Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Mal Reynolds » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:45 am

jeninamillion wrote:
jpal13 wrote:
smokeylarue wrote:Holy shit is this a misprint? I just received the admissions packet, in the booklet it has data for this year's entering class profile. It says the class is 38% men, 62% women. Not that I'm complaining or anything as a man, but is this true? I thought pretty much all the law schools were majority male.
That is a crazy statistic.... Really crazy
Eh. Berkeley undergrad is like 45% Asian (and more like 80% in the engineering majors). It likes to be weird/special.
This is so blatantly racist I hope it's sarcastic.

jeninamillion

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 2:17 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jeninamillion » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:58 am

Mal Reynolds wrote:
jeninamillion wrote:
jpal13 wrote:
smokeylarue wrote:Holy shit is this a misprint? I just received the admissions packet, in the booklet it has data for this year's entering class profile. It says the class is 38% men, 62% women. Not that I'm complaining or anything as a man, but is this true? I thought pretty much all the law schools were majority male.
That is a crazy statistic.... Really crazy
Eh. Berkeley undergrad is like 45% Asian (and more like 80% in the engineering majors). It likes to be weird/special.
This is so blatantly racist I hope it's sarcastic.
Yeah, but it's some what true. I think the first stat is substantiated by their official materials, and the second is from personal experience from taking classes that were also reqs for engineering students.

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Mal Reynolds » Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:07 am

Lol. I'm not arguing about the demographics of Berkeley. I'm sure you're not lying, nor is that racist. What's racist is the general disappointment and implication that Berkeley is weird because of its ethnic makeup. So again, Lolz.

User avatar
smokeylarue

Silver
Posts: 611
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by smokeylarue » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:21 am

LOL yeah all the UC schools have a similar percentages of Asians because they can't do affirmative action and since Asians have the best grades and test scores, thats your result. Its not strange at all for Berkeley or California, its common.

Edit: this is only in regards to their undergraduate admissions, pretty sure the grad schools are not like this
Last edited by smokeylarue on Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

rachelwang712

Bronze
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:07 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by rachelwang712 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:29 am

FYI, I am a Chinese applicant. (I did my undergrad in a Chinese univ.) UC schools are famous for being friendly with Chinese students no matter which major they are studying. They typically admit a large number of applicants with a Chinese undergrad degree each year.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


jpal13

Bronze
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:53 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jpal13 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:51 am

rachelwang712 wrote:FYI, I am a Chinese applicant. (I did my undergrad in a Chinese univ.) UC schools are famous for being friendly with Chinese students no matter which major they are studying. They typically admit a large number of applicants with a Chinese undergrad degree each year.

Still none of this explains Why they favor women so much. That's a big disparity between men and women. While I like the ratio, I am worried I will be discriminated against as a man. I mean 60/40! Are they trying to be Jurassic Park?

thecactus

New
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:46 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by thecactus » Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:22 am

jpal13 wrote:Still none of this explains Why they favor women so much. That's a big disparity between men and women. While I like the ratio, I am worried I will be discriminated against as a man. I mean 60/40! Are they trying to be Jurassic Park?
Lol, you won't be discriminated as a man. Women tend to get better grades as undergrads, and plenty of grad departments are skewed towards women. Berkeley's demographics -- although extreme -- are not that surprising.

User avatar
Boston_NYG2245

Bronze
Posts: 238
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Boston_NYG2245 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:55 am

thecactus wrote:
jpal13 wrote:Still none of this explains Why they favor women so much. That's a big disparity between men and women. While I like the ratio, I am worried I will be discriminated against as a man. I mean 60/40! Are they trying to be Jurassic Park?
Lol, you won't be discriminated as a man. Women tend to get better grades as undergrads, and plenty of grad departments are skewed towards women. Berkeley's demographics -- although extreme -- are not that surprising.
I don't think schools really take gender into account when they make admissions decisions. Women do tend to have higher grades and Berkeley tends to weight GPA more than other schools, so really not that surprising. Additionally, it could be that they admitted equal amounts of men and women and by some coincidence larger proportion of women than men decided to attend.

PigBodine

Bronze
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by PigBodine » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:39 am

Boston_NYG2245 wrote:
thecactus wrote:
jpal13 wrote:Still none of this explains Why they favor women so much. That's a big disparity between men and women. While I like the ratio, I am worried I will be discriminated against as a man. I mean 60/40! Are they trying to be Jurassic Park?
Lol, you won't be discriminated as a man. Women tend to get better grades as undergrads, and plenty of grad departments are skewed towards women. Berkeley's demographics -- although extreme -- are not that surprising.
I don't think schools really take gender into account when they make admissions decisions. Women do tend to have higher grades and Berkeley tends to weight GPA more than other schools, so really not that surprising.
Yeah. When you're tilting things in favor of one metric (either gpa or LSAT) more than other schools, it stands to reason that there's a lot of virgin territory at the business end of that, so to speak.

In other words, someone with a 4.33/164 isn't likely to get in anywhere better than Berkeley, and they'll usually get a very high yield from those kind of candidates. Similarly, NYU, who try really aggressively to maintain their 172 median, give a lot of offers to kids with 172/3.4+s. Someone with a 3.6 and a 172 isn't likely to get an offer from a higher ranked school than NYU. It's just the case that the first type of student is disproportionately female, and the latter type is disproportionately male. Females have higher gpas on averages, and are slightly less likely to score above 170 on the LSAT. NYU's having this same problem right now in reverse. The last class was something like 60/40 male, and apparently they're less than happy about that.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
boalthopeful

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:38 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by boalthopeful » Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:25 pm

to follow up on a previous post....can someone talk about committee review in more depth?

User avatar
MrShneebly

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by MrShneebly » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:06 pm

boalthopeful wrote:to follow up on a previous post....can someone talk about committee review in more depth?
I saw Dead Tom talk about it in this interview, but it's still pretty vague. If anyone can expand on this, that'd be awesome

http://www.top-law-schools.com/tom-interview.html

User avatar
MrShneebly

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by MrShneebly » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:07 pm

* dean, that is

ricsllscir

Bronze
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:45 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by ricsllscir » Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:12 pm

MrShneebly wrote:* dean, that is
hahaha, priceless typo

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
MrShneebly

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by MrShneebly » Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:23 pm

Are there any current Berkeley students on this forum that were out of state applicants? I'd like to ask you a few questions, if you don't mind (especially if you didn't have shoo-in numbers).

User avatar
msblaw89

Gold
Posts: 2662
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by msblaw89 » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:36 pm

Anyone know if Berkeley releases things on Thursday or Friday? Or are they more of a Monday release school?

jeninamillion

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 2:17 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jeninamillion » Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:48 pm

MrShneebly wrote:
boalthopeful wrote:to follow up on a previous post....can someone talk about committee review in more depth?
I saw Dead Tom talk about it in this interview, but it's still pretty vague. If anyone can expand on this, that'd be awesome

http://www.top-law-schools.com/tom-interview.html
If I wasn't a victim in the 1/09 massacre of people who went UR on 11/22, is it safe to say that I'm now in committee review or waitlisted? Or is there still a huge chance of rejection. I'm a splitter so my chances at Berkeley aren't that great, numbers-wise, but it is my undergrad and I got a LOR from a Berkeley Law professor who taught undergrad.

User avatar
msblaw89

Gold
Posts: 2662
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by msblaw89 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:19 pm

I want some Berkeley love!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Zelda

Bronze
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Zelda » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:39 pm

msblaw89 wrote:I want some Berkeley love!
+1.

I feel abandoned by California.

User avatar
cactuarX3

Silver
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by cactuarX3 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:46 pm

MrShneebly wrote:
boalthopeful wrote:to follow up on a previous post....can someone talk about committee review in more depth?
I saw Dead Tom talk about it in this interview, but it's still pretty vague. If anyone can expand on this, that'd be awesome

http://www.top-law-schools.com/tom-interview.html
Subconscious Muppet reference?

http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Dead_Tom

User avatar
cactuarX3

Silver
Posts: 686
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by cactuarX3 » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:46 pm

damn the double posts

User avatar
MrShneebly

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by MrShneebly » Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:15 pm

Oh my god...that would be awesome. If that muppet was in charge of decisions. Somehow.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


norcal_youngin

New
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:43 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by norcal_youngin » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:33 am

11/22er getting more impatient as the silence continues

djkrish

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:47 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by djkrish » Fri Jan 13, 2012 2:44 am

norcal_youngin wrote:11/22er getting more impatient as the silence continues
im 12/12 and I'm growing impatient as well. i feel like california just doesn't like me.

User avatar
boalthopeful

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:38 pm

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by boalthopeful » Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:46 pm

norcal_youngin wrote:11/22er getting more impatient as the silence continues
+1

[at least we haven't been rejected yo]

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Mal Reynolds » Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:09 pm

I am really hoping there will be a ton of news next week. It would be worth it if lots of 11/22'ers and 12/12'ers heard back next week. Hopefully they are doing a Chicago-sized batch for next week.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”