When did you submit/go UR?justicefishywishy wrote:Just got in via phone call. Penn sure has a fast turn around!
Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:49 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- FidusAchates
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:57 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks for the congrats, everyone!
UCR dates were 2/9 and 2/13.
UCR dates were 2/9 and 2/13.
Last edited by FidusAchates on Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:49 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by MichelFoucault on Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:35 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
UCR Update 1/27 --> 2/15
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:47 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by ekbrown09 on Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hypothalamus
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Same.ekbrown09 wrote:same here.chapmaco wrote:UCR Update 1/27 --> 2/15
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:45 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
1/8 Submit, 1/24 complete, 2/13 UCRMichelFoucault wrote:When did you submit/go UR?justicefishywishy wrote:Just got in via phone call. Penn sure has a fast turn around!
- paulshortys10
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:03 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dannnggg I'm 1/27 too but no update since....This is the end guys..chapmaco wrote:UCR Update 1/27 --> 2/15
- mr_unemployed
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
hey! cut it out with the pessimism! i'm in the same boat as you, my friend. let's ride this wave to shorepaulshortys10 wrote:dannnggg I'm 1/27 too but no update since....This is the end guys..chapmaco wrote:UCR Update 1/27 --> 2/15
or wash back out into the UPenn-less stormy waters and drown unhappily
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:05 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
mr_unemployed wrote:hey! cut it out with the pessimism! i'm in the same boat as you, my friend. let's ride this wave to shorepaulshortys10 wrote:dannnggg I'm 1/27 too but no update since....This is the end guys..chapmaco wrote:UCR Update 1/27 --> 2/15
or wash back out into the UPenn-less stormy waters and drown unhappily
Anything can happen! Lightening can strike, I've seen it before. Until you're dinged you have a shot. Hang tough!!
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:55 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Submitted 1/9. Whyyyy am I still stuck at complete? I just want to get out of this goddam queue.
- QueMellow
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:09 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dude, I submitted in December and am stuck at complete 1/3. Hang in there.kingofspain wrote:Submitted 1/9. Whyyyy am I still stuck at complete? I just want to get out of this goddam queue.
- Green Glass Windows
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
paulshortys10 wrote:dannnggg I'm 1/27 too but no update since....This is the end guys..chapmaco wrote:UCR Update 1/27 --> 2/15
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mithriliel
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:56 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Me six.[/quote]steelers2012 wrote:FavoriteColorGRUE wrote:Me five.camillefisch wrote:shroeder wrote:Still at 1/27 UCR
Me four.
Me 7[/quote]
Me 8? hopefully they're taking all of us soon.... are we still capable of optimism?
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:20 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think many of you will find this technical. I regard my chances at obtaining admission as quite low, particularly after the wait. (173, 3.39). In that spirit I sent the following email. What do you guys think?
To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
- UtilityMonster
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:16 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It is a shame you misspelled opinion.ilovestandardtests wrote:I think many of you will find this technical. I regard my chances at obtaining admission as quite low, particularly after the wait. (173, 3.39). In that spirit I sent the following email. What do you guys think?
To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
FTFYUtilityMonster wrote:It is a shameilovestandardtests wrote:I think many of you will find this technical. I regard my chances at obtaining admission as quite low, particularly after the wait. (173, 3.39). In that spirit I sent the following email. What do you guys think?
To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlanderyou misspelled opinion.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- AntipodeanPhil
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This must be a flame.ilovestandardtests wrote: To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
If not, you missed two apostrophes for possessives in the first sentence, which will make any educated reader cringe, the tone is excessively formal, and this:
doesn't make any sense. ED acceptances are binding in the sense that, if you choose not to attend, LSAC prevents you from attending any other school. This email doesn't prevent you from attending any other school. You can promise not to attend any other school (as you do in the previous sentence), but that's something different.It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is.
Also, of course they can accept, disregard, or laugh at your statements (amongst other things). Why would you point that out?
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:20 am
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This email is obviously not binding in same contractual sense as binding early decsion. I was expressing sincere sentiment. After being flamed incessantly i emailed this to a family friend who is a judge and on the board of a top 25 school. She replied " Tongue in cheeck, I like it".AntipodeanPhil wrote:This must be a flame.ilovestandardtests wrote: To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
If not, you missed two apostrophes for possessives in the first sentence, which will make any educated reader cringe, the tone is excessively formal, and this:
doesn't make any sense. ED acceptances are binding in the sense that, if you choose not to attend, LSAC prevents you from attending any other school. This email doesn't prevent you from attending any other school. You can promise not to attend any other school (as you do in the previous sentence), but that's something different.It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is.
Also, of course they can accept, disregard, or laugh at your statements (amongst other things). Why would you point that out?
So in conclsuion WHY SO SERIOUS?
As to the typos, highly unfortunate.
PS I will let everyone know whether I get in and/or any response to this email
- DaftAndDirect
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
who the f*ck is this guy?
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 8:08 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
DaftAndDirect wrote:who the f*ck is this guy?
ilovestandardtests wrote:Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cogitoergosum
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:13 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, y'know - Jeff Nordlander...lsatcrazy wrote:DaftAndDirect wrote:who the f*ck is this guy?ilovestandardtests wrote:Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
NO!! Continue your legal education? Where did you begin it? You decided they are the right school? Why? Sorry, no. No No No
- DaftAndDirect
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
f*ck...my bad.cogitoergosum wrote:Yeah, y'know - Jeff Nordlander...lsatcrazy wrote:DaftAndDirect wrote:who the f*ck is this guy?ilovestandardtests wrote:Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
I love Jeff Nordlander.
Actually, when I let it mull for a bit, I think I can't stand Jeff Nordlander.
- hypothalamus
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hahah I was convinced the email was a joke? But I guess notAntipodeanPhil wrote:This must be a flame.ilovestandardtests wrote: To whom it may concern:
In the months following my applications submission, it has become clear to me the University of Pennsylvanias School of Law is the ideal institution for continuing my legal education. Should the privilege of admission be extended I would attend. It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is. Invariably, it is Penn's prerogative to accept, disregard or laugh at this statement. I simply wished to express the sentiment. Thank you for taking the time to evaluate my application.
Warm wishes, Jeff Nordlander
If not, you missed two apostrophes for possessives in the first sentence, which will make any educated reader cringe, the tone is excessively formal, and this:
doesn't make any sense. ED acceptances are binding in the sense that, if you choose not to attend, LSAC prevents you from attending any other school. This email doesn't prevent you from attending any other school. You can promise not to attend any other school (as you do in the previous sentence), but that's something different.It Is my opininion this expressed sentiment would be binding, if not technically, in the same manner by which a Binding Early Decision is.
Also, of course they can accept, disregard, or laugh at your statements (amongst other things). Why would you point that out?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login