Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- pupshaw
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Should we assume that acceptances are done for today?
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also, are we still thinking it was a "wave?" Or would this be considered just a few acceptances?cerealdan wrote:Should we assume that acceptances are done for today?
- KevinP
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
UR 11/22 and still no word.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:35 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Deleted.
Last edited by Virgil777 on Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Aspen
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:38 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I came to the East Coast for a legal job but miss California like crazy. I know I want to eventually settle in California so being able to just start my life there would be great. Also, it would be amazing to be a student at Berkeley. Just the whole feel and vibe of the campus (even at Boalt Hall) is something I've never experienced before. Plus, I've never met anyone who goes there or went there and regretted it.UtilityMonster wrote:I was actually leaning towards UPenn over Berkeley. Why do you prefer Berkeley?Aspen wrote:I've been under review since 10/19. I wish I could at least have a rough time frame on when I'd hear back . I've gotten into UVA and UPenn so far but Berkeley has been my #1 choice for the longest time.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KevinP
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That's true. I'm also thankful I survived the last rejection batchVirgil777 wrote:+1. But hey, it's only 3pm here on the West coast, so we have two more hours where they will maybe send a couple more emails.KevinP wrote:UR 11/22 and still no word.
- brettashley
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:56 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Got in by email this morning. UR 12/22. 3.9/171. Hope that helps.
This is the first school I've heard from. It feels unreal. Good luck, everyone!
This is the first school I've heard from. It feels unreal. Good luck, everyone!
- smokeylarue
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
congrats to all you admits! Hopefully meet some of you guys at the ASW!
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Correct me if I am wrong, but it would appear most of the acceptances reported to this point have ben individuals with great numbers. I haven't compiled them, but based on what I think we've seen so far, almost all are really well above the medians if not 75% stats. Not surprising since most schools seem especially eager this cycle to solidify their medians early on before moving through the rest of the applicants.
We can anticipate that whole committee review deal within the month if they continue with their timeline from last year. I think it will be during that process when those of us who are more on the iffy side see some correspondence/consideration.
Also, since a lot of admits went out today, think there will be a wave of rejections before the end of the week?
We can anticipate that whole committee review deal within the month if they continue with their timeline from last year. I think it will be during that process when those of us who are more on the iffy side see some correspondence/consideration.
Also, since a lot of admits went out today, think there will be a wave of rejections before the end of the week?
- Zelda
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Why won't Berkeley just reject or waitlist me already. I just want my decision!!! 11/22 UR.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
On LSN last cycle there was a wave of admits on the 18th and 19th followed by rejection on the 20th and 21stEMZE wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but it would appear most of the acceptances reported to this point have ben individuals with great numbers. I haven't compiled them, but based on what I think we've seen so far, almost all are really well above the medians if not 75% stats. Not surprising since most schools seem especially eager this cycle to solidify their medians early on before moving through the rest of the applicants.
We can anticipate that whole committee review deal within the month if they continue with their timeline from last year. I think it will be during that process when those of us who are more on the iffy side see some correspondence/consideration.
Also, since a lot of admits went out today, think there will be a wave of rejections before the end of the week?
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Berkeley, Penn and Columbia are the only schools I would have to weight out against Michigan and it's only out of convenience for being in a city but they're taking way too long to get back to me. I kind of just would rather get rejected so I could tell my husband we're out of luck and have to go to A2 and there are no other options.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:53 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ditto. Ditto. I'm telling my partner just plan on Michigan for now but it's tough because I also want the convenience of a city for both of our sake.JoeMo wrote:Berkeley, Penn and Columbia are the only schools I would have to weight out against Michigan and it's only out of convenience for being in a city but they're taking way too long to get back to me. I kind of just would rather get rejected so I could tell my husband we're out of luck and have to go to A2 and there are no other options.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- catwomangirl
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So do you guys think we're due for more acceptances today?
I think there are fewer at this point than last year (through my unscientific lsn counting-by-staring-at-the-screen method).
I think there are fewer at this point than last year (through my unscientific lsn counting-by-staring-at-the-screen method).
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I certainly hope so ... based on LSN last cycle there were two days back t back of acceptancescatwomangirl wrote:So do you guys think we're due for more acceptances today?
I think there are fewer at this point than last year (through my unscientific lsn counting-by-staring-at-the-screen method).
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I haven't heard back from M, V, P, or B. I hope I don't get stonewalled. C'monnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn, Berk!
- catwomangirl
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Okay let's start a betting pool.
I'm calling 2:32 (because I like multiples of 4).
I'm calling 2:32 (because I like multiples of 4).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
We're getting in at 3:33 Pacific. Yeah, I went to 6; I went there.catwomangirl wrote:Okay let's start a betting pool.
I'm calling 2:32 (because I like multiples of 4).
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 2:16 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Campagnolo wrote:We're getting in at 3:33 Pacific. Yeah, I went to 6; I went there.catwomangirl wrote:Okay let's start a betting pool.
I'm calling 2:32 (because I like multiples of 4).
The 6th Sense.
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Plus, three is the first number. One is the unit, two the dyad.
In conclusion, Three Dog Night can suck it. One isn't the loneliest number: it isn't a number at all!
Q.E.D.
PS I'm sorry.
In conclusion, Three Dog Night can suck it. One isn't the loneliest number: it isn't a number at all!
Q.E.D.
PS I'm sorry.
- pupshaw
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Campagnolo wrote:Plus, three is the first number. One is the unit, two the dyad.
In conclusion, Three Dog Night can suck it. One isn't the loneliest number: it isn't a number at all!
Q.E.D.
PS I'm sorry.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- catwomangirl
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
cerealdan wrote:Campagnolo wrote:Plus, three is the first number. One is the unit, two the dyad.
In conclusion, Three Dog Night can suck it. One isn't the loneliest number: it isn't a number at all!
Q.E.D.
PS I'm sorry.
Is he betting on 3:12?
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 2:16 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
TLS: Ever since the LSAT scores, every time we've tried to guess the exact time of the scores/decision emails, they end up coming out much later than we anticipated or sometimes on a much later date.
Following last year's cycle to the detail is hardly a strong precedent for us to be wasting all day on here. We're all fairly smart people, shouldn't we be using our critical abilities on abstract dilemmas and art before law school?
Nahhhhh.
Following last year's cycle to the detail is hardly a strong precedent for us to be wasting all day on here. We're all fairly smart people, shouldn't we be using our critical abilities on abstract dilemmas and art before law school?
Nahhhhh.
- Campagnolo
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Look, I said I was sorry! I promise not to whip out random archaic math facts if we go to school together! Or, for that matter, bring up 3 Dog Night.
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The Michigan job market sucks, it's scary.jpal13 wrote:Ditto. Ditto. I'm telling my partner just plan on Michigan for now but it's tough because I also want the convenience of a city for both of our sake.JoeMo wrote:Berkeley, Penn and Columbia are the only schools I would have to weight out against Michigan and it's only out of convenience for being in a city but they're taking way too long to get back to me. I kind of just would rather get rejected so I could tell my husband we're out of luck and have to go to A2 and there are no other options.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login