+3Real Madrid wrote:The ironic thing is that they're trying so hard to boost those medians up significantly (and thus stay in the T14) that they're going to end up torpedoing their yield rate (another factor in USNWR rankings) because most people they've accepted will be matriculating at better schools.
Texas 2011-2012 Applicants Forum
- gavinstevens
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 6:17 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:20 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Held via email at 5 AM = / Also, I'm new to all of this.... what does "oos" mean?
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Rdubs wrote:Held via email at 5 AM = / Also, I'm new to all of this.... what does "oos" mean?
Out of state.
I'm still trying to figure Texas out. 3.5, 168, in state, held. The way they're going I'm thinking I'm getting rejected in April.
- eaper
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Have hope. My numbers were only a touch higher than yours and I still got in. You can do it as well!franklyscarlet wrote: I'm still trying to figure Texas out. 3.5, 168, in state, held. The way they're going I'm thinking I'm getting rejected in April.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:49 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
franklyscarlet wrote:Rdubs wrote:Held via email at 5 AM = / Also, I'm new to all of this.... what does "oos" mean?
Out of state.
I'm still trying to figure Texas out. 3.5, 168, in state, held. The way they're going I'm thinking I'm getting rejected in April.
I'm the same except a 3.6. I wasn't held this morning and feel like a rejection is coming Thursday or Friday morning.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Were you IS or OOS?eaper wrote:franklyscarlet wrote: I'm still trying to figure Texas out. 3.5, 168, in state, held. The way they're going I'm thinking I'm getting rejected in April.
Have hope. My numbers were only a touch higher than yours and I still got in. You can do it as well!
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:31 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Could just be because they have no idea what their matriculation rates will be, so they're holding a lot of people to see if they can be as selective as they apparently want to be.franklyscarlet wrote:Rdubs wrote:Held via email at 5 AM = / Also, I'm new to all of this.... what does "oos" mean?
Out of state.
I'm still trying to figure Texas out. 3.5, 168, in state, held. The way they're going I'm thinking I'm getting rejected in April.
-
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
I would be optimistic if I got held/waitlisted. It seems like they're getting really aggressive with their medians, trying to pass or stay tied with Georgetown. If you look at who has been accepted/rejected, it looks more like Duke, Michigan, UVA maybe, etc. As others have said this may lead to them having poor matriculation and thus letting a lot of people in off the waitlist.
Who knows though, Texas is a great school on the way up. Best of luck to everyone.
Who knows though, Texas is a great school on the way up. Best of luck to everyone.
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 12:21 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
They might catch up to Cornell, but there's no way their median LSAT is gonna go up 3 points (i.e. to match Georgetown) in one cycle, despite what they may think.bobbyh1919 wrote:I would be optimistic if I got held/waitlisted. It seems like they're getting really aggressive with their medians, trying to pass or stay tied with Georgetown. If you look at who has been accepted/rejected, it looks more like Duke, Michigan, UVA maybe, etc. As others have said this may lead to them having poor matriculation and thus letting a lot of people in off the waitlist.
Who knows though, Texas is a great school on the way up. Best of luck to everyone.
-
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Right now they're tied with Georgetown for overall ranking (I forget what value they each had). They won't catch these other schools in medians in one cycle, but the fact that they can be tied with GTown and have much lower medians means that they're perceived to be stronger in the other factors that go into the overall ranking.Real Madrid wrote:They might catch up to Cornell, but there's no way their median LSAT is gonna go up 3 points (i.e. to match Georgetown) in one cycle, despite what they may think.bobbyh1919 wrote:I would be optimistic if I got held/waitlisted. It seems like they're getting really aggressive with their medians, trying to pass or stay tied with Georgetown. If you look at who has been accepted/rejected, it looks more like Duke, Michigan, UVA maybe, etc. As others have said this may lead to them having poor matriculation and thus letting a lot of people in off the waitlist.
Who knows though, Texas is a great school on the way up. Best of luck to everyone.
- paul34
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
.
Last edited by paul34 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
what were your numbers again (IIRC they were similar to mine is why I'm asking lol)paul34 wrote:Rejected via early morning e-mail. I guess my GPA wasn't cool enough for the club.
Good luck to everyone else.
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:50 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Sorry TLS. I'm not equipped with all the lingo. What does "in for ASW" mean?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Admitted students weekenducbkenn wrote:Sorry TLS. I'm not equipped with all the lingo. What does "in for ASW" mean?
- paul34
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:37 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
.
Last edited by paul34 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Magnifique1908
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 11:46 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
No other ice cream exists.....chem wrote:Most people I talk to when I lived in Cincinnati would talk about Texas like it was the promised land.franklyscarlet wrote:Cincinnati people? Ran here.
Going to split our new found community by throwing out subjective opinions
Skyline>Goldstar
Larosas> All other pizza
Graeters> all other ice cream
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
I dunno I don't think UT is going solely on numbers. I'm OOS and a non URM and ppl with way higher numbers than me were rejected but I was accepted... there has to be other factors
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Ok this is going to sound braggy and awful but if other factors are being considered, Texas why you no want an in-state Hispanic tfa?msblaw89 wrote:I dunno I don't think UT is going solely on numbers. I'm OOS and a non URM and ppl with way higher numbers than me were rejected but I was accepted... there has to be other factors
- butchcassidy
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
why you talking like you got rejected? you'll get infranklyscarlet wrote:Ok this is going to sound braggy and awful but if other factors are being considered, Texas why you no want an in-state Hispanic tfa?msblaw89 wrote:I dunno I don't think UT is going solely on numbers. I'm OOS and a non URM and ppl with way higher numbers than me were rejected but I was accepted... there has to be other factors
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Yes you will Scarlet!
- franklyscarlet
- Posts: 2918
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:16 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Thanks :-/ I'm just being a grumpy bear.butchcassidy wrote:why you talking like you got rejected? you'll get infranklyscarlet wrote:Ok this is going to sound braggy and awful but if other factors are being considered, Texas why you no want an in-state Hispanic tfa?msblaw89 wrote:I dunno I don't think UT is going solely on numbers. I'm OOS and a non URM and ppl with way higher numbers than me were rejected but I was accepted... there has to be other factors
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
What sucks for us and what we have to consider... there is the human element.
Different people reviewed by different adcomms, adcomms in different moods, etc...
Obviously not usually a huge factor, but I can pretty much guarantee if a ls was given the exact same applicants on back to back years there would be a couple people who would have a different decision because of these factors
Different people reviewed by different adcomms, adcomms in different moods, etc...
Obviously not usually a huge factor, but I can pretty much guarantee if a ls was given the exact same applicants on back to back years there would be a couple people who would have a different decision because of these factors
- 6thbackstreetboy
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:57 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Just got a call from UT. I couldn't answer it because I'm in class. They left a voicemail though. I can't check for another hour and I really want to see what they said. Does this mean I may be in, or do they call to reject and WL you too?
- butchcassidy
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:33 pm
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
think this means your in. also, bathroom break? jesus i couldn't wait6thbackstreetboy wrote:Just got a call from UT. I couldn't answer it because I'm in class. They left a voicemail though. I can't check for another hour and I really want to see what they said. Does this mean I may be in, or do they call to reject and WL you too?
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Texas 2011-2012 Applicants
Yea, this definitely sounds like a time in which you have to go to the "Restroom"butchcassidy wrote:think this means your in. also, bathroom break? jesus i couldn't wait6thbackstreetboy wrote:Just got a call from UT. I couldn't answer it because I'm in class. They left a voicemail though. I can't check for another hour and I really want to see what they said. Does this mean I may be in, or do they call to reject and WL you too?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login