Hmm, well, I think texas is known to negotiate some, but I don't know if this cut off applies to this.imadude wrote:So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.PigBodine wrote:I just talked with the financial aid office, and they were able to tell me the exact gpa/lsat cutoff point at which they start offering scholarships. I assumed that it wasn't a holistic, 'he seems like a 78k kind of guy' sort of thing, but I was surprised that, number one, there's no leeway (3.59/180 gets no-offered), and number two, that they were so open about where it is. It's 3.6/168 for non-URMs, by the way.
Texas 2011-2012 Applicants Forum
- eaper
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:59 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
That's what they told me, but it might be a good idea to take it with a grain of salt. A lot of schools, when you request a fee waiver, will say that they don't give merit-based fee waivers out, period. Except that a lot of times, these schools do. They just give them to stronger candidates. So maybe it's just a starting point in that they're obligated to give you a scholarship if you meet that requirement, unless they happen to like your face. Or that's the brightline for the standard, merit-based aid, but they have separate funds that they give out for 'leadership,' or something, like Michigan.imadude wrote:So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.PigBodine wrote:I just talked with the financial aid office, and they were able to tell me the exact gpa/lsat cutoff point at which they start offering scholarships. I assumed that it wasn't a holistic, 'he seems like a 78k kind of guy' sort of thing, but I was surprised that, number one, there's no leeway (3.59/180 gets no-offered), and number two, that they were so open about where it is. It's 3.6/168 for non-URMs, by the way.
Bottom line, though, I'd be expecting to get something if you're 3.6/168, and expecting sticker if you're not.
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:59 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
They'll consider meeting scholarship offers from similarly ranked schools, but I think they're mostly going to play hardball otherwise. They didn't seem the slightest bit interested that I couldn't possibly take UT at sticker over NYU or Columbia, even though I'm a Texas resident and UT undergrad. I get the feeling that they have strict guidelines for exactly what kind of scholarships they're allowed to offer, and the type of numbers they're allowed to offer them to.eaper wrote:Hmm, well, I think texas is known to negotiate some, but I don't know if this cut off applies to this.imadude wrote:So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.PigBodine wrote:I just talked with the financial aid office, and they were able to tell me the exact gpa/lsat cutoff point at which they start offering scholarships. I assumed that it wasn't a holistic, 'he seems like a 78k kind of guy' sort of thing, but I was surprised that, number one, there's no leeway (3.59/180 gets no-offered), and number two, that they were so open about where it is. It's 3.6/168 for non-URMs, by the way.
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 9:27 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Missed the phone call!! Didn't check my voicemail until now, but hey! I'm in!!
Good luck to everyone on the Wait List and those still waiting to hear back.
Good luck to everyone on the Wait List and those still waiting to hear back.
- Greenandgold
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Found someone on LSN who might beg to differ... http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jennicPigBodine wrote:They'll consider meeting scholarship offers from similarly ranked schools, but I think they're mostly going to play hardball otherwise. They didn't seem the slightest bit interested that I couldn't possibly take UT at sticker over NYU or Columbia, even though I'm a Texas resident and UT undergrad. I get the feeling that they have strict guidelines for exactly what kind of scholarships they're allowed to offer, and the type of numbers they're allowed to offer them to.eaper wrote:Hmm, well, I think texas is known to negotiate some, but I don't know if this cut off applies to this.imadude wrote:So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.PigBodine wrote:I just talked with the financial aid office, and they were able to tell me the exact gpa/lsat cutoff point at which they start offering scholarships. I assumed that it wasn't a holistic, 'he seems like a 78k kind of guy' sort of thing, but I was surprised that, number one, there's no leeway (3.59/180 gets no-offered), and number two, that they were so open about where it is. It's 3.6/168 for non-URMs, by the way.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:59 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
That just looks like they made up the difference between IS and OOS, which, I think, gets done differently than pure merit aid. Again, though, I'm just repeating what I heard. I already suggested a lot of reasons why you might want to take it with a grian of salt.Greenandgold wrote: Found someone on LSN who might beg to differ... http://lawschoolnumbers.com/jennic
- Greenandgold
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Sorry, I didn't mean to sound like I didn't believe you. Seeing as how that was the only person on LSN who didn't fit within those cutoffs it seems like you're right. It's just frustrating because with a good scholarship I would have been very likely to choose to go to UT, but I don't see how I can justify it at sticker, being in at a T6 already.
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Just got rejected on a Saturday morning that's kind of low, but at least I can happily carry on my personal vendetta against UT.
-
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:59 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Haha, right on. Obviously, I hope I'm wrong. If anyone gets anything outside that zone, I'll definitely be the first one to congratulate themGreenandgold wrote:Sorry, I didn't mean to sound like I didn't believe you. Seeing as how that was the only person on LSN who didn't fit within those cutoffs it seems like you're right. It's just frustrating because with a good scholarship I would have been very likely to choose to go to UT, but I don't see how I can justify it at sticker, being in at a T6 already.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
I'm 168, 3.8 and only got 21k... At least it is something, but I would prefer morePigBodine wrote:That's what they told me, but it might be a good idea to take it with a grain of salt. A lot of schools, when you request a fee waiver, will say that they don't give merit-based fee waivers out, period. Except that a lot of times, these schools do. They just give them to stronger candidates. So maybe it's just a starting point in that they're obligated to give you a scholarship if you meet that requirement, unless they happen to like your face. Or that's the brightline for the standard, merit-based aid, but they have separate funds that they give out for 'leadership,' or something, like Michigan.imadude wrote:So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.PigBodine wrote:I just talked with the financial aid office, and they were able to tell me the exact gpa/lsat cutoff point at which they start offering scholarships. I assumed that it wasn't a holistic, 'he seems like a 78k kind of guy' sort of thing, but I was surprised that, number one, there's no leeway (3.59/180 gets no-offered), and number two, that they were so open about where it is. It's 3.6/168 for non-URMs, by the way.
Bottom line, though, I'd be expecting to get something if you're 3.6/168, and expecting sticker if you're not.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
I think everyone would prefer more no matter what they got...msblaw89 wrote:I'm 168, 3.8 and only got 21k... At least it is something, but I would prefer morePigBodine wrote:That's what they told me, but it might be a good idea to take it with a grain of salt. A lot of schools, when you request a fee waiver, will say that they don't give merit-based fee waivers out, period. Except that a lot of times, these schools do. They just give them to stronger candidates. So maybe it's just a starting point in that they're obligated to give you a scholarship if you meet that requirement, unless they happen to like your face. Or that's the brightline for the standard, merit-based aid, but they have separate funds that they give out for 'leadership,' or something, like Michigan.imadude wrote:So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.PigBodine wrote:I just talked with the financial aid office, and they were able to tell me the exact gpa/lsat cutoff point at which they start offering scholarships. I assumed that it wasn't a holistic, 'he seems like a 78k kind of guy' sort of thing, but I was surprised that, number one, there's no leeway (3.59/180 gets no-offered), and number two, that they were so open about where it is. It's 3.6/168 for non-URMs, by the way.
Bottom line, though, I'd be expecting to get something if you're 3.6/168, and expecting sticker if you're not.
- eaper
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
lolol +1ASAP wrote:I think everyone would prefer more no matter what they got...msblaw89 wrote:I'm 168, 3.8 and only got 21k... At least it is something, but I would prefer morePigBodine wrote:That's what they told me, but it might be a good idea to take it with a grain of salt. A lot of schools, when you request a fee waiver, will say that they don't give merit-based fee waivers out, period. Except that a lot of times, these schools do. They just give them to stronger candidates. So maybe it's just a starting point in that they're obligated to give you a scholarship if you meet that requirement, unless they happen to like your face. Or that's the brightline for the standard, merit-based aid, but they have separate funds that they give out for 'leadership,' or something, like Michigan.imadude wrote: So if you have a 167 does that mean you'll never get a dime, even after negotiation? Im 3.8 Gpa so that limit seems super arbitrary, and kind of unfair. Oh well.
Bottom line, though, I'd be expecting to get something if you're 3.6/168, and expecting sticker if you're not.
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 6:03 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Dinged. The 2 AM email on a Sunday wasn't desirable.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Anyone looking for a place to live yet? I have a rental property that currently has law students in it, very nice. New real hardwood floors, landscaped back yard with a pool and large decks, and brand new high-end appliances. I could put you in touch with the current tenants if you'd like to talk about commute times. I used to live there and I worked downtown, which was another two miles on the drive, and I could get from my garage to work in 12-15 minutes. Can be shorter depending on the traffic, and there is also a bus route nearby the house that takes you very close to the law school..
House has three bedrooms and two bathrooms. I'm hoping to move the rent up just slightly to $2100 or $2200 for the whole place. It's still a really great price for what you get-- the renovations on the home that were completed 8 months ago ran around 30k. Maybe something like $800 for the large master w/bath, and $700 for the other two rooms. House is near the Dell Children's Hospital/new businesses in that area for Austinites wanting to get a feel for the location. Please PM me and I'll email you with pics, other details, and answer any questions you might have.
I'll be back in Austin to show the house from March 24th-28th. If it doesn't rent I can arrange showings up through early May.
Thanks.
House has three bedrooms and two bathrooms. I'm hoping to move the rent up just slightly to $2100 or $2200 for the whole place. It's still a really great price for what you get-- the renovations on the home that were completed 8 months ago ran around 30k. Maybe something like $800 for the large master w/bath, and $700 for the other two rooms. House is near the Dell Children's Hospital/new businesses in that area for Austinites wanting to get a feel for the location. Please PM me and I'll email you with pics, other details, and answer any questions you might have.
I'll be back in Austin to show the house from March 24th-28th. If it doesn't rent I can arrange showings up through early May.
Thanks.
- cch24
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Got a nice call from a 2L today. He had some pretty impressive summer jobs lined up and he's out of state like me so that was comforting. Going to visit in a couple weeks because I can't make ASW. Excited!
- Magnifique1908
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:46 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Has anyone received word of a travel scholarship/stipend yet?
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:52 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Waitlisted today via email.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:50 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Accepted today. I was shocked... but really excited!
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:55 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Just got a call, and "a scholarship offer will be arriving next week"! Yesssssss
- eaper
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Grats!kingofspain wrote:Just got a call, and "a scholarship offer will be arriving next week"! Yesssssss
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
No, but I would like to have one in order to attend ASW. Would this question be best directed towards fin aid?Magnifique1908 wrote:Has anyone received word of a travel scholarship/stipend yet?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Magnifique1908
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:46 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Dean Ingram posted about it on FB and said individual students would be notified. Maybe ask admissions when they plan to start notifications?msblaw89 wrote:No, but I would like to have one in order to attend ASW. Would this question be best directed towards fin aid?Magnifique1908 wrote:Has anyone received word of a travel scholarship/stipend yet?
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Also, is UCLA a peer school to UT?
- eaper
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
I would think so. I would also throw GTown and Vandy in as peer schools. But dats just memsblaw89 wrote:Also, is UCLA a peer school to UT?
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
I know that UT will "match" peer school merit offers so I am currently seeing how much I can squeeze out of its peerseaper wrote:I would think so. I would also throw GTown and Vandy in as peer schools. But dats just memsblaw89 wrote:Also, is UCLA a peer school to UT?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login