Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
amc987

Silver
Posts: 568
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by amc987 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:48 pm

Sorry, ned!

Still submitted for review here. I freak out and check my status every time someone reports a DLS. I think this process has taken a few years off of my life since Feb.

Hoping for more calls this week!!!

eits

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:36 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by eits » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:53 pm

Waitlisted via snail mail

User avatar
yepyepyep

Bronze
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by yepyepyep » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:55 pm

eits wrote:Waitlisted via snail mail
Maybe they're sending out the WL's now, and the huge ding wave will be later this week.

User avatar
thelawschoolproject

Silver
Posts: 1364
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by thelawschoolproject » Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:59 pm

yepyepyep wrote:
eits wrote:Waitlisted via snail mail
Maybe they're sending out the WL's now, and the huge ding wave will be later this week.
I can find no method to their madness. I just need my phone to ring.

User avatar
Bronck

Gold
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 1:28 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Bronck » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:01 pm

Still nothing from S. They're the only school from which I haven't heard anything. Just got my Yale WL today.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
ned

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by ned » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:24 pm

Well here's what I know:

1) definitely rejected. I called.
2) not seriously considered by sls during April*
3) no reason they needed to wait this long

* I am a visual artist, so my PS links to a website with video of my work, which I discuss in my statement. When a school takes me seriously I can tell because they view my site. My website analytics can track who's viewing, what they are viewing, and when. I got lots of views from the bay area earlier in the cycle but not this month.

User avatar
Parmenides

New
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 1:13 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Parmenides » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:29 pm

ned wrote:Well here's what I know:

1) definitely rejected. I called.
2) not seriously considered by sls during April*
3) no reason they needed to wait this long

* I am a visual artist, so my PS links to a website with video of my work, which I discuss in my statement. When a school takes me seriously I can tell because they view my site. My website analytics can track who's viewing, what they are viewing, and when. I got lots of views from the bay area earlier in the cycle but not this month.
Sorry about the rejection. Thanks for the information.
Good luck with any other schools you're waiting on.

User avatar
yepyepyep

Bronze
Posts: 232
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by yepyepyep » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:30 pm

ned wrote:Well here's what I know:

1) definitely rejected. I called.
2) not seriously considered by sls during April*
3) no reason they needed to wait this long

* I am a visual artist, so my PS links to a website with video of my work, which I discuss in my statement. When a school takes me seriously I can tell because they view my site. My website analytics can track who's viewing, what they are viewing, and when. I got lots of views from the bay area earlier in the cycle but not this month.
Sorry Ned. Best of luck with your other options!

Mista Bojangles

Bronze
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:33 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Mista Bojangles » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:57 pm

Also DLS today. Also rejected (called as well). Was quite a ride since going complete over 6 months ago on 10/10 - have to wonder, though, how long they may have been sitting on my decision.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


chucklesmcgee

Bronze
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:22 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by chucklesmcgee » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:05 pm

Mista Bojangles wrote:Also DLS today. Also rejected (called as well). Was quite a ride since going complete over 6 months ago on 10/10 - have to wonder, though, how long they may have been sitting on my decision.
I don't think that long. If they were, wouldn't they just release all the WL/rejects at once instead of trickling them out?

User avatar
sharktankdean

Silver
Posts: 663
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by sharktankdean » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:09 pm

I really need someone to get in this week. It would kill the theory that they are just separating the rest of us into the WL or rejection pile.

jd20122015

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:07 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jd20122015 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:12 pm

have any soft hold urms been dlsed? still alive.

User avatar
sharktankdean

Silver
Posts: 663
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by sharktankdean » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:18 pm

jd20122015 wrote:have any soft hold urms been dlsed? still alive.

Don't think soo.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


chucklesmcgee

Bronze
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:22 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by chucklesmcgee » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:18 pm

jd20122015 wrote:have any soft hold urms been dlsed? still alive.
Still alive but I'm barely breathing.

jd20122015

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:07 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jd20122015 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:21 pm

chucklesmcgee wrote:
jd20122015 wrote:have any soft hold urms been dlsed? still alive.
Still alive but I'm barely breathing.
i feel like the recent dlses have been non-urms. i'm probably wrong, but maybe there's another small urm wave coming? pretty please, stanford?

User avatar
Elendil

Silver
Posts: 516
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:45 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Elendil » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:25 pm

Sorry about the DLS's... when did you guys submit, again?

Still alive over here.

User avatar
sharktankdean

Silver
Posts: 663
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by sharktankdean » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:28 pm

I honestly don't think I'll start freaking out until a urm gets a DLS. I'm not sure if there will be another wave but I do know that we are still being evaluated. If they were done with us we would have all gotten our respective decisions especially since there was a wave last week. It has to mean they looked at our apps put those who didnt get in last week aside. After they go thru the non-Urms. Dean deal is prob gonna see if there is space for some more. If not then its WL or rejection. At least that's my view

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


jd20122015

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:07 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jd20122015 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:36 pm

sharktankdean wrote:I honestly don't think I'll start freaking out until a urm gets a DLS. I'm not sure if there will be another wave but I do know that we are still being evaluated. If they were done with us we would have all gotten our respective decisions especially since there was a wave last week. It has to mean they looked at our apps put those who didnt get in last week aside. After they go thru the non-Urms. Dean deal is prob gonna see if there is space for some more. If not then its WL or rejection. At least that's my view
i like this idea a lot.

Barca10

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:46 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Barca10 » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:38 pm

jd20122015 wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:I honestly don't think I'll start freaking out until a urm gets a DLS. I'm not sure if there will be another wave but I do know that we are still being evaluated. If they were done with us we would have all gotten our respective decisions especially since there was a wave last week. It has to mean they looked at our apps put those who didnt get in last week aside. After they go thru the non-Urms. Dean deal is prob gonna see if there is space for some more. If not then its WL or rejection. At least that's my view
i like this idea a lot.
+1

User avatar
larsoner

Bronze
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 11:33 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by larsoner » Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:42 pm

Barca10 wrote:
jd20122015 wrote:
sharktankdean wrote:I honestly don't think I'll start freaking out until a urm gets a DLS. I'm not sure if there will be another wave but I do know that we are still being evaluated. If they were done with us we would have all gotten our respective decisions especially since there was a wave last week. It has to mean they looked at our apps put those who didnt get in last week aside. After they go thru the non-Urms. Dean deal is prob gonna see if there is space for some more. If not then its WL or rejection. At least that's my view
i like this idea a lot.
+1
+1 since it implies more non-URMs will be getting in as well

User avatar
ned

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 1:47 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by ned » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:05 pm

Thank all for the well wishes! Keep pluckin that chicken!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


jim-green

Silver
Posts: 804
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by jim-green » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:07 pm

How is that possible with a 179/3.8?
Mista Bojangles wrote:Also DLS today. Also rejected (called as well). Was quite a ride since going complete over 6 months ago on 10/10 - have to wonder, though, how long they may have been sitting on my decision.

Mista Bojangles

Bronze
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:33 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Mista Bojangles » Mon Apr 16, 2012 8:27 pm

jim-green wrote:How is that possible with a 179/3.8?
Mista Bojangles wrote:Also DLS today. Also rejected (called as well). Was quite a ride since going complete over 6 months ago on 10/10 - have to wonder, though, how long they may have been sitting on my decision.
Not sure what to tell you. The 179 is a retake from a 173. My 3.8 is inflated a few hundredths by CC classes I took before college, but no other weaknesses I'm really aware of. Ivy UG, and I just finished up in the Israeli army, which I view as a strength but really is probably more like a wild card in that I have no idea how individual schools will view it. I felt I put together a strong app, and I got great money at all of CCN (including $90k at Chicago where I've deposited) which seems to preclude the possibility that I had any unforeseen weaknesses such as a LOR writer unexpectedly throwing me under the bus. So I'm not sure what to chalk it up to. Maybe H will still come through; I've been under review there for the same length of time (got held a few months back).

avemundi

Bronze
Posts: 108
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 12:59 pm

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by avemundi » Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:09 am

Mista Bojangles wrote:
jim-green wrote:How is that possible with a 179/3.8?
Mista Bojangles wrote:Also DLS today. Also rejected (called as well). Was quite a ride since going complete over 6 months ago on 10/10 - have to wonder, though, how long they may have been sitting on my decision.
Not sure what to tell you. The 179 is a retake from a 173. My 3.8 is inflated a few hundredths by CC classes I took before college, but no other weaknesses I'm really aware of. Ivy UG, and I just finished up in the Israeli army, which I view as a strength but really is probably more like a wild card in that I have no idea how individual schools will view it. I felt I put together a strong app, and I got great money at all of CCN (including $90k at Chicago where I've deposited) which seems to preclude the possibility that I had any unforeseen weaknesses such as a LOR writer unexpectedly throwing me under the bus. So I'm not sure what to chalk it up to. Maybe H will still come through; I've been under review there for the same length of time (got held a few months back).
your stats + military exp, and rejected. I am so fucked :0

sokomofo

Bronze
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am

Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by sokomofo » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:05 am

.
Last edited by sokomofo on Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”