Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
seanPtheB
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby seanPtheB » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:01 pm

Submitted, good luck everyone!

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:39 pm

seanPtheB wrote:Submitted, good luck everyone!

your gpa. I want it

roguewave19
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:25 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby roguewave19 » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:29 pm

For those with unsolicited merit-based fee waivers.. did you get them via email or mail? And it's all just automatically waived at the end, with codes only being for those who solicited right?

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:47 pm

Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?

User avatar
Xifeng
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Xifeng » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:54 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?


http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lsat+addendum+chicago+law&l=1

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:58 pm

Xifeng wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?


http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lsat+addendum+chicago+law&l=1

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

User avatar
UnamSanctam
Posts: 7171
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby UnamSanctam » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:59 pm

TBF, he is terrible with technology.

User avatar
tmon
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby tmon » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:02 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.

This :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:02 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.

I am currently looking at my keyboard while typing this. If the LSAT was electronic, I would get a 145

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

By the way, I found it. They said to explain any big jumps in scores 8)

User avatar
Xifeng
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Xifeng » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.


I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD

User avatar
UnamSanctam
Posts: 7171
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby UnamSanctam » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.


I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD


He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.

User avatar
soj
Posts: 7735
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby soj » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:46 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:
Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.


I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD


He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.

At first I thought you said contraception and was confused.

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:03 pm

soj wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:
Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.


I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD


He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.

At first I thought you said contraception and was confused.

that would be Unam

This conversation brought to you by: lolCatholic

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:52 pm

submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous

User avatar
Tiago Splitter
Posts: 15515
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Tiago Splitter » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:52 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous


Congrats dude. Good luck!

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:55 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous


Congrats dude. Good luck!

Now I can stop annoying everyone in NH :P


Did you decide to RD everywhere?

User avatar
Tiago Splitter
Posts: 15515
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Tiago Splitter » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:01 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous


Congrats dude. Good luck!

Now I can stop annoying everyone in NH :P


Did you decide to RD everywhere?


Yah unless something crazy goes down next month. Looks like 100% RD for me.

User avatar
Xifeng
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Xifeng » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:22 am

JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous


Congrats! Hope to see you here next year :)

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 am

Xifeng wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous


Congrats! Hope to see you here next year :)

thanks, maybe I'll learn about computers before LS

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:53 pm

Hey, current students: If I end up getting accepted ED, I want to come up over my fiancee's Christmas (basically Dec 20 - Jan 10 or so). It looks like you get back for winter quarter on Jan 3. Would that be a good time to come up?

User avatar
Perdevise
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Perdevise » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:38 pm

Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.

User avatar
MiamiOxford
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:50 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby MiamiOxford » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.


Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.

User avatar
Perdevise
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby Perdevise » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:16 pm

MiamiOxford wrote:
Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.


Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.


I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.

User avatar
JamMasterJ
Posts: 6688
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Postby JamMasterJ » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:20 pm

Perdevise wrote:
MiamiOxford wrote:
Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.


Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.


I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.

meaning that if people are still above the gpa median, there is less competition for reverse splitter "spots" than there was before, al least hypothetically.
This would be easier to determine if it was the LSAT score that we were talking about b/c it's easier to predict how my traditional splitters will exist at each value, but yes, it does probably bode well for you guys :cry:




Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”