Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 12:16 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Got bored did some LSN mining
Up until this point in 2010/2011 the data is as follow (not including those that stayed pending through the entire 2010 cycle)
Total Complete Apps 2010:40
Total Complete Apps 2011: 31
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2010: 3.87
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2011: 3.9 (Data only in tenths this round)
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2010: 172
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2011: 171
Accepted of those applied before today last year: 7 of 40
Thought people might be interested. Based on this tiny amount of data it looks like apps are down and among those apps numbers are down a bit too.
Up until this point in 2010/2011 the data is as follow (not including those that stayed pending through the entire 2010 cycle)
Total Complete Apps 2010:40
Total Complete Apps 2011: 31
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2010: 3.87
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2011: 3.9 (Data only in tenths this round)
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2010: 172
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2011: 171
Accepted of those applied before today last year: 7 of 40
Thought people might be interested. Based on this tiny amount of data it looks like apps are down and among those apps numbers are down a bit too.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This is great...if the same pattern held to Harvard, Columbia, and Chicago, we might assume that numbers were at least slightly down. It doesn't seem likely that internet usage would be explanation for a drop that significant (though its possible). Can we determine whether LSN has grown in activity progressively every year, even last year when we know for certain that apps dropped? If participation grew last year despite the drop in apps, then we could def be reasonably assured these numbers reflect something....admisionquestion wrote:Got bored did some LSN mining
Up until this point in 2010/2011 the data is as follow (not including those that stayed pending through the entire 2010 cycle)
Total Complete Apps 2010:40
Total Complete Apps 2011: 31
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2010: 3.87
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2011: 3.9 (Data only in tenths this round)
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2010: 172
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2011: 171
Accepted of those applied before today last year: 7 of 40
Thought people might be interested. Based on this tiny amount of data it looks like apps are down and among those apps numbers are down a bit too.
-
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:17 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nice work! How did you search LSN based on date for last year? I can't find a way to filter out only those who applied by this date last year..
-
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 6:31 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Great work. I'm not even applying to Stanford, but I'm glad I popped in here. Hopefully this trend holds for other T14 schools as well...admisionquestion wrote:Got bored did some LSN mining
Up until this point in 2010/2011 the data is as follow (not including those that stayed pending through the entire 2010 cycle)
Total Complete Apps 2010:40
Total Complete Apps 2011: 31
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2010: 3.87
Median Applicant GPA at this point 2011: 3.9 (Data only in tenths this round)
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2010: 172
Median Applicant LSAT at this point 2011: 171
Accepted of those applied before today last year: 7 of 40
Thought people might be interested. Based on this tiny amount of data it looks like apps are down and among those apps numbers are down a bit too.
-
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:17 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow. I think I figured out how to do this for Harvard and it seems: this year, 41 completed apps so far. Last year at this time: 57. Definitely looks like a drop in apps.
Last edited by freestallion on Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Might be that some people only put it up after they get their JR1's. Don't think this is quite as telling as it seems on its face. If I didn't know about LSN beforehand, the JR1 email would've certainly gotten me pretty giddy and show-off-y.freestallion wrote:Wow. I think I figured out how to do this for Harvard and it seems: this year, 41 completed apps so far. Last year at this time: 60. Definitely looks like a drop in apps.
Also, fine, if everyone else has, I'll change me avatar too...
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
True, it could be that alot of people hide their profiles until after the cycle is over.
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
But the Stanford numbers are somewhat telling, even though it's a very small sample. Don't give up hope!MumofCad wrote:True, it could be that alot of people hide their profiles until after the cycle is over.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well it could be worse anyhow. Imagine if you get rejected from everywhere in a lower app year. That would be discouraging.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
?
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Edit
Last edited by MumofCad on Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
!
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Like I said in my PM, I do know people who've gotten in off their softs. I would be the last one to discourage anyone from giving it a go.
Last edited by MumofCad on Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Hawkeye Pierce
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Interesting statistics. I'm not sure how much we can read into those numbers, but it is, at the very least, slightly encouraging.
- mickeyD
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
tagged. good luck everyone!
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by jim-green on Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Justdoingmybest
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They received and went under review yesterday.
Last edited by Justdoingmybest on Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
New blog post if anyone wants to check it out - Dean talks about being savvy regarding the pressure on scholarships and other things from law schools. Advising to download the code of conduct for law school adcoms - interesting she mentions the date by which a school can not ask you to accept/reject an offer. I feel like it was before the offer I already got is supposed to be accepted or lost. I'll need to check into that...
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I just want to say that their freaking fee waiver application is bogus.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What does it entail? Or what is bogus about it? Curious...thelawschoolproject wrote:I just want to say that their freaking fee waiver application is bogus.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
offer from where?MumofCad wrote:New blog post if anyone wants to check it out - Dean talks about being savvy regarding the pressure on scholarships and other things from law schools. Advising to download the code of conduct for law school adcoms - interesting she mentions the date by which a school can not ask you to accept/reject an offer. I feel like it was before the offer I already got is supposed to be accepted or lost. I'll need to check into that...
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The need for parental information (even if you're old, and pay your own bills, etc.) I called today and asked if I really needed my parents' information (as I have one parent who I no longer speak to) and she said yes, or else it would be thrown out. So, I have no idea what to do, unless I lie. Which, would be bad.MumofCad wrote:What does it entail? Or what is bogus about it? Curious...thelawschoolproject wrote:I just want to say that their freaking fee waiver application is bogus.
-
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
@Schola - not Stanford, don't worry lol
@lawschoolproject - Unfortunately for us non-trads, I've heard that is the way all fin aid for law school's work. If you're going to need it most likely, you might as well get it now. I'm not up-to-date on these things, but I think my Harvard friend said it works on some sort of sliding scale based on your age and it isn't a non-factor until like 30+ Not sure if that is accurate, but before you give up, you might want to find out if you are going to need the info anyhow later on KWIM? I thought she said at 28, they took into account 20% of her parent's income and it was a real pain because they were small business owners who aren't great about that sort of thing and it was just plain awkward.
@lawschoolproject - Unfortunately for us non-trads, I've heard that is the way all fin aid for law school's work. If you're going to need it most likely, you might as well get it now. I'm not up-to-date on these things, but I think my Harvard friend said it works on some sort of sliding scale based on your age and it isn't a non-factor until like 30+ Not sure if that is accurate, but before you give up, you might want to find out if you are going to need the info anyhow later on KWIM? I thought she said at 28, they took into account 20% of her parent's income and it was a real pain because they were small business owners who aren't great about that sort of thing and it was just plain awkward.
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, it's just really inconvenient and not a proper way to assess my ability to pay at all if my parents' information is considered. But, that's a good point about financial aid. I'm hoping that since I've had some other factors in my life that most schools will consider me independent, though.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login