Page 105 of 200

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:07 pm
by Elendil
MachineLemon wrote:
bluenoser wrote:Anyone else with a 175 still waiting?
175+ and still waiting. Late October submit.
A friend of mine is still waiting with a 175+ 3.9+, late November or early December submit...

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:08 pm
by WhiteGuy5
Nelson wrote:
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
thestillpoint wrote:Honestly, I have no idea. But if you search LSN for those with 172 and 3.87 - 3.91, you can find six who list a decision for Columbia. Only one was waitlisted. Three were accepted in Feb, one was accepted in January. One was accepted with no date given. Two received a $25,000 scholarship and one received a $30,000.

I don't know the logic, but, despite the small sample size, I've now remained hopeful for both an acceptance and even the possibility of some merit aid for those of us who haven't heard.
I'm right under 3.87 =(
You'll probably get in. Columbia is very predictable and you're at the LSAT median/above the GPA median. I wouldn't worry yet, there haven't been that many people with numbers worse than yours get in up until now besides ED and URM so you're not being passed over.
I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:08 pm
by Mr. Somebody
Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:09 pm
by likemike
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?

Yup. 170/4.03

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:11 pm
by snehpets
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.
With your scholarship situation and strong interest in CLS, why didn't you ED? Just curious, not making a point or anything. I know there are a lot of reasons not to.

Also, I really think you'll get in/be fine. I'm in a less than prestigious major at a less than prestigious undergrad and it doesn't seem to have mattered. I think a great undergrad can help you but I don't think a bad undergrad really hurts you.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:14 pm
by Nelson
WhiteGuy5 wrote:I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.
Interesting. I'd never heard that. Still, if there was ever a year to bend on that kind of stuff, this would be it since they're going to need all of the 172s they can get to hold the line on the median.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:28 pm
by catwomangirl
likemike wrote:
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?

Yup. 170/4.03
I am non-auto, but with various soft type things going for me.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:29 pm
by bluenoser
Elendil wrote:
MachineLemon wrote:
bluenoser wrote:Anyone else with a 175 still waiting?
175+ and still waiting. Late October submit.
A friend of mine is still waiting with a 175+ 3.9+, late November or early December submit...
Good to know I'm not the only one still waiting with higher numbers. I was beginning to think it might just be because I'm an international student. I can hyperventilate a little less now...

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:31 pm
by JamMasterJ
zworykin wrote:
bluenoser wrote:Anyone else with a 175 still waiting?
176 count?
same

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:33 pm
by kwais
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
Nelson wrote:
WhiteGuy5 wrote:
thestillpoint wrote:Honestly, I have no idea. But if you search LSN for those with 172 and 3.87 - 3.91, you can find six who list a decision for Columbia. Only one was waitlisted. Three were accepted in Feb, one was accepted in January. One was accepted with no date given. Two received a $25,000 scholarship and one received a $30,000.

I don't know the logic, but, despite the small sample size, I've now remained hopeful for both an acceptance and even the possibility of some merit aid for those of us who haven't heard.
I'm right under 3.87 =(
You'll probably get in. Columbia is very predictable and you're at the LSAT median/above the GPA median. I wouldn't worry yet, there haven't been that many people with numbers worse than yours get in up until now besides ED and URM so you're not being passed over.
I remember hearing that Columbia puts more emphasis on where you went to UG than most schools. If so, I went to a very low-on-prestige public school. I've always presumed that dimmed my chances at Columbia specifically.
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:34 pm
by Mr. Somebody
kwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunner

If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed :cry:

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:38 pm
by maxpower430
still waiting here too, mid-November submit.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:39 pm
by snehpets
Mr. Somebody wrote:
kwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunner

If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed :cry:
yeah, this. not only are people at prestigious undergrads perhaps more likely to get the grades/LSAT necessary to get into Columbia, they might also be the type to choose Columbia for the name. not all of them obviously, but certainly enough to give this impression.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:42 pm
by sn20
likemike wrote:
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?

Yup. 170/4.03
170/3.87 here. submitted 9/30

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:42 pm
by emkay625
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?
Yup. 3.23/173. I thought I would've gotten dinged weeks ago.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:43 pm
by zworykin
Mr. Somebody wrote:
kwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunner

If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed :cry:
Wait, though. He just said "prestige" without specifying how the school earned that prestige.

I refer you to the definition of the term:
reputation or influence arising from success, achievement, rank, or other favorable attributes.
My undergrad institution is a veritable fixture on Playboy's annual top party schools list, with a win and several top-three finishes in the past decade. Surely this sort of prestige should count for something, yes?

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:43 pm
by tempur_three
I didn't go to a prestigious undergrad. I also submitted in december if that helps anyone.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:48 pm
by Genki
@tempure_three
I smile everytime I see your avatar.
:D

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:51 pm
by luxxe
zworykin wrote: Wait, though. He just said "prestige" without specifying how the school earned that prestige.

I refer you to the definition of the term:
reputation or influence arising from success, achievement, rank, or other favorable attributes.
My undergrad institution is a veritable fixture on Playboy's annual top party schools list, with a win and several top-three finishes in the past decade. Surely this sort of prestige should count for something, yes?
Hoping for the same. My school just made HuffPo's Socially Awkward Colleges list :lol:.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:58 pm
by pupperoni
columbia does in fact put a lot of emphasis on UG quality. people who get in with borderline numbers 170/171/~3.8 are mostly from ivy UGs or have unique work experiences.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:06 pm
by jwalterweatherman
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?
I'm 172/3.9, but I'm a baby JD (K-JD?). I think that puts me in this group.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:09 pm
by mikeylikesit
Mr. Somebody wrote:Lol is anyone else still waiting who doesn't have auto admit numbers? :?
170/3.8. (But URM so who knows where that really puts me...)

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:11 pm
by AmandaPB
Still waiting here.

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:14 pm
by cgomez
still waiting, didn't break 170 and my gpa is also slightly below median. so everyday with no waitlist or rejection is a great day for me lol

Re: Columbia c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:16 pm
by ScoutFinch
zworykin wrote:
Mr. Somebody wrote:
kwais wrote:
must say that this seems spot on. Everyone and their mom here went to Ivy + Berkeley etc.
That could be self selection - undergrad gunner = LS gunner

If what WG said is true though, I'm screwed :cry:
Wait, though. He just said "prestige" without specifying how the school earned that prestige.

I refer you to the definition of the term:
reputation or influence arising from success, achievement, rank, or other favorable attributes.
My undergrad institution is a veritable fixture on Playboy's annual top party schools list, with a win and several top-three finishes in the past decade. Surely this sort of prestige should count for something, yes?
Heeeyyy, I went to that school! I think we should get extra credit for managing >3.0 in that environment :D