Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
backwards54
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:26 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby backwards54 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:48 pm

hellothisisme wrote:For those who say they are UR, does your status checker actually say "under review"? Because I have been stuck on "Your file has been submitted for review" for awhile...


Same here.

justinp
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:33 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby justinp » Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:54 pm

So anyone have any knowledge of what I'm likely looking at as an UR 11/17, no DLS candidate at this point? I'm assuming waitlist?

User avatar
ned
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby ned » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:01 pm

backwards54 wrote:
hellothisisme wrote:For those who say they are UR, does your status checker actually say "under review"? Because I have been stuck on "Your file has been submitted for review" for awhile...


Same here.


I used UR as shorthand. I assume everybody's has the same wording.

User avatar
ru1ess
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:39 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby ru1ess » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:22 pm

justinp wrote:So anyone have any knowledge of what I'm likely looking at as an UR 11/17, no DLS candidate at this point? I'm assuming waitlist?


I'd say soft hold-- you're numbers are too good, they may just be looking for more 'diverse' candidates and seeing where you fit.

User avatar
hypothalamus
Posts: 745
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby hypothalamus » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:27 pm

Jesus, you guys!!! I've been away all day, I log in... and there are all these 1/19 DLS updates. Way to cause a sister to have a heart attack!

Just checked - still UR 1/19. But then again, they will probably continue the ding wave tomorrow...

User avatar
crystalized
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:23 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby crystalized » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:54 am

Unimportant question, but are there other batches in-between UR 1/6 and UR 1/19? I'm UR 1/12, anyone else?

User avatar
Tom Joad
Posts: 4542
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Tom Joad » Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:02 am

crystalized wrote:Unimportant question, but are there other batches in-between UR 1/6 and UR 1/19? I'm UR 1/12, anyone else?

Double rainbow...what does it all mean?

User avatar
amc987
Posts: 568
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby amc987 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:23 am

Tom Joad wrote:Double rainbow...what does it all mean?


I actually LOL'd. Well played, Tom Joad.

User avatar
FryBreadPower
Posts: 908
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby FryBreadPower » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:14 am

hypothalamus wrote:Jesus, you guys!!! I've been away all day, I log in... and there are all these 1/19 DLS updates. Way to cause a sister to have a heart attack!

Just checked - still UR 1/19. But then again, they will probably continue the ding wave tomorrow...


Phew. Ditto here.

User avatar
Tom Joad
Posts: 4542
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Tom Joad » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:15 am

hypothalamus wrote:But then again, they will probably continue the ding wave tomorrow...

Ding them all! (except TLSers and I appreciate LSNers to, so spare them as well).

User avatar
thelawschoolproject
Posts: 1364
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby thelawschoolproject » Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:14 am

Survived the bloodbath. Huzzah.

User avatar
FryBreadPower
Posts: 908
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby FryBreadPower » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:24 am

thelawschoolproject wrote:Survived the bloodbath. Huzzah.


Wonder-friends ACTIVATE - FORM OF.... A SOFT HOLD CANDIDATE.

User avatar
sharktankdean
Posts: 663
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby sharktankdean » Thu Mar 29, 2012 10:54 am

Hey I know that this cycle isn't really following any defined pattern but does Stanford usually call people on one of the days of Columbia's ASW or was that somethings that happened to occur last year?

User avatar
Tom Joad
Posts: 4542
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Tom Joad » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:12 am

sharktankdean wrote:Hey I know that this cycle isn't really following any defined pattern but does Stanford usually call people on one of the days of Columbia's ASW or was that somethings that happened to occur last year?

"Nice to meet you, President of Columbia, oh hold on, my phone is vibrating, oh I will have to take this one. It is STANFORD."

User avatar
sharktankdean
Posts: 663
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby sharktankdean » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:11 pm

Tom Joad wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:Hey I know that this cycle isn't really following any defined pattern but does Stanford usually call people on one of the days of Columbia's ASW or was that somethings that happened to occur last year?

"Nice to meet you, President of Columbia, oh hold on, my phone is vibrating, oh I will have to take this one. It is STANFORD."


lol...that would be epic

But honestly I really need Stanford and Harvard to get back to me. I'm tired of my parents constantly asking me for updates and I am tired of telling people "it depends" when they ask me what law school i'm going to.

Mal Reynolds
Posts: 12630
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Mal Reynolds » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:14 pm

sharktankdean wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:Hey I know that this cycle isn't really following any defined pattern but does Stanford usually call people on one of the days of Columbia's ASW or was that somethings that happened to occur last year?

"Nice to meet you, President of Columbia, oh hold on, my phone is vibrating, oh I will have to take this one. It is STANFORD."


lol...that would be epic

But honestly I really need Stanford and Harvard to get back to me. I'm tired of my parents constantly asking me for updates and I am tired of telling people "it depends" when they ask me what law school i'm going to.


How about they put the applicants who are still waiting in a custom-built arena and let us fight to the death for the final spots?

vto35
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:14 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby vto35 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:19 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:Hey I know that this cycle isn't really following any defined pattern but does Stanford usually call people on one of the days of Columbia's ASW or was that somethings that happened to occur last year?

"Nice to meet you, President of Columbia, oh hold on, my phone is vibrating, oh I will have to take this one. It is STANFORD."


lol...that would be epic

But honestly I really need Stanford and Harvard to get back to me. I'm tired of my parents constantly asking me for updates and I am tired of telling people "it depends" when they ask me what law school i'm going to.


How about they put the applicants who are still waiting in a custom-built arena and let us fight to the death for the final spots?


Stanford Law Hunger Games

YesNoMaybe
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby YesNoMaybe » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:21 pm

.
Last edited by YesNoMaybe on Sun Apr 15, 2012 10:58 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
moxy
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby moxy » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:22 pm

Mal Reynolds wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:Hey I know that this cycle isn't really following any defined pattern but does Stanford usually call people on one of the days of Columbia's ASW or was that somethings that happened to occur last year?

"Nice to meet you, President of Columbia, oh hold on, my phone is vibrating, oh I will have to take this one. It is STANFORD."


lol...that would be epic

But honestly I really need Stanford and Harvard to get back to me. I'm tired of my parents constantly asking me for updates and I am tired of telling people "it depends" when they ask me what law school i'm going to.


How about they put the applicants who are still waiting in a custom-built arena and let us fight to the death for the final spots?


There will be blood. A lot of it.

User avatar
moxy
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby moxy » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:23 pm

YesNoMaybe wrote:HAHAH. If they did that I would be Rue. Slim chance.

I was over analyzing LSN last night. I may be wrong...but I think for us January submit applicants they may just not have read our files yet. I saw people with the same completion date as me with much better stats that are still pending.


With my numbers, I will be the boy from District 9 while fighting Katniss for that backpack .. first to go

splbagel
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:53 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby splbagel » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:27 pm

moxy wrote:
YesNoMaybe wrote:HAHAH. If they did that I would be Rue. Slim chance.

I was over analyzing LSN last night. I may be wrong...but I think for us January submit applicants they may just not have read our files yet. I saw people with the same completion date as me with much better stats that are still pending.


With my numbers, I will be the boy from District 9 while fighting Katniss for that backpack .. first to go


I'd be Foxface from District 5... held out for a long time and looked halfway promising, but eventually going down just like the rest.

User avatar
Txrb182sc
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 9:14 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Txrb182sc » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:30 pm

So I'm guessing in this arena those applicants with military WE would totally be the delegates from the inner districts.

azgirl514
Posts: 66
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:39 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby azgirl514 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:44 pm

May the odds be ever in our favor (groan). I would like to think I am Katniss, but that's wishful thinking. I feel more like Gale, left behind with no clue what's going on.

vto35
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:14 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby vto35 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:48 pm

The psychological tortures would probably include LSAT questions

User avatar
seattleite23
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby seattleite23 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:26 pm

.
Last edited by seattleite23 on Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BrainsyK, dianersg, genjustice, hoy456, JD_Kingfish, lawschoolbound2017, Maaza, ngmlsat, NotAGolfer, spursforever, ws120, xn3345 and 50 guests