think will attend.
TBH I was a little surprised with my stats that I only got a 1/4 scholly when it seems clear to everyone the school is going to have a weird cycle. Anybody else have thoughts on this?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kennethellenparcell
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am
Re: UIUC 2015
For what it's worth, I have a 175+ LSAT and approximately the same GPA as you and I'm in with 1/2 scholly.
jrthor10 wrote:In with a quarter scholarship via e-mail.
Looking at LSN two things seem clear to me: One apps are down this year bc of the scandal. Two, UIUC seems to either dramatically favor high gpa's to high lsat's for scholarships or 2, the school is holding back $$ from candidates they don't think will attend.
TBH I was a little surprised with my stats that I only got a 1/4 scholly when it seems clear to everyone the school is going to have a weird cycle. Anybody else have thoughts on this?
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
You were unimpressed with the visit but disappointed not to get in?Rdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
What was wrong with the class out of curiosity?
-
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
So was everybody that was held today a splitter? I am confused why a "hold"? Maybe to get people who are not really planning on UofI to withdraw their applications for YP?
I mean, it’s the end of January. You would think they know at least the basic GPA/LSAT stats of everybody who was going to apply by now…
I mean, it’s the end of January. You would think they know at least the basic GPA/LSAT stats of everybody who was going to apply by now…
- Opie
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:27 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Could be a combination of the two. Maybe they do know the basic numbers but the margin is tight and they need to shore it up a little more.STLMizzou wrote:So was everybody that was held today a splitter? I am confused why a "hold"? Maybe to get people who are not really planning on UofI to withdraw their applications for YP?
I mean, it’s the end of January. You would think they know at least the basic GPA/LSAT stats of everybody who was going to apply by now…
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:20 am
Re: UIUC 2015
Precisely. It is saddening to be held at a school that was not that impressive, as it may be a sign of things to come from schools that would potentially be more impressive.Ludovico Technique wrote:You were unimpressed with the visit but disappointed not to get in?Rdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
What was wrong with the class out of curiosity?
The class was not engaging. The professor was constantly pacing and looking at the walls. The questions students were asked were easy to answer (even for someone who had not read the material and has not studied law) but the answers provided by the students were consistently off the mark and sometimes just plain wrong. The atmosphere was just not what I had expected, as many students immediately closed their books upon being informed that they were not one of the two students chosen for that period. Additionally, the students directly in front of me were instant messaging the whole time. While I understand that every class will inevitably have its share of disengaged students, the number of students who appeared to "check out" within the first five minutes of class was surprising.
I should add, though, that I was able to interact with a few 2L students after my visit, and they appeared to be much more intelligent and interested in their studies than the students in the class I sat in on. So the class I witnessed could very well have been an anomaly.
- Opie
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:27 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
I think your expectations of what law school is like might be a little off.Rdubs wrote:Precisely. It is saddening to be held at a school that was not that impressive, as it may be a sign of things to come from schools that would potentially be more impressive.Ludovico Technique wrote:You were unimpressed with the visit but disappointed not to get in?Rdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
What was wrong with the class out of curiosity?
The class was not engaging. The professor was constantly pacing and looking at the walls. The questions students were asked were easy to answer (even for someone who had not read the material and has not studied law) but the answers provided by the students were consistently off the mark and sometimes just plain wrong. The atmosphere was just not what I had expected, as many students immediately closed their books upon being informed that they were not one of the two students chosen for that period. Additionally, the students directly in front of me were instant messaging the whole time. While I understand that every class will inevitably have its share of disengaged students, the number of students who appeared to "check out" within the first five minutes of class was surprising.
I should add, though, that I was able to interact with a few 2L students after my visit, and they appeared to be much more intelligent and interested in their studies than the students in the class I sat in on. So the class I witnessed could very well have been an anomaly.
- Ludo!
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:22 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
You sound like a huge douche, please don't come to IllinoisRdubs wrote:Precisely. It is saddening to be held at a school that was not that impressive, as it may be a sign of things to come from schools that would potentially be more impressive.Ludovico Technique wrote:You were unimpressed with the visit but disappointed not to get in?Rdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
What was wrong with the class out of curiosity?
The class was not engaging. The professor was constantly pacing and looking at the walls. The questions students were asked were easy to answer (even for someone who had not read the material and has not studied law) but the answers provided by the students were consistently off the mark and sometimes just plain wrong. The atmosphere was just not what I had expected, as many students immediately closed their books upon being informed that they were not one of the two students chosen for that period. Additionally, the students directly in front of me were instant messaging the whole time. While I understand that every class will inevitably have its share of disengaged students, the number of students who appeared to "check out" within the first five minutes of class was surprising.
I should add, though, that I was able to interact with a few 2L students after my visit, and they appeared to be much more intelligent and interested in their studies than the students in the class I sat in on. So the class I witnessed could very well have been an anomaly.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tmon
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
Under review. How long has the review process taken for recent decisions? Seems like about a month on LSN?
- hadisious
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am
Re: UIUC 2015
This isn't correct. When held at UIUC you can still be rejected, unlike a traditional waitlist. You can also be waitlisted, which is like every other waitlist.Gail wrote:Held = WL
-
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:56 pm
Re: UIUC 2015
OH WHAT A SCHOLARRdubs wrote:Precisely. It is saddening to be held at a school that was not that impressive, as it may be a sign of things to come from schools that would potentially be more impressive.Ludovico Technique wrote:You were unimpressed with the visit but disappointed not to get in?Rdubs wrote:Held via email..... Quite disappointing - as a recent visit left me far from impressed... Perhaps the class I sat in on was not on par with the rest of what Illinois offers, but still....
What was wrong with the class out of curiosity?
The class was not engaging. The professor was constantly pacing and looking at the walls. The questions students were asked were easy to answer (even for someone who had not read the material and has not studied law) but the answers provided by the students were consistently off the mark and sometimes just plain wrong. The atmosphere was just not what I had expected, as many students immediately closed their books upon being informed that they were not one of the two students chosen for that period. Additionally, the students directly in front of me were instant messaging the whole time. While I understand that every class will inevitably have its share of disengaged students, the number of students who appeared to "check out" within the first five minutes of class was surprising.
I should add, though, that I was able to interact with a few 2L students after my visit, and they appeared to be much more intelligent and interested in their studies than the students in the class I sat in on. So the class I witnessed could very well have been an anomaly.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login