Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3280 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ... 132  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:51 am 
Online
My days of not being taken seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Posts: 4843
xiaojimu wrote:
Just checked, DLSed.

Is that likely a R or A?


You would know if you were accepted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Posts: 179
neuroticjew wrote:
Well, Chicago's deposit deadline is Monday and Stanford may not get back to me for another two weeks at this rate. If I send Chicago a check will Stanford find out and blackball me? :roll:


No. They won't know for a few weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 297
adam1 wrote:
neuroticjew wrote:
Well, Chicago's deposit deadline is Monday and Stanford may not get back to me for another two weeks at this rate. If I send Chicago a check will Stanford find out and blackball me? :roll:


No. They won't know for a few weeks.


I don't think schools can/would track where you send deposits. They don't expect to gamble your other options away while awaiting a decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Posts: 179
ned wrote:
adam1 wrote:
neuroticjew wrote:
Well, Chicago's deposit deadline is Monday and Stanford may not get back to me for another two weeks at this rate. If I send Chicago a check will Stanford find out and blackball me? :roll:


No. They won't know for a few weeks.


I don't think schools can/would track where you send deposits. They don't expect to gamble your other options away while awaiting a decision.


I didn't mean to suggest that they would care. But they have no way of knowing at all until after May 1 if I recall. That's when schools start sharing deposit info...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Posts: 827
adam1 wrote:
ned wrote:
I don't think schools can/would track where you send deposits. They don't expect to gamble your other options away while awaiting a decision.
I didn't mean to suggest that they would care. But they have no way of knowing at all until after May 1 if I recall. That's when schools start sharing deposit info...
Ned says schools don't track/share deposit info. Adam says they do? Which one is correct, and how is this shared: through LSAC or some common database?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 11:36 pm
Posts: 42
jim-green wrote:
adam1 wrote:
ned wrote:
I don't think schools can/would track where you send deposits. They don't expect to gamble your other options away while awaiting a decision.
I didn't mean to suggest that they would care. But they have no way of knowing at all until after May 1 if I recall. That's when schools start sharing deposit info...
Ned says schools don't track/share deposit info. Adam says they do? Which one is correct, and how is this shared: through LSAC or some common database?


It's through LSAC after May 15. Scroll all the way down:

http://www.lsac.org/jd/apply/whom-to-admit.asp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 297
acappella wrote:
jim-green wrote:
adam1 wrote:
ned wrote:
I don't think schools can/would track where you send deposits. They don't expect to gamble your other options away while awaiting a decision.
I didn't mean to suggest that they would care. But they have no way of knowing at all until after May 1 if I recall. That's when schools start sharing deposit info...
Ned says schools don't track/share deposit info. Adam says they do? Which one is correct, and how is this shared: through LSAC or some common database?


It's through LSAC after May 15. Scroll all the way down:

http://www.lsac.org/jd/apply/whom-to-admit.asp


Yeah, I didn't realize that they did this: "Beginning May 15 each year, these reports now also include the names and LSAC account numbers for all candidates who have deposits/commitments at multiple participating schools."

So they'll know where you plan on going if you don't get taken off their wait list. And schools receiving your deposits will know where else you might choose to go. The only impact I can imagine is, they won't take people off the wait list who got in to Y or H, since those people are less likely to attend S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm
Posts: 102
.


Last edited by YesNoMaybe on Sat Aug 11, 2012 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Posts: 4832
neuroticjew wrote:
Well, Chicago's deposit deadline is Monday and Stanford may not get back to me for another two weeks at this rate. If I send Chicago a check will Stanford find out and blackball me? :roll:


No, and lsac specifically advises schools to not participate in this type of thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:16 pm
Posts: 28
salamanders wrote:
DLS!!!! wahooo

Not actually sad about it, I'm an east-coaster through and through.



Got the letter. WL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Posts: 665
salamanders wrote:
salamanders wrote:
DLS!!!! wahooo

Not actually sad about it, I'm an east-coaster through and through.



Got the letter. WL



If this was a weekday I would be freaking out or excited. But it's Saturday...I'm too relaxed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:22 am
Posts: 12
salamanders wrote:
salamanders wrote:
DLS!!!! wahooo

Not actually sad about it, I'm an east-coaster through and through.



Got the letter. WL


Does it say they are no longer accepting people? Or something to that effect in the letter?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm
Posts: 409
Still UR :S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 297
salamanders wrote:
salamanders wrote:
DLS!!!! wahooo

Not actually sad about it, I'm an east-coaster through and through.



Got the letter. WL


Next-day delivery?!?! You gonna ride it out?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:16 pm
Posts: 28
ddalton22 wrote:
salamanders wrote:
salamanders wrote:
DLS!!!! wahooo

Not actually sad about it, I'm an east-coaster through and through.



Got the letter. WL


Does it say they are no longer accepting people? Or something to that effect in the letter?


Sorry, no inside admissions info in my letter. Ned, not sure yet!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Posts: 233
salamanders wrote:
ddalton22 wrote:
salamanders wrote:
salamanders wrote:
DLS!!!! wahooo

Not actually sad about it, I'm an east-coaster through and through.



Got the letter. WL


Does it say they are no longer accepting people? Or something to that effect in the letter?


Sorry, no inside admissions info in my letter. Ned, not sure yet!


Wow the entire nature of a DLS just changed. Maybe they sent out all the WL's last week then. Or maybe early next week's DLS's will be waitlists. Maybe they've stopped accepting people now. Interesting...

Congrats on the WL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 297
yepyepyep wrote:

Wow the entire nature of a DLS just changed. Maybe they sent out all the WL's last week then. Or maybe early next week's DLS's will be waitlists. Maybe they've stopped accepting people now. Interesting...

Congrats on the WL


Some DSL'd folks called admissions this past week and confirmed they were rejected.

ETA: very few WLs so far. Maybe 3 or 4. This one was the first one received my mail that I know of.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Posts: 233
ned wrote:
yepyepyep wrote:

Wow the entire nature of a DLS just changed. Maybe they sent out all the WL's last week then. Or maybe early next week's DLS's will be waitlists. Maybe they've stopped accepting people now. Interesting...

Congrats on the WL


Some DSL'd folks called admissions this past week and confirmed they were rejected.

ETA: very few WLs so far. Maybe 3 or 4. This one was the first one received my mail that I know of.


Yeah I just meant that, since this person got a DLS first and then a WL, DLS no longer means just rejection.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Posts: 179
ned wrote:
acappella wrote:
jim-green wrote:
adam1 wrote:
I don't think schools can/would track where you send deposits. They don't expect to gamble your other options away while awaiting a decision.
I didn't mean to suggest that they would care. But they have no way of knowing at all until after May 1 if I recall. That's when schools start sharing deposit info...
Ned says schools don't track/share deposit info. Adam says they do? Which one is correct, and how is this shared: through LSAC or some common database?


It's through LSAC after May 15. Scroll all the way down:

http://www.lsac.org/jd/apply/whom-to-admit.asp


Having reviewed this again, I'm not sure that Stanford will know anything of your depositing unless you have made "deposits/commitments" to multiple schools. Am I confused?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 297
adam1 wrote:
ned wrote:
acappella wrote:
jim-green wrote:
I didn't mean to suggest that they would care. But they have no way of knowing at all until after May 1 if I recall. That's when schools start sharing deposit info...
Ned says schools don't track/share deposit info. Adam says they do? Which one is correct, and how is this shared: through LSAC or some common database?


It's through LSAC after May 15. Scroll all the way down:

http://www.lsac.org/jd/apply/whom-to-admit.asp


Having reviewed this again, I'm not sure that Stanford will know anything of your depositing unless you have made "deposits/commitments" to multiple schools. Am I confused?


Yeah, it does specifically say "multiple", as though people who submit only a "single" deposit are not reported. I interpret it this way: Schools that receive your deposit are informed of all the schools that have received deposits from you. Schools that don't have a deposit from you aren't informed of your deposit activities. A very sound dating policy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm
Posts: 297
Question for y'all: I have a new professional item to add to my resume. It's basically just an upgrade to a position I hold at a research lab, and also the lab was upgraded to a "Center". My activities haven't changed very much, but it's still a "new development" so I want to inform my schools.

Should I send a new copy of my resume with that one extra item added to it, or should I just send a note about the new upgrades without a new resume? If I send a whole new resume, how do I draw their attention to the new item?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Posts: 233
ned wrote:
Question for y'all: I have a new professional item to add to my resume. It's basically just an upgrade to a position I hold at a research lab, and also the lab was upgraded to a "Center". My activities haven't changed very much, but it's still a "new development" so I want to inform my schools.

Should I send a new copy of my resume with that one extra item added to it, or should I just send a note about the new upgrades without a new resume? If I send a whole new resume, how do I draw their attention to the new item?


I think they'd be about the same, but I'd probably send the addendum. I imagine if you sent a new resume, they would also keep the old one (so that they would still know that you sent something new and they'd be able to see where it changed, and you would still get the credit for being interested). But an addendum probably is less risky in that you can talk around it a bit (what you're doing now), add a bit about Stanford, and then they'd know for sure you've sent something new and worked on it. But that's just my 2cents...what do I know really.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Posts: 4832
Hey guys, so I will be applying next cycle, SLS would a dream come true as I think it would be for anyone. I figured being as you are fresh off of/still applying you are the perfect group to ask about next year as of now.

My question deals with whether or not to apply early in fall, or wait until better gpa after fall grades post. I know this is an often discussed topic on TLS but wanted to know about SLS specifically as maybe some of you made this decision this cycle.

My potentially best gpa if applying in fall would be 3.67/3.68 I forgot the exact number, but applying after dec grades would be 3.72 (praying). Looking at numbers, it appears this is a significant difference being this could put me from below 25th percentile to at it. How would you suggest handling this? Submitting early? Submitting after fall grades (in December) or submitting early than updating with new grades (can you even do that?)

I know this question doesn't necessarily belong in this thread but anyone who has some advice, it would be appreciated and given much weight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:40 pm
Posts: 12
Br3v wrote:
Hey guys, so I will be applying next cycle, SLS would a dream come true as I think it would be for anyone. I figured being as you are fresh off of/still applying you are the perfect group to ask about next year as of now.

My question deals with whether or not to apply early in fall, or wait until better gpa after fall grades post. I know this is an often discussed topic on TLS but wanted to know about SLS specifically as maybe some of you made this decision this cycle.

My potentially best gpa if applying in fall would be 3.67/3.68 I forgot the exact number, but applying after dec grades would be 3.72 (praying). Looking at numbers, it appears this is a significant difference being this could put me from below 25th percentile to at it. How would you suggest handling this? Submitting early? Submitting after fall grades (in December) or submitting early than updating with new grades (can you even do that?)

I know this question doesn't necessarily belong in this thread but anyone who has some advice, it would be appreciated and given much weight.


Since I made a similar jump in GPA from end of last year to end of first semester, I can say-- I doubt it matters. I applied early, got soft held, submitted my first semester grades, and still haven't heard. But if you're worried about getting flat rejected instantly, you might as well wait. That GPA (like mine) obviously isn't near auto-admit, so you won't hear from Stanford until the spring regardless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:49 am
Posts: 162
Br3v wrote:
Hey guys, so I will be applying next cycle, SLS would a dream come true as I think it would be for anyone. I figured being as you are fresh off of/still applying you are the perfect group to ask about next year as of now.

My question deals with whether or not to apply early in fall, or wait until better gpa after fall grades post. I know this is an often discussed topic on TLS but wanted to know about SLS specifically as maybe some of you made this decision this cycle.

My potentially best gpa if applying in fall would be 3.67/3.68 I forgot the exact number, but applying after dec grades would be 3.72 (praying). Looking at numbers, it appears this is a significant difference being this could put me from below 25th percentile to at it. How would you suggest handling this? Submitting early? Submitting after fall grades (in December) or submitting early than updating with new grades (can you even do that?)

I know this question doesn't necessarily belong in this thread but anyone who has some advice, it would be appreciated and given much weight.


You should definitely apply when you're ready to submit. You're probably not going to be rejected before you get a chance to submit your fall grades anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3280 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ... 132  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 2012Lsatscore, accentuator, eomea5, mmartens358, Vincent, wert3813 and 26 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB